the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement report: Investigation of Optical Properties of Different Fuels Diesel Exhaust by an Atmospheric Simulation Chamber experiment
Abstract. This study investigates the optical properties and variability of the mass absorption coefficient (MAC) of carbonaceous aerosols produced by the combustion of different fuels. Emissions were also characterized in terms of particle size distribution and concentrations of elemental (EC) and organic carbon (OC). Experiments were conducted in an atmospheric simulation chamber with a soot generator fueled with propane and a commercial diesel engine running on regular diesel and Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO). Different methods of sampling and analyzing carbonaceous aerosols were evaluated, focusing on workplace environments. The EC:TC (total carbon) ratios were found to be around 0.7 for propane, 0.15 for diesel, and 0.4 for HVO, indicating a higher proportion of OC in the diesel and HVO samples. Fresh soot particles showed monomodal log-normal distributions with peaks varying based on the fuel type and combustion process, with propane particles exhibiting a peak at larger particle sizes compared to HVO and diesel. The optical properties revealed that the MAC values varied across different fuel exhausts. Diesel combustion produced more light-absorbing particles compared to propane and HVO, with MAC values measured between 870 and 635 nm ranging from 6.2 ± 0.5 to 9.4 ± 0.4 m² g⁻¹ for commercial diesel, 5.2 ± 0.5 to 7.8 ± 1.1 m² g⁻¹ for propane, and 5.8 ± 0.2 to 8.4 ± 0.6 m² g⁻¹ for HVO.
- Preprint
(1102 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1447', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Apr 2025
reply
The study presented here is a valuable contribution to the aerosol community. It provides optical properties, more specifically mass absorption cross section values, for three different soot-like aerosol samples. Two of the samples are based on the combustion of liquid fuels burned in a real diesel engine. The manuscript is well written and the data are well presented. I would suggest publishing it after addressing the following comments:
Scientific comments
- Provide information on the calibration of the various instruments, especially the PAX.
- The EC:TC ratio is quite different for the different samples. The larger amount of OC in some samples could affect the MAC amid coating. However, the authors do not address this issue. Please comment on this.
- It has been shown that MISG soot has an average diameter between 200-300 nm. The very different particle diameter compared to the other two samples will strongly affect the MAC values, making these results not comparable. In addition, the large size of MISG-generated soot particles is not representative of engine exhaust soot. Is the use of the MISG still justified?
- It would be interesting to see how the different absorption coefficient measurement techniques compare in terms of b_abs.
- In Table 4, it would be valuable to include the MAC values interpolated to 550 nm in addition to those already shown. This would make it easier for the reader to make comparisons with literature values.
- What is the wavelength in Figure 4? Please add it to the axis labels.
- I would recommend showing the absorption angstrom exponents measured by the MWAA.
- The conclusion section is weak. There is no discussion of the implications of the MAC values found in the study. Please improve.
- "Correction factors" are mentioned on page 16. Please elaborate. What corrections are referenced?Typos
- Page 11, second paragraph: MISG is misspelled.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1447-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1447', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Apr 2025
reply
See attached PDF
Data sets
Dataset for "Measurement report: Investigation of Optical Properties of Different Fuels Diesel Exhaust by an Atmospheric Simulation Chamber experiment" Silvia Giulia Danelli https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/v6p5r5dmdy/1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
113 | 24 | 7 | 144 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 113
- PDF: 24
- XML: 7
- Total: 144
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1