Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1414
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1414
08 May 2025
 | 08 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Hydrometeor partitioning ratios for dual-frequency space-borne and polarimetric ground-based radar observations

Velibor Pejcic, Kamil Mroz, Kai Mühlbauer, and Silke Trömel

Abstract. Conventional radar-based hydrometeor classification (HMC) algorithms identify the dominant hydrometeor type within a resolved radar volume, while more recent techniques allow estimation of the proportions of individual hydrometeor classes (hydrometeor partitioning ratios, HPRs) within a mixture. These newer algorithms (HMCPDP) are based on dual-polarization (DP) measurements from ground-based radars (GR), while similar algorithms do not yet exist for space-borne radars (SR) with dual-frequency (DF) capabilities. This study has three objectives, (1) to evaluate HPR retrievals, (2) to exploit the combination of DF SR and DP GR for estimating HPR based on satellite DF observations (HPRkDF) and (3) to further improve HPRkDP estimates based on GR DP observations. To achieve these, DP measurements of NEXRAD’s GRs are matched with those of the dual-frequency precipitation radar of the Global Precipitation Measurement Core satellite. All matched volumes are represented by averaged DF and DP observations and several hundred GR sub-volumes classified with the standard HMC. The latter are used to calculate quasi-HPRs (qHPRs). qHPRs and averaged DF and DP variables serve as basis for the HPRkDF and HPRkDP retrievals, which in turn are evaluated with the qHPRs. The vertical distributions of HPRkDF and HMCPDP products are in good agreement. Furthermore, the estimated HPRs show for most hydrometeor classes high correlations with the qHPRs and confirm the overall good performance of the algorithms. However, HMCPDP performance is superior to HMCPDF. In both DF and DP space, snow HPRs are underestimated, graupel HPRs are overestimated, and HPRs for big drops show only low correlations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Velibor Pejcic, Kamil Mroz, Kai Mühlbauer, and Silke Trömel

Status: open (until 13 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Velibor Pejcic, Kamil Mroz, Kai Mühlbauer, and Silke Trömel
Velibor Pejcic, Kamil Mroz, Kai Mühlbauer, and Silke Trömel

Viewed

Total article views: 83 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
74 7 2 83 1 1
  • HTML: 74
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 83
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 83 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 83 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Estimating the proportions of individual hydrometeor types (hydrometeor partitioning ratios, HPRs) in a mixture of a resolved radar volume and their evaluation is challenging. This study has three objectives, (1) to evaluate HPR retrievals, (2) to exploit the combination of dual-frequency (DF) space-borne radar (SR) and dual-polarisation (DP) ground-based radar (GR) observations for estimating HPRs based on SR DF observations and (3) to further improve HPR estimates based on DP GR observations.
Share