the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Abiotic CO2 Sequestration via River Runoff: A Potential "Missing Sink" Dampening Atmospheric Warming?
Abstract. The international system for greenhouse gas emission accounting relies on national emission and absorption accounting. The effectiveness of these systems in accounting for carbon sinks is questionable due to the complexities of local carbon dioxide control in the atmosphere and uncertainties in forestry carbon balance assessments. This review proposes that irreversible abiotic mechanisms for removing carbon from the cycle of substances should play a major role in carbon sink accounting, as a complement to biotic carbon capture. While the capture and fixation of carbon by ecosystems is a reversible process and represents only the first step toward its removal from the atmosphere, subsequent steps leading to irreversible carbon sequestration depend mainly on the interaction of ecosystems with water flows that form continental runoff. This paper provides estimates that suggest a significant increase in previously existing values of carbon removal via river runoff, and concludes that continental runoff is a primary mechanism leading to long-term carbon sequestration.
- Preprint
(814 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Jun 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1329', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 May 2025
reply
A review typically has a comprehensive review of the literature, this manuscript lists 10 references. With a thorough review of the existing literature the author would have been aware that Arctic rivers are supersaturated with CO2 most of the year, representing a source of CO2 to the atmosphere and not a sink. The supersaturation in the rivers comes from the respiration of organic carbon mobilized from the watershed vegetation and soil.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1329-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexander Samsonov, 14 May 2025
reply
First, I would like to note that the reviewer agrees that the saturation limit of the water of northern rivers for CO2 has been reached. But our opinions differ in interpreting the result. Namely, in the question of where the movement of carbon is directed - into the ocean or into the atmosphere. The fact is that the answer depends on the time of year. My attention was drawn to the period when the frozen surface of the water does not allow spontaneous degassing of the river. This period is from 160 to 200 days for different northern rivers. At this time, the river is a transport sink for carbon to the ocean, transporting to the ocean not only water supersaturated with CO2, but also microorganisms, which have enough time to fully develop during the under-ice rafting. The coastal zone of the ocean is also frozen at this time, over most of the surface.  As a result of mixing of waters in the mouth under the ice, mixing mechanisms come into action, saturating coastal waters with carbon and enabling abnormally rapid development of all microbiota and biota, which provides food for a huge biomass of fish. But in this article we do not touch upon biological processes, but only state the existence of a transport route to the ocean. The lifetime of this route is from 150 to 200 days, i.e. from 0.4 to 0.55 years. So this coefficient will be a real estimate of the share of annual river transfer playing the role of carbon sink from the entire catchment area of ​​the river.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1329-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexander Samsonov, 14 May 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
124 | 27 | 8 | 159 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 124
- PDF: 27
- XML: 8
- Total: 159
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1