Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1224
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1224
07 Apr 2025
 | 07 Apr 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

How to deal w___ missing input data

Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Grey Nearing, Deborah Cohen, and Oren Gilon

Abstract. Deep learning hydrologic models have made their way from research to applications. More and more national hydrometeorological agencies, hydro power operators, and engineering consulting companies are building Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models for operational use cases. All of these efforts come across similar sets of challenges—challenges that are different from those in controlled scientific studies. In this paper, we tackle one of these issues: how to deal with missing input data? Operational systems depend on the real-time availability of various data products—most notably, meteorological forcings. The more external dependencies a model has, however, the more likely it is to experience an outage in one of them. We introduce and compare three different solutions that can generate predictions even when some of the meteorological input data do not arrive in time, or not arrive at all.

Competing interests: Daniel Klotz is editor at HESS.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Download
Short summary
Missing input data are one of the most common challenges when building deep learning...
Share