the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol
Abstract. Measuring the elemental composition of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) can provide useful information on the adverse effects of PM and help the identification of emission sources. Carrying out these measurements at a high time resolution (1-h or less) allows to describe the fast processes to which aerosol particles are subjected in the atmosphere, leading to a better characterisation of the emissions. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) is one of the most widespread techniques used to determine the elemental composition of PM. In recent years, new systems known as online XRF spectrometers have been developed to provide real-time measurements of the PM elemental concentration at a high time resolution. Among these advanced instruments, the Xact® 625i Ambient Metals Monitor by Cooper Environmental (USA) performs in situ automated measurements with a user selected time resolution ranging from 15 to 240 min. In this study, an Xact® 625i monitor was deployed for nearly 6 months (July–December 2023) in Milan (Po Valley, Italy) at a monitoring station of the Lombardy Regional Agency for Environmental Protection (ARPA Lombardia). The instrument was configured to quantify 36 elements, ranging from Al to Bi, with 1-h time resolution in the PM10 fraction. The objective of the study was to verify the correct functioning of the instrument and to evaluate the quality and robustness of the data produced. Xact® 625i data were aggregated to 24-h daily means and then compared to 24-h PM10 filter data retrieved by ARPA Lombardia in the same station and analyzed offline for the elemental concentration with a benchtop XRF spectrometer. The intercomparison focused on the 16 elements (Al, Si, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Sr, and Pb) whose concentrations were consistently above their minimum detection limits (MDL) for both online and offline techniques. Results of the intercomparison were satisfying showing that the Xact® 625i elemental concentrations were found to be highly correlated to the offline XRF analyses (R2 ranging from 0.67 to 0.99) and slopes ranging from 0.79 to 1.3 (just a couple of elements showed slopes up to 1.70).
- Preprint
(765 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(807 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 May 2025)
-
CC1: 'AUTHOR Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Roberta Vecchi, 12 Mar 2025
reply
Please see the attached files for Figures 2-3-4 which are not correctly reproduced in the orginal published file.
-
CC2: 'AUTHOR Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Roberta Vecchi, 20 Mar 2025
reply
Please see the attached file for the Supplementary material as Figure S2 which is not correctly reproduced in the orginal published file.
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Apr 2025
reply
Online chemical characterisation of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) is a topic of interest for Air Quality and atmospheric research. In the recent years there are networks for atmospheric research implementing a combination of ACSM / XRF online / Aethalometers for a complete online characterisation of PM. Instruments for continuous analysis of metals in PM are based on EDXRF measurement. Nowadays, the Xact625i is the most widely used. However, these measurements have limitations mainly related to the measurement technique and the low concentration of PM sampled during short periods.
This paper evaluates the performance of the Xact625i, measuring PM10 with hourly resolution, by comparing with the offline analysis of PM collected in filters during 24h and analyzed offline by EDXRF. Novelty of the manuscript is the comparison with offline EXRF or a long time period (6 months). Results obtained are quite good for most selected elements. Three groups of elements have been identified base on different regression coefficients and slopes. Reasons of these differences are not properly discussed.
Overall, results obtained are of interest and merit publication. However, a major discussion about limitations of the technique and comparison with previous studies is needed.
Line 26: please, indicate that the Xact was equipped with a PM10 size cut inlet
Line 60. You should also comment about limitations of XRF: detection limits of some tracers of interest can be too high compared with PIXE or ICP-MS analyses. Also. Analysis depends on the matrix; so, it can vary depending on the composition of the aerosol.
Section 2.4. What was the minimum number of hours of valid data considered to calculate daily averages for the intercomparison?
Figure 1. Considering all available measurements or only the simultaneous ones?
Is there any difference in the correlations considering the three periods separately?
The discussion about comparison with previous studies should be improved. Are all the differences attributable to the calibration? Can be related to the local PM composition? What is the explanation for the different elements selected at each study? The MDL / ambient concentrations?
Different sizes may affect the comparison for some elements given the matrix effect. Park et al., used a forerunner version equipped with a PM2.5 inlet. Which inlet size was used by Tremper et al., 2018? And by Furger et al., 2017?
Conclusions: you should add some statements about limitations of the technique. For example, limitations for the analysis of some key tracers such as V, Ba, Sn, As…
Line 370: You should add that this Al measurement limitation is related to the instrument.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
121 | 31 | 6 | 158 | 15 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 121
- PDF: 31
- XML: 6
- Total: 158
- Supplement: 15
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 59 | 34 |
France | 2 | 19 | 11 |
China | 3 | 15 | 8 |
Italy | 4 | 11 | 6 |
undefined | 5 | 7 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 59