Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110
11 Mar 2025
 | 11 Mar 2025

Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol

Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi

Abstract. Measuring the elemental composition of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) can provide useful information on the adverse effects of PM and help the identification of emission sources. Carrying out these measurements at a high time resolution (1-h or less) allows to describe the fast processes to which aerosol particles are subjected in the atmosphere, leading to a better characterisation of the emissions. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) is one of the most widespread techniques used to determine the elemental composition of PM. In recent years, new systems known as online XRF spectrometers have been developed to provide real-time measurements of the PM elemental concentration at a high time resolution. Among these advanced instruments, the Xact® 625i Ambient Metals Monitor by Cooper Environmental (USA) performs in situ automated measurements with a user selected time resolution ranging from 15 to 240 min. In this study, an Xact® 625i monitor was deployed for nearly 6 months (July–December 2023) in Milan (Po Valley, Italy) at a monitoring station of the Lombardy Regional Agency for Environmental Protection (ARPA Lombardia). The instrument was configured to quantify 36 elements, ranging from Al to Bi, with 1-h time resolution in the PM10 fraction. The objective of the study was to verify the correct functioning of the instrument and to evaluate the quality and robustness of the data produced. Xact® 625i data were aggregated to 24-h daily means and then compared to 24-h PM10 filter data retrieved by ARPA Lombardia in the same station and analyzed offline for the elemental concentration with a benchtop XRF spectrometer. The intercomparison focused on the 16 elements (Al, Si, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Sr, and Pb) whose concentrations were consistently above their minimum detection limits (MDL) for both online and offline techniques. Results of the intercomparison were satisfying showing that the Xact® 625i elemental concentrations were found to be highly correlated to the offline XRF analyses (R2 ranging from 0.67 to 0.99) and slopes ranging from 0.79 to 1.3 (just a couple of elements showed slopes up to 1.70).

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

12 Nov 2025
Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6435–6448, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025, 2025
Short summary
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'AUTHOR Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Roberta Vecchi, 12 Mar 2025
  • CC2: 'AUTHOR Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Roberta Vecchi, 20 Mar 2025
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Apr 2025
  • CC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Ivonne Trebs, 23 Apr 2025
    • CC4: 'Reply on CC3', Roberta Vecchi, 23 Apr 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 May 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'AUTHOR Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Roberta Vecchi, 12 Mar 2025
  • CC2: 'AUTHOR Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Roberta Vecchi, 20 Mar 2025
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Apr 2025
  • CC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Ivonne Trebs, 23 Apr 2025
    • CC4: 'Reply on CC3', Roberta Vecchi, 23 Apr 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-110', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 May 2025

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Kaspar R. Daellenbach on behalf of the Authors (24 Jun 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Jun 2025) by Albert Presto
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (12 Jul 2025)
ED: Publish as is (30 Jul 2025) by Albert Presto
AR by Kaspar R. Daellenbach on behalf of the Authors (28 Aug 2025)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

12 Nov 2025
Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6435–6448, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025, 2025
Short summary
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi

Viewed

Total article views: 1,137 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
987 99 51 1,137 51 23 51
  • HTML: 987
  • PDF: 99
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 1,137
  • Supplement: 51
  • BibTeX: 23
  • EndNote: 51
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,117 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,117 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Nov 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
This study presents the deployment of the Xact® 625i Ambient Metals Monitor in Milan (Po Valley, Italy) and its performance in measuring PM10 elemental composition at a high temporal resolution. Our findings demonstrate strong agreement between online and offline XRF analyses, underscoring the potential of advanced monitoring technologies for air quality research.
Share