the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analysis of Lightning-Induced Currents in Supply Cable Shields and Their Impact on LLS Sensor Site Errors
Abstract. Lightning location system (LLS) sensors, which detect and locate atmospheric discharges, are typically powered by cables buried up to one meter underground. Within the LLS community, it is well known that these cables can create spurious magnetic fields, which can in turn adversely impact the sensor measurements and the resulting data. This issue arises from currents induced in the cable shield by the lightning electromagnetic fields that penetrate the ground. The magnetic field generated by these currents lead to "site errors," causing inaccuracies in estimating the angle of incidence and the peak current of lightning strokes. Although these sensor-specific errors can be partially corrected, a better understanding of the coupling mechanism between the lightning electromagnetic field and the cable could help in minimizing the site errors. This study presents an analysis of the lightning electromagnetic field interaction with cables and examines the influence of various ground and cable properties on this interaction. This work represents a first step toward understanding the physical mechanism leading to LLS sensor site errors. Considering simplified scenarios involving a single insulated or bare conductor, this work provides practical insights that LLS operators can use to estimate worst-case site errors for a provisioned sensor site. Additionally, we show that some site errors observed in operational sensors can be successfully reproduced with good agreement using the proposed approach.
- Preprint
(6395 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1015', Martin Murphy, 05 Jun 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Jun 2025
Dear Martin Murphy,
thank you very much for your valuable review, positive remarks and constructive feedback. The comments and questions allowed to improve the paper.
Kindly find the answers to your questions (highlighted in green) and the adaptations of the addressed sections/segments/formulations (highlighted in orange) in the appended PDF document.
Best regards, also on behalf of all co-authors,
Hannes Kohlmann
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1015', Kenneth Cummins, 26 Jul 2025
See attached pdf. Note that today was the final date for me to submit my reviewer comments. Due to unanticipated circumstances, I was unable to complete transcription/refinement of my "Minor/Editorial Comments/Suggestions" portion of the review (beyond line 351). I DID complete my "General Comments" and my "Scientific/Technical Questions/Comments/Issues". If allowed, I will add my other minor comments and suggestions in the next few days.Â
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Aug 2025
Dear Kenneth Cummins,
on behalf of all co-authors I wish to thank you for your valuable review - in particular, for the meticulous inspection and the careful listing of the issues and comments. Based on this valuable input, the manuscript has been improved and re-examined once more with respect to the plausibility of individual steps, the selection of parameters, and the overall rigor of the methodology.
Kindly find the answers to your questions (highlighted in green) and the adaptations of the addressed sections/segments/formulations (highlighted in orange) in the appended PDF document.
Best regards,
Hannes Kohlmann
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Aug 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1015', Dylan Goldberg, 27 Jul 2025
Please see the attached pdf for my comments.
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC3', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Aug 2025
Dear Dylan Goldberg,
on behalf of all co-authors I wish to thank you for your valuable time to review the manuscript and your comments! Kindly find the answers (highlighted in green) to your questions and comments and the adaptations of the addressed sections/segments/formulations (highlighted in orange) in the appended PDF document.
Best regards,
Hannes Kohlmann
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC3', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Aug 2025
-
RC4: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1015', Kenneth Cummins, 28 Jul 2025
I have enow added the rest of my Minor/Editorial Comments/Suggestions that were missing in my comments on July 25.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC4', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Aug 2025
Dear Kenneth Cummins,
the PDF with the answers to the complete set of comments was uploaded as a response to RC2!
Best regards,
Hannes KohlmannCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1015-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC4', Hannes Kohlmann, 18 Aug 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
325 | 134 | 23 | 482 | 7 | 25 |
- HTML: 325
- PDF: 134
- XML: 23
- Total: 482
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 25
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1