Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4094
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4094
16 Jan 2025
 | 16 Jan 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Assessing the effect of forest management on above-ground carbon stock by remote sensing

Sofie Van Winckel, Jonas Simons, Stef Lhermitte, and Bart Muys

Abstract. As the global community intensifies efforts to combat climate change, insights on the influence of management on forest carbon stocks and fluxes are becoming invaluable for establishing sustainable forest management practices. However, accurately and efficiently monitoring carbon stocks remains technologically challenging. In this study, we aim to 1) leverage the complementary strengths of optical, Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) remote sensing technologies to improve overall accuracy and scalability in carbon stock estimation, and to 2) assess the effect of forest management on carbon stock by comparing unconfounded pairs of managed and unmanaged forests in the National Park Brabantse Wouden (Flanders, Belgium). Remote sensing data from Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1, and a canopy height product derived from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation mission (GEDI) were used as predictors in a generalized additive model (GAM) to estimate carbon stock. The combination of all three remote sensing sources significantly improved model accuracy (R²=0.68, RMSE=56.35, MAE=50.07) compared to a model using only Sentinel-2 indices (R²=0.56, RMSE=99.44, MAE=91.40). While field assessment exhibited higher carbon stocks in unmanaged stands compared to managed ones, this difference was not detectable using a remote sensing model that incorporated Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1, and GEDI variables. Potential explanations for this discrepancy include signal saturation and the need for more training data.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Sofie Van Winckel, Jonas Simons, Stef Lhermitte, and Bart Muys

Status: open (until 27 Feb 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sofie Van Winckel, Jonas Simons, Stef Lhermitte, and Bart Muys
Sofie Van Winckel, Jonas Simons, Stef Lhermitte, and Bart Muys

Viewed

Total article views: 61 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
59 1 1 61 0 0
  • HTML: 59
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 61
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 61 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 61 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 17 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
Insights on management's impact on forest carbon stocks are crucial for sustainable forest management practices. However, accurately monitoring carbon stocks remains a technological challenge. This study estimates above-ground carbon stock in managed and unmanaged forests using passive optical, SAR, and LiDAR remote sensing data. Results show promising potential in using multiple remote sensing predictors and publicly available high-resolution data for mapping forest carbon stocks.