the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement report: Number size distribution of sub-40 nm particles in the Amazon rainforest
Abstract. The Amazon rainforest is a unique environment to investigate aerosol properties with limited impact from human activities, further providing a new perspective to look at the aerosol characteristics in regions heavily affected by anthropogenic emissions. Obtaining the size distributions of nucleation mode particles in the atmosphere is key to understanding aerosol formation, evolution and their impacts. Although routine and long-term aerosol measurements have been conducted in the Amazon region, information regarding sub-10 nm particles is still limited. In this study, we performed aerosol measurements from December 2022 to January 2023 on a 54-meterhigh platform of the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO). Three advanced instruments namely the Nano Condensation Nuclei Counter (nCNC), the Neutral Cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS), and the NanoScanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS), were employed to measure the number size distributions of aerosol particles and naturally charged ions smaller than 40 nm. The results reveal that the median total number concentration of the measured particles with diameters ranging from 1.5 nm to 1000 nm was 969 cm-3. We found concentration. There was a significant increase in the number concentration of sub-3 nm particles in January 2023 (median, 573 cm-3) a large number of particles smaller than 3.5 nm, which accounted for up to 59 % of the measured total number compared to December 2022 (371 cm-3). The median number concentration of particles above 3.5 nm in December and January were 481 and 335 cm-3, respectively. No typical regional new particle formation events were observed throughout the measurement period. However, clear diurnal variations were observed for the sub-3 nm particles under pristine conditions, with the maximum concentration around noontime. Similar diurnal patterns were also observed for natural cluster ions (0.8–2 nm), with their concentration in January slightly higher than in December. Quantifying the properties of the aerosol particles in the Amazon rainforest helps to understand the processes governing the aerosol budget in the pristine atmosphere, and is essential for determining the impact of anthropogenic aerosols on climate.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(1901 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(387 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 23 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3911', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Mar 2025
reply
In this measurement report, the number size distribution of sub-40 nm particles derived from different instruments in the Amazon rainforest has been reported, including the diurnal pattern and the sources of nanoparticles, especially for the particles below 10 nm. This study provides valuable information in understanding the particle sources in Amazon region and highlight the necessity about the study on nanoparticles. However, further discussion needs to be added to make the results more robust. I recommend this paper being accepted after the below issues are addressed.
- Line 45, It is necessary to clearly state that with or without a core sampling device, how much the sampling efficiency was changed for PSM.
- Section 2.2.4, is there any calibration was conducted before or after for the intercomparison between nCNC and TSI SMPS? Or the two instruments' inherent system error was lower than 20%? It would be better if the authors can the information about if there are any other studies did such intercomparison, otherwise, how could we know the 20% discrepancy is a “good agreement”. In figure 1, please make sure the slope is positive or negative.
- Line 210, it should be better to give the definition of “Amazonian bananas” here, otherwise, it may lead the reader to mistakenly think it refers to banana shaped NPF.
- Line 220-227,is the “high RH range (90-100%)” corresponding to the precipitation? How much is the data excluded from the dataset due to precipitation or high RH? As the mean RH during this measurement was ~85%, that means the probability of the RH exceeding 85% is high.
- Line 240, have you looked in to the information about radiation and cloud cover in this study? In addition, as the authors have mentioned the high RH during the measurement, it can also be a reason why no typical NPF was observed. As water vapor can also contribute to the high condensation sink in the ambient air, whereas the CS is normally calculated based on the dry PNSD.
- Line 263-264, is that reasonable that the December data can represent the dry season as the mean RH was approximate 79%? The authors may refer to the previous literature to check the typical RH levels during the dry season in Amazon.
- Line 368, it is addressed that on clean days the photochemistry is favorable for the production of nucleated particles. however, it is also stated that there is no typical NPF cases occurred. So that means the burst of nucleation existed, but without clear growth processes. Please give more explanation about the reason.
- Line 405, the first sentence is not rigorous, as the authors also mentioned other studies (such as Wimmer et al., 2018 and Zhou et al., 2002) also conducted the particle size measurement below 10 nm. Please highlight the difference between this work and the others.
- Table 1, the unit of particle number concentration should be given
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3911-RC1
Data sets
Measurement report: Number size distribution of sub-40 nm particles in the Amazon rainforest Jianqiang Zhu, Guo Li, Uwe Kuhn, Bruno Backes Meller, Christopher Pöhlker, Paulo Artaxo, Ulrich Pöschl, Yafang Cheng, and Hang Su https://doi.org/10.17617/3.ZBHLIR
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 | 22 | 6 | 117 | 18 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 89
- PDF: 22
- XML: 6
- Total: 117
- Supplement: 18
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 52 | 40 |
Germany | 2 | 15 | 11 |
China | 3 | 13 | 10 |
France | 4 | 7 | 5 |
undefined | 5 | 7 | 5 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 52