the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of non-normal flow rule on linear kinematic features in pan-Arctic ice-ocean simulations
Abstract. One important conclusion of the Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx) is that continuum based sea ice models, with different spatial discretizations and/or sea ice rheologies, all simulate intersection angles between linear kinematic features (LKFs) that are too wide compared to observations. The peak of the probability density function (PDF) of simulated intersection angles is around 90° while the PDF for observed angles rather exhibits a peak around 45°. Ringeisen et al. 2021 proposed to remedy this issue for viscous-plastic (VP) and elastic-VP (EVP) models by introducing a non-normal flow rule specified by a plastic potential. We implemented the plastic potential approach of Ringeisen et al. 2021 in the CICE sea ice model. In pan-Arctic simulations, the non-normal flow rule also leads to a peak of the PDF around 90°. We show that this peak at 90° is at least partly a consequence of many LKFs that are aligned with the computational grid. Nevertheless, the non-normal flow rule brings an interesting capability: it could be used to independently optimize simulated LKFs and more generally deformations while parameters defining the yield curve could serve for modifying simulated landfast ice and to a lesser extent sea ice drift.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(5526 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(5526 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3831', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Apr 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2024-3831-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3831', Guillaume Boutin, 30 Apr 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3831', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Apr 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3831', Guillaume Boutin, 30 Apr 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3831/egusphere-2024-3831-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', J.-F. Lemieux, 26 May 2025
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 715 | 60 | 22 | 797 | 27 | 32 |
- HTML: 715
- PDF: 60
- XML: 22
- Total: 797
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 32
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Jean-Francois Lemieux
Mathieu Plante
Nils Hutter
Damien Ringeisen
Bruno Tremblay
Francois Roy
Philippe Blain
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(5526 KB) - Metadata XML