Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3440
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3440
06 Jan 2025
 | 06 Jan 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Spatio-temporal pattern analysis of MOPITT total column CO using varimax rotation and singular spectrum analysis

John Motley McKinnon, Chayan Roychoudhury, and Avelino Florentino Arellano Jr.

Abstract. In this paper, we apply varimax empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis to MOPITT total column CO retrievals to answer the question of whether or not it is possible to disentangle the dominant CO sources associated with inferred modes of variability at regional to global scales. Additionally, we write this manuscript with the intention to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of EOF analysis, specifically their usage in the field of atmospheric chemistry. We analyzed daily MOPITT Version 8 Level 3 joint (TIR-NIR) products from 2005 to 2018, aggregated every 8 days on a 1° by 1° grid. Our findings show that EOF patterns of MOPITT CO are consistent across various regional subdomains, demonstrating that these spatial patterns are independent of the chosen domain. A comparison of the eigenvalue spectrum reveals that unrotated EOF analysis yields three distinct modes, while varimax rotation reduces these to two. The power spectra of the principal components indicate that the first two unrotated modes are primarily driven by annual and semi-annual cycles, while the third mode reflects seasonal variations occurring over roughly three months. To further isolate these modes, we employed singular spectrum analysis (SSA) at each grid point to generate long-term, seasonal, and residual EOF patterns. The power spectrum analysis of the principal components shows that the long-term EOFs replicate the original two dominant modes, while the seasonal EOFs reveal significant variations over 2 to 3 months, and the residual modes exhibit time scales of 2 months or shorter. By plotting the mean skewness field we show the dataset is non-Gaussian, leading us to conclude each principal component is time-dependent despite being uncorrelated. The periodic decay observed in the temporal auto-correlation function for each time series suggests a classification of wide-sense cyclostationary or wide-sense polycyclostationary behavior. We find the non-stationarity of each time series together with the temporal dependence of modes leads us to conclude that EOF analysis alone cannot fully disentangle individual CO sources. Consequently, we recommend exploring cyclostationary EOF analysis in future studies. These limitations must be carefully considered when interpreting EOF patterns of other composition datasets with similar characteristics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
John Motley McKinnon, Chayan Roychoudhury, and Avelino Florentino Arellano Jr.

Status: open (until 11 Feb 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
John Motley McKinnon, Chayan Roychoudhury, and Avelino Florentino Arellano Jr.
John Motley McKinnon, Chayan Roychoudhury, and Avelino Florentino Arellano Jr.

Viewed

Total article views: 26 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
25 1 0 26 0 0
  • HTML: 25
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 26
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 26 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 26 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
We explore the use of a statistical method called EOF analysis to analyze complex data, focusing on its strengths and limitations. While this method is widely used in climate research, its use in atmospheric chemistry is relatively new. We found that while EOF analysis can be powerful, it may not always be suitable for datasets that do not follow specific statistical assumptions. Our research provides recommendations to improve how we use this technique in analyzing atmospheric chemistry data.