Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-895
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-895
06 May 2024
 | 06 May 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

First results of the polar regional climate model RACMO2.4

Christiaan T. van Dalum, Willem Jan van de Berg, Srinidhi N. Gadde, Maurice van Tiggelen, Tijmen van der Drift, Erik van Meijgaard, Lambertus H. van Ulft, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Abstract. A next version of the polar regional climate model RACMO (referred to as RACMO2.4p1) is presented in this study. The principal update includes embedding of the package of physical parameterizations of the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) cycle 47r1. This constitutes changes in the precipitation, convection, turbulence, aerosol and surface schemes, and includes a new cloud scheme with more prognostic variables and a dedicated lake model. Furthermore, the stand-alone IFS radiation physics module ecRad is incorporated in RACMO, and a multi-layer snow module for non-glaciated regions is introduced. Other updates involve the introduction of a fractional land-ice mask, new and updated climatological data sets, such as aerosol concentrations and leaf-area index, and the revision of several parameterizations specific to glaciated regions. As a proof of concept, we show first results for Greenland, Antarctica and a region encompassing the Arctic. By comparing the results with observations and the output from the previous model version (RACMO2.3p3), we show that the model performs well regarding the surface mass balance, surface energy balance, temperature, wind speed, cloud content and snow depth. The advection of snow hydrometeors strongly impacts the ice sheet's local surface mass balance, particularly in high-accumulation regions such as southeast Greenland and the Antarctic Peninsula. We critically assess the model output and identify some processes that would benefit from further model development.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Christiaan T. van Dalum, Willem Jan van de Berg, Srinidhi N. Gadde, Maurice van Tiggelen, Tijmen van der Drift, Erik van Meijgaard, Lambertus H. van Ulft, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Status: open (until 17 Jun 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Christiaan T. van Dalum, Willem Jan van de Berg, Srinidhi N. Gadde, Maurice van Tiggelen, Tijmen van der Drift, Erik van Meijgaard, Lambertus H. van Ulft, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Data sets

Monthly RACMO2.4p1 data for Greenland (11 km) and Antarctica (27 km) for SMB, SEB, near-surface temperature and wind speed (2006-2015) Christiaan van Dalum, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Michiel van den Broeke https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10854319

Christiaan T. van Dalum, Willem Jan van de Berg, Srinidhi N. Gadde, Maurice van Tiggelen, Tijmen van der Drift, Erik van Meijgaard, Lambertus H. van Ulft, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Viewed

Total article views: 267 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
165 97 5 267 5 3
  • HTML: 165
  • PDF: 97
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 267
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 263 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 263 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 May 2024
Download
Short summary
We present a new version of the polar regional climate model RACMO, version 2.4p1, and show first results for Greenland, Antarctica and the Arctic. We provide an overview of all changes and investigate the impact that they have on the climate of polar regions. By comparing the results with observations and the output from the previous model version, we show that the model performs well regarding the surface mass balance of the ice sheets and near-surface climate.