the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data quality control and calibration for mini-radiosonde system “Storm Tracker” in Taiwan
Abstract. This study introduced and evaluated the calibration schemes of a newly developed upper-air radiosonde instrument, “Storm Tracker” (ST), with data collected in field observations during 2016–2022. The ST is a radiosonde instrument developed and tested in 2016 (Hwang et al., 2020). In a series of field campaigns in the Taiwan area, more than one thousand co-launches of ST and Vaisala RS41-SGP (VS) are conducted. Using the VS measurements as the reference, we developed data correction methods and examined the characteristics of the ST sounding. The corrected ST soundings have 1-K temperature and 7 % relative humidity root mean square difference to the VS soundings. These error differences can be reduced to 0.66-K and 4.61 % below the 700-hPa height. The GPS estimated ST wind error difference is about 0.05 ms-1. The results suggested that the ST can perform similarly to the reference sounding and has reached the level required for environmental sampling and scientific research. The geostrophic adjustment dynamics indicate that the spatial temperature variation in the free atmosphere may not be large. However, the lower atmosphere may have large wind, temperature, and moisture variations. Due to the relatively low cost and accuracy after correction, ST can complement regular upper-air observations for high spatial and temporal resolution.
- Preprint
(1372 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 May 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-661', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Apr 2024
reply
The manuscript "Data quality control and calibration for mini-radiosonde system Storm Tracker in Taiwan" describes
a twin sounding campaign of the Storm Tracker and the Vaisala RS41 radiosonde, where the latter is used as reference.
The results of the twinsoundings are used to derive a correction for the Storm Tracker temperature and humidity profiles, using a statistical method based on the cumulative distribution function (CDF).
I have considerable concerns with the way the twinsoundings were performed (payload configuration) as well as the applied analysis method, both of which I think affect the results and conclusions of this study.One concern is with the method applied to analyse the data from the coincident twinsoudings. Since
these soundings are performed with two different radiosondes on the same balloon, this allows for a
direct comparison of the profile data. Using a statistical method like the cumulative distribution
function (CDF) seems to me like an unnecessary complication. To my understanding the CDF-based
method as employed by Ciesielski et al., is applied when comparing radiosonde data taken under
similar meteorological conditions albeit not coincidently on the same rig.
The advantage of coincident twinsounding data is that it allows to directly determine the bias +
associated uncertainty between both systems. Furthermore, the physical mechanism that is causing
the bias between both radiosondes is warming by solar radiation that is counteracted by convective
cooling by the air flowing over the sensor (ventilation). The efficiency of the convective cooling
is directly linked to the altitude-dependent ambient air pressure. The CDF method that is applied
in the manuscript does indeed derive corrections for pressure ranges, but the purpose of further
analysing the differences in sense of ambient temperature is not clear to me.For full comment/report see supplement.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 | 18 | 9 | 115 | 8 | 6 |
- HTML: 88
- PDF: 18
- XML: 9
- Total: 115
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1