the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
On the atmospheric budget of ethylene dichloride and its impact on stratospheric chlorine and ozone (2002–2020)
Abstract. Ethylene dichloride (EDC), or 1-2-dichloroethane, is an industrial very short-lived substance (VSLS) whose major use is as a feedstock in the production chain of polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Like other chlorinated VSLS, transport of EDC (or its atmospheric oxidation products) to the stratosphere could contribute to ozone depletion there. However, despite annual production volumes greatly exceeding those of more prominent VSLS (e.g. dichloromethane), global EDC observations are sparse, thus the magnitude and distribution of EDC emissions and trends in its atmospheric abundance are poorly known. In this study we performed an exploratory analysis of the global EDC budget between 2002 and 2020. Combining bottom-up data on annual production and assumptions around fugitive losses during production and feedstock use, we assessed the EDC source strength required to reproduce atmospheric EDC observations. We show that the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT 3-D chemical transport model (CTM) reproduces EDC measurements from various aircraft missions well, including HIPPO (2009–2011), ATom (2016–2018) and KORUS-AQ (2016), along with surface measurements from South East Asia, when assuming a regionally varying production emission factor in the range 0.5–1.5 %. Our findings imply substantial fugitive losses of EDC and/or substantial emissive applications (e.g. solvent use) that are poorly reported. We estimate EDC’s global source increased by ~45 % between 2002 (349±61 Gg/yr) and 2020 (505±90 Gg/yr) with its contribution to stratospheric chlorine increasing from 8.2 (±1.5) ppt Cl to ~12.9 (±2.4) ppt Cl over this period. EDC’s relatively short overall tropospheric lifetime (~83 days) limits, though does not preclude, its transport to the stratosphere and we show that its impact on ozone is small at present. Annually averaged, EDC is estimated to have decreased ozone in the lower stratosphere by up to several ppb (<1 %) in 2020, though a larger effect in the springtime Southern Hemisphere polar lower stratosphere is apparent (decreases of up to ~1.3 %). Given strong potential for growth in EDC production tied to demand for PVC, ongoing measurements would be of benefit to monitor potential future increases in its atmospheric abundance and its contribution to ozone depletion.
- Preprint
(1433 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(490 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-560', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Apr 2024
The paper by Hossaini et al al presents a detailed study of 1,2, Dichloroethane, also often referred to as ethylene dichloride. It uses a chemical transport model, atmospheric observations and estimates of production and emission rates to derive an atmospheric budget. The paper is well written and the assumptions and the methods are well justified. I have a few issues, which are more of technical nature concerning the data used which I would like the authors to clarify. One further issue is that I do not like the use of the name ethylenedichloride, which is not a systematic name and also not a specific name. I suggest to use 1,2-dichloroethane instead, which is the correct name and also clearer as it is clear that it is the unsymmetrically substituted compound. Most importantly, I would like the authors to discuss little bit more about the data quality (sample stability and comparison of calibration scales). Apart from that I only have a few minor issues below. I recommend the paper to be accepted after minor revisions.
Specific
l. 203: is ethene mainly of anthropogenic origin? or are there significant natural sources?
section 2.4.: please include some information on the calibration scales used for the measurements and the comparability of the different observations from three different groups. Are they all on the same scale? Also, has the stability of 1,2-dichloroethane in the samples been analysed?
l. 270: does this mean that only the data below 3 km of HIPPO and ATOM were used? Why have the free tropospheric data not been used?
l. 371, Fiugure 4: I could not find the blue shaded region to represent the model scenario ranges.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-560-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-560/egusphere-2024-560-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
-
RC2: 'Review of the manuscript “On the atmospheric budget of ethylene dichloride and its impact on stratospheric chlorine and ozone (2002-2020)” by Hossaini et al., 2024.', Rafael Pedro Fernandez, 23 Apr 2024
The manuscript presents the development of a new bottom-up emission inventory for 1-2 dichloroethane (EDC) with enhanced spatial and temporal resolution compared with previous studies. An increasing trend in the global annual flux of EDC between 2002 and 2020 is determined based on regionally distributed production and consumption data. The new inventory is used in TOMCAT to estimate the Source Gas (SGI) and Product Gas (PGI) Injection of chlorine to the stratosphere, which results in a small (<1%) but not negligible impact on stratospheric ozone. The paper is very well organized, referenced and written, and certainly of interest for the community. Therefore, I suggest the work to be accepted with minor revisions. In the attached document, I provide a couple of general comments that might help to enhance the work visibility, and a list of minor and/or technical comments to be addressed.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-560/egusphere-2024-560-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-560', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Apr 2024
The paper by Hossaini et al al presents a detailed study of 1,2, Dichloroethane, also often referred to as ethylene dichloride. It uses a chemical transport model, atmospheric observations and estimates of production and emission rates to derive an atmospheric budget. The paper is well written and the assumptions and the methods are well justified. I have a few issues, which are more of technical nature concerning the data used which I would like the authors to clarify. One further issue is that I do not like the use of the name ethylenedichloride, which is not a systematic name and also not a specific name. I suggest to use 1,2-dichloroethane instead, which is the correct name and also clearer as it is clear that it is the unsymmetrically substituted compound. Most importantly, I would like the authors to discuss little bit more about the data quality (sample stability and comparison of calibration scales). Apart from that I only have a few minor issues below. I recommend the paper to be accepted after minor revisions.
Specific
l. 203: is ethene mainly of anthropogenic origin? or are there significant natural sources?
section 2.4.: please include some information on the calibration scales used for the measurements and the comparability of the different observations from three different groups. Are they all on the same scale? Also, has the stability of 1,2-dichloroethane in the samples been analysed?
l. 270: does this mean that only the data below 3 km of HIPPO and ATOM were used? Why have the free tropospheric data not been used?
l. 371, Fiugure 4: I could not find the blue shaded region to represent the model scenario ranges.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-560-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-560/egusphere-2024-560-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
-
RC2: 'Review of the manuscript “On the atmospheric budget of ethylene dichloride and its impact on stratospheric chlorine and ozone (2002-2020)” by Hossaini et al., 2024.', Rafael Pedro Fernandez, 23 Apr 2024
The manuscript presents the development of a new bottom-up emission inventory for 1-2 dichloroethane (EDC) with enhanced spatial and temporal resolution compared with previous studies. An increasing trend in the global annual flux of EDC between 2002 and 2020 is determined based on regionally distributed production and consumption data. The new inventory is used in TOMCAT to estimate the Source Gas (SGI) and Product Gas (PGI) Injection of chlorine to the stratosphere, which results in a small (<1%) but not negligible impact on stratospheric ozone. The paper is very well organized, referenced and written, and certainly of interest for the community. Therefore, I suggest the work to be accepted with minor revisions. In the attached document, I provide a couple of general comments that might help to enhance the work visibility, and a list of minor and/or technical comments to be addressed.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-560/egusphere-2024-560-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ryan Hossaini, 10 Jul 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
588 | 177 | 36 | 801 | 53 | 18 | 17 |
- HTML: 588
- PDF: 177
- XML: 36
- Total: 801
- Supplement: 53
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1