the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Exploring the opportunities and challenges of using large language models to represent institutional agency in land system modelling
Abstract. Public policy institutions play crucial roles in the land system, but modelling their policy-making processes is challenging. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a novel approach to simulating many different types of human decision-making, including policy choices. This paper aims to investigate the opportunities and challenges that LLMs bring to land system modelling by integrating LLM-powered institutional agents within an agent-based, land use model. Four types of LLM agents are examined, all of which, in the examples presented here, use taxes to steer meat production toward a target level. The LLM agents provide reasoning and policy action output. The agents’ performance is benchmarked against two baseline scenarios: one without policy interventions and another implementing optimal policy actions determined through a genetic algorithm. The findings show that while LLM agents perform better than the non-intervention scenario, they fall short of the performance achieved by optimal policy actions. However, LLM agents demonstrate behaviour and decision-making, marked by policy consistency and transparent reasoning. This includes generating strategies such as incrementalism, delayed policy action, proactive policy adjustments, and balancing multiple stakeholder interests. Agents equipped with experiential learning capabilities excel in achieving policy objectives through progressive policy actions. The order in which reasoning and proposed policy actions are output has a notable effect on the agents’ performance, suggesting that enforced reasoning guides as well as explains LLM decisions. The approach presented here points to promising opportunities and significant challenges. The opportunities include, exploring naturalistic institutional decision-making, handling massive institutional documents, and human-AI cooperation. Challenges mainly lie in the scalability, interpretability, and reliability of LLMs.
- Preprint
(2119 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-449', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Apr 2024
In this manuscript, the authors describe their work inducing a large language model to “role-play” as various kinds of policy decisionmakers in an agent-based land use model. While a human operator needs to stay in the loop to keep the LLM on task and producing output in the correct format, the agents—when properly prompted—are capable of producing policy actions that achieve their goal. As befits such a novel method, the authors do more than just using the policy actions output by the model; they also dig in to the apparent “reasoning” behind its actions.
This is a fascinating piece of research. The paper is composed logically, well-written, and the figures are clear. However, I do have a number of comments, the most important of which relate to the manuscript’s eliding of how LLMs actually work. Once these are addressed, though, it will stand as an important, foundational contribution to the use of LLMs in agent-based land use modeling.
Please see the attached PDF for my comments.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Dear Reviewer,
We are grateful for your prompt and thorough review of our manuscript. Your insightful feedback has been invaluable in refining our work.
We also thank you for your patience. We initially planned to respond once all reviews were secured to address feedback comprehensively. However, as this research spans multiple disciplines, finding reviewers in this new domain was challenging. We are grateful to the journal’s editor for their efforts in securing reviews, enabling us to proceed.
We are committed to addressing the comments thoroughly to ensure the work makes a meaningful contribution to this evolving field. In the PDF attached, we outline our approach to addressing your comments point by point.
Sincerely,
The authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
-
CC1: 'Generalisability & scalability', Oliver Perkins, 13 Apr 2024
Dear authors,
I greatly enjoyed reading this impressive work. Please find enclosed some questions and comments, which relate primarily to the scalability and generalisability of what you have achieved here.
All best
Ol Perkins
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Thank you for your comments. As per your suggestion, we have incorporated the detailed answers to your questions in "Reply on RC2".
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-449-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-449', Oliver Perkins, 12 Nov 2024
Please see attached file. Please disregard my prior community comment, which has been incorporated into this new file.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your detailed review of our manuscript. Your feedback has provided valuable insights that will help us improve the clarity and impact of our work.
As our research spans multiple disciplines, your expertise and constructive suggestions are especially appreciated. We have carefully reviewed your comments and are committed to addressing them thoroughly. In the PDF attached, we outline our responses to your major and minor comments.
Sincerely,
The authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-449', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Apr 2024
In this manuscript, the authors describe their work inducing a large language model to “role-play” as various kinds of policy decisionmakers in an agent-based land use model. While a human operator needs to stay in the loop to keep the LLM on task and producing output in the correct format, the agents—when properly prompted—are capable of producing policy actions that achieve their goal. As befits such a novel method, the authors do more than just using the policy actions output by the model; they also dig in to the apparent “reasoning” behind its actions.
This is a fascinating piece of research. The paper is composed logically, well-written, and the figures are clear. However, I do have a number of comments, the most important of which relate to the manuscript’s eliding of how LLMs actually work. Once these are addressed, though, it will stand as an important, foundational contribution to the use of LLMs in agent-based land use modeling.
Please see the attached PDF for my comments.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Dear Reviewer,
We are grateful for your prompt and thorough review of our manuscript. Your insightful feedback has been invaluable in refining our work.
We also thank you for your patience. We initially planned to respond once all reviews were secured to address feedback comprehensively. However, as this research spans multiple disciplines, finding reviewers in this new domain was challenging. We are grateful to the journal’s editor for their efforts in securing reviews, enabling us to proceed.
We are committed to addressing the comments thoroughly to ensure the work makes a meaningful contribution to this evolving field. In the PDF attached, we outline our approach to addressing your comments point by point.
Sincerely,
The authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
-
CC1: 'Generalisability & scalability', Oliver Perkins, 13 Apr 2024
Dear authors,
I greatly enjoyed reading this impressive work. Please find enclosed some questions and comments, which relate primarily to the scalability and generalisability of what you have achieved here.
All best
Ol Perkins
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Thank you for your comments. As per your suggestion, we have incorporated the detailed answers to your questions in "Reply on RC2".
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-449-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-449', Oliver Perkins, 12 Nov 2024
Please see attached file. Please disregard my prior community comment, which has been incorporated into this new file.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your detailed review of our manuscript. Your feedback has provided valuable insights that will help us improve the clarity and impact of our work.
As our research spans multiple disciplines, your expertise and constructive suggestions are especially appreciated. We have carefully reviewed your comments and are committed to addressing them thoroughly. In the PDF attached, we outline our responses to your major and minor comments.
Sincerely,
The authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Yongchao Zeng, 24 Dec 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
539 | 227 | 36 | 802 | 49 | 26 |
- HTML: 539
- PDF: 227
- XML: 36
- Total: 802
- BibTeX: 49
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1