the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Using reduced-complexity volcanic aerosol and climate models to produce large ensemble simulations of Holocene temperature
Abstract. Volcanic eruptions are one of the most important drivers of climate variability, but climate model simulations typically show stronger surface cooling than proxy-based reconstructions. Uncertainties associated with eruption source parameters, aerosol-climate modelling and internal climate variability might explain those discrepancies but their quantification using complex global climate models is computationally expensive. In this study, we combine a reduced-complexity volcanic aerosol model (EVA_H) and a climate model (FaIR) to simulate global mean surface temperature from 6755 BCE to 1900 CE (8705 to 50 BP) accounting for volcanic forcing, solar irradiance, orbital, ice sheet, greenhouse gases and land-use forcing. The models’ negligible computational cost enables us to use a Monte Carlo approach to propagate uncertainties associated with eruption source parameters, aerosol and climate model parameterisations, and internal climate variability. Over the last 9000 years, we obtain a global-mean volcanic forcing of -0.15 W.m-2 and an associated surface cooling of 0.12 K. For the 14 largest eruptions (injecting more than 20 Tg of SO2) of 1250 CE – 1900 CE, a superposed epoch analysis reveals an excellent agreement on the mean temperature response between our simulations, scaled to Northern Hemisphere summer temperature, and tree ring-based reconstructions. For individual eruptions, discrepancies between the simulated and reconstructed surface temperature response are almost always within uncertainties. At multi-millennial timescales, our simulations reproduce the Holocene global warming trend, but exhibit some discrepancies on centennial to millennial timescales. In particular, the Medieval Climate Anomaly to Little Ice Age transition is weaker in our simulations, and we also do not capture a relatively cool period in climate reanalyses between 3000 BCE and 1000 BCE (5000 and 3000 BP). We discuss how uncertainties in land-use forcing and model limitations might explain these differences. Our study demonstrates the value of reduced-complexity volcanic aerosol-climate models to simulate climate at annual to multi-millennial timescales.
- Preprint
(1968 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1588 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3635', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Jan 2025
reply
Comments on: Using reduced-complexity volcanic aerosol and climate models to produce large ensemble simulations of Holocene temperature
Verkerk and coauthors combine reduced-complexity volcanic aerosol (EVA_H) and climate (FaIR) models to simulate the global mean surface temperature (GMST) response to volcanic eruptions over the last 9,000 years (6755 BCE to 1900 CE).
To assess the robustness of their simulations, the authors compare their estimates for the 14 largest eruptions between 1250 CE and 1900 CE with numerous climate reconstructions (Schneider et al., 2015; Wilson et al., 2016; Guillet et al., 2017; Pages2k, 2019; King et al., 2021). The discrepancies between the new simulations and climate reconstructions are notably smaller than in previous studies.
The authors address an important topic. The paper is well-written, well-structured, and easy to follow. The figures are clear and informative. And the authors have made all their simulations publicly available.
The methodology section summarizes well the approach taken by the authors, including the forcing datasets used for the new simulations, the paleo-reconstructions and the climate simulations employed to compare the new results.
Additionally, they acknowledge the limitations of their approach, particularly the Holocene temperature conundrum, which is also apparent in their ensemble simulations of Holocene temperatures.
The authors emphasize the need for future products based on reduced-complexity models to include seasonal and regional outputs, which would be highly valuable for the paleo community.
I appreciated reading the manuscript and, overall, have very few comments to offer. I recommend the paper for acceptance, as I think the new product provided by the authors represents a valuable resource for the paleo community studying past volcanic eruptions. However, I do have one minor suggestion for the authors to consider.
Main text:
- Comparing simulations with instrumental data: Pushing the simulations beyond 1900 CE would have been a great addition. Extending the simulations into the 20th century would allow direct comparisons with instrumental data for eruptions such as the 1902 (Santa María), 1912 (Katmai/Novarupta), 1963 (Agung), and 1991 (Pinatubo) events. They could help validate the accuracy of the simulations.
Have the authors considered the possibility of comparing the accuracy of their simulations not only against climate/data assimilation reconstructions but also against instrumental datasets, such as the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) dataset? The BEST dataset offers two products that might be of interest: one estimating GMST since 1850 and another providing annual temperature estimates since 1750 (land-only).
Using these datasets could allow the authors to compare their simulations for the 1815 Tambora, 1831 Zavaritskii (Hutchison et al., 2024), and 1883 Krakatau events with “real” temperature observations. Additionally, the Laki eruption might also be investigated, assuming the instrumental records used by BEST are sufficiently dense to represent a reliable global average (which I am not entirely certain about).
- Line 130: Change Hutchison et al., in review to Hutchison et al., 2024
Supplementary Material
- Line 60: “Table S3: Integrated response of the superposed epoch analysis (Error! Reference source not found.d).” There appears to be a reference issue here that should be corrected.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3635-RC1
Data sets
Large ensemble simulations of Holocene temperature and volcanic forcing Magali Verkerk et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14170013
Model code and software
FaIR reduced complexity climate model Chris Smith https://github.com/OMS-NetZero/FAIR/tree/v2.1.4
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
196 | 32 | 6 | 234 | 40 | 3 | 2 |
- HTML: 196
- PDF: 32
- XML: 6
- Total: 234
- Supplement: 40
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1