the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying the Oscillatory Evolution of Simulated Boundary-Layer Cloud Fields Using Gaussian Process Regression
Abstract. Average properties of the cloud field, such as cloud size distribution and cloud fraction, have previously been observed to show periodic, oscillatory changes. Identifying this behaviour, however, remains difficult due to the intrinsic variability of the boundary-layer cloud distribution. We use the Gaussian Process (GP) regression to identify this oscillatory behaviour in the statistical distributions of individual cloud properties. Individual cloud samples are retrieved from high-resolution LES model results, and the distribution of cloud sizes is modelled as a power-law distribution. We construct the time-series for the slope of the cloud size distribution b, a slope that is consistent with satellite observations of marine boundary-layer clouds, by observing the changes in the slope of the modelled cloud size distribution. Then, we build a GP model based on prior assumptions about the cloud field following observational studies: a boundary-layer cloud field goes through a phase of relatively strong convection where large clouds dominate, followed by a phase of relatively weak convection where precipitation causes formation of cold pools and suppression of convective growth. The GP model successfully identifies oscillatory motions from the noisy time-series, with a period of 95 ± 3.2 minutes. Furthermore, we examine the time-series of cloud fraction fc and average vertical mass flux M, whose periods were 93 ± 2.5 and 93 ± 3.7 minutes, respectively. The oscillations reveal the role of precipitation in governing convective activities through recharge-discharge cycles.
- Preprint
(7006 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-352', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 May 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Gunho Oh, 25 Jun 2024
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-352 - No Compliance with GMD's policy', Juan Antonio Añel, 11 May 2024
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and DOI) as soon as possible, as it should be available before the Discussions stage. Also, please, include the relevant primary input/output data.In this way, if you do not fix this problem, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal. I should note that, given this lack of compliance with our policy, your manuscript should not have been accepted in Discussions. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular.
Also, you must include in a potentially reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section, the DOI of the code (and another DOI for the dataset if necessary).
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-352-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gunho Oh, 28 May 2024
Hello,
As requested, I have uploaded the primary input and output data to Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11355002), available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11355002. This record contains all input parameters needed to reproduce the model run used in the manuscript, as well as the primary output from the model run.
I have also uploaded the code used for the post-processing of the output data and Jupyter notebooks used to produce the figures in the manuscript (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11356150), available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11356150.
Both records are identical to the Github repositories initially submitted, but are now hosted on Zenodo as suggested.
The 'Code and Data Availability' section will be added to the potentially reviewed manuscript including the information about the records above.
Thanks,
Loren.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-352-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gunho Oh, 28 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-352', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Jun 2024
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Gunho Oh, 25 Jun 2024
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-352', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 May 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Gunho Oh, 25 Jun 2024
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-352 - No Compliance with GMD's policy', Juan Antonio Añel, 11 May 2024
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and DOI) as soon as possible, as it should be available before the Discussions stage. Also, please, include the relevant primary input/output data.In this way, if you do not fix this problem, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal. I should note that, given this lack of compliance with our policy, your manuscript should not have been accepted in Discussions. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular.
Also, you must include in a potentially reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section, the DOI of the code (and another DOI for the dataset if necessary).
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-352-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gunho Oh, 28 May 2024
Hello,
As requested, I have uploaded the primary input and output data to Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11355002), available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11355002. This record contains all input parameters needed to reproduce the model run used in the manuscript, as well as the primary output from the model run.
I have also uploaded the code used for the post-processing of the output data and Jupyter notebooks used to produce the figures in the manuscript (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11356150), available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11356150.
Both records are identical to the Github repositories initially submitted, but are now hosted on Zenodo as suggested.
The 'Code and Data Availability' section will be added to the potentially reviewed manuscript including the information about the records above.
Thanks,
Loren.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-352-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gunho Oh, 28 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-352', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Jun 2024
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Gunho Oh, 25 Jun 2024
Model code and software
SAM Loren Oh https://github.com/lorenghoh/sam_loh
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
351 | 79 | 37 | 467 | 18 | 24 |
- HTML: 351
- PDF: 79
- XML: 37
- Total: 467
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1