the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Understanding the Long-term Trend of Organic Aerosol and the Influences from Anthropogenic Emission and Regional Climate Change in China
Abstract. Organic aerosol (OA) is a major type of fine particulate matter. OA shows a large variability influenced by anthropogenic emissions, vegetation, and meteorological changes. Understanding OA trends is crucial for air quality and climate studies, yet changes in OA over time in China are poorly documented. This study applied the Community Atmosphere Model version 6 with comprehensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM6-Chem) to investigate long-term OA trends in China from 1990 to 2019 and identify the driving factors. The simulations agreed well with ground-based measurements of OA from 151 observational sites and the CAQRA reanalysis dataset. Although OA trends showed a modest 5.6 % increase, this resulted from a significant -8.1 % decrease in primary organic aerosols (POA) and a substantial 32.3 % increase in secondary organic aerosols (SOA). Anthropogenic emissions of POA and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were the dominant contributors to these trends. While biogenic VOCs (BVOCs) played a secondary role in SOA formation, significant changes were observed in specific sub-species: isoprene-derived SOA decreased by -18.8 % due to anthropogenic sulfate reduction, while monoterpene-derived SOA increased by 12.3 % driven by enhanced emissions from rising temperatures. Our study found through sensitivity experiments a negligible response of monoterpene-derived SOA to changes in anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions as a net effect of changes in multiple pathways. This study highlights the complex interplay between POA reduction and SOA growth, revealing notable OA trends in China and the varying roles of both anthropogenic and biogenic emissions.
- Preprint
(5017 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(11657 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 26 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Review of "Understanding the Long-term Trend of Organic Aerosol and the Influences from Anthropogenic Emission and Regional Climate Change in China" (egusphere-2024-3420)', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Nov 2024
reply
** General comments **
The authors use CAM6-Chem to explore regional trends in organic aerosol concentrations over China. In addition to quantifying the trends, they discuss reasons for the trends.
Following minor revisions, the paper could be a useful contribution to the scientific literature.
** Specific comments **
1. In the data availability statement, I have been unable to identify where the authors' CAM6-Chem model data can be accessed. Should the relevant model data not be published to comply with ACP's data policy and support reproducibility? Would it also be possible to publish the analysis code used to produce the figures?
2. The clarity of some of the figures could be improved. Ideally, each figure should be understandable without referring to the caption. To improve readability, I offer the following suggestions:
(i) give each subfigure panel a short title (as has been done in e.g. Fig. 2, but not Figs. 1 & 7);
(ii) label colorbars with units;
(iii) explain the difference between the solid and dashed lines in the Fig. 1e legend (not just the caption);
(iv) share colorbars across subfigure panels where possible (as has been done in e.g. Fig. 3a–c, but not Fig. 2a–c);
(v) use the same y-axis limits in Fig. 9a and 9b.3. The precision of the numbers in the Fig. 1c colorbar (-1.80 to 1.80) differs from that in Fig. 1f (-1.8 to 1.8). Should they not be consistent?
4. In Fig. 4, why are normal distributions fitted? The normal distribution does not provide a good approximation to the underlying empirical distributions. The exponential distribution may be more appropriate.
5. The number of acronymns may be overwhelming to many readers. Is it possible to use fewer acronyms? For example, could "PRD" be replaced by "Pearl River Delta" throughout the paper?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3420-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3420', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Dec 2024
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3420/egusphere-2024-3420-RC2-supplement.pdf
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
147 | 34 | 8 | 189 | 12 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 147
- PDF: 34
- XML: 8
- Total: 189
- Supplement: 12
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1