the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The impact of organic nitrates on summer ozone formation in Shanghai, China
Abstract. Organic nitrates serve as important secondary oxidation products in the atmosphere, playing a crucial role in the atmospheric radical cycles and influencing the production of secondary pollutants (ozone (O3) and secondary organic aerosols). However, field measurements of organic nitrates are scarce in China, and a comprehensive localized mechanism for organic nitrates is absent, hindering effective pollution mitigation strategies. In this study, we conducted measurements of ambient gaseous organic nitrates and examined their effects on local O3 production at a polluted urban site in eastern China during summer. The average daytime concentrations of alkyl nitrates (ANs) and peroxy nitrates (PNs) throughout the campaign were 0.5±0.3 ppbv and 0.9±0.7 ppbv, respectively, with peaks reaching up to 1.6 ppbv and 3.6 ppbv. An observation-constrained box model, incorporating an updated mechanism for organic nitrates, was employed to assess the environmental impact of these compounds. The model results indicated that PNs production inhibited the daytime O3 production by 16 % (0.8 ppbv/h), which is relatively low compared to previous studies. Furthermore, scenario analyses revealed that production yields (α) of ANs would alter the response of O3 formation to precursors due to varying compositions of volatile organic compounds. Our results suggest that blind pollution control may cause ineffective pollution prevention and highlight the necessity of a thorough understanding on organic nitrate chemistry for local O3 control strategy.
- Preprint
(1571 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(270 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3337', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Nov 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3337/egusphere-2024-3337-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3337', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Nov 2024
This study conducted field measurements of gaseous organic nitrates at an urban site and assessed their effects on local O3 production using a box model incorporating an updated mechanism. Organic nitrates formation and its contribution to SOA and effect on O3 are of great concern to the researchers. My main question about this work is the performance of the model simulations. The author used three mechanisms to simulate ONs, but as can be seen in Figure 4, the model simulated the concentration levels of ANs but poorly simulated the trend of ANs. It appears that the trend of simulated and observed ANs are opposite. The effectiveness of the model simulation affects the later analysis of ANs and the authors need to give an explanation. What about the R2 of the model simulation? Why does Zare's model that considers the ON formation initiated by OH and NO3 not work well compared to other models? Some specific comments are also provided below.
1, section 3.1, The authors divided the entire campaign into ozone pollution days, clean days, and background days. What are the specific criteria for dividing the clean and background days? How do precursors and environmental factors affect ANs and PNs on different days? The authors are also suggested to compare the effects of ANs and PNs on O3 on different days in the later analysis.
2, Line 242-256, compare ANs and PNs in Shanghai and Xinjin. And Line 329-337, the reduced inhibition of PNs on ozone production in Shanghai compared to Xinjin was attributed to the lower PNs production rate. The authors did not do further modeling analysis here, but it is suggested that the authors provide a reasonable discussion.
3, Line 378-411, The Fig. 10 was missing. Regarding the sensitivity of VOCs reactivity and α to the effect of ANs formation on O3 production, it is suggested that the authors make more comparisons of the results of the most recent studies or those from China. In addition, I would like to know if the authors have tested the sensitivity of VOCs reactivity and α for different days, i.e. ozone pollution, clean and background days and what are the differences in the results?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3337-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 | 65 | 7 | 272 | 29 | 1 | 2 |
- HTML: 200
- PDF: 65
- XML: 7
- Total: 272
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1