the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hydrogen Peroxide Photoformation in Particulate Matter and its Contribution to S(IV) Oxidation During Winter in Fairbanks, Alaska
Abstract. The high levels of sulfate in wintertime particles in Fairbanks, Alaska are a subject of keen research interest and regulatory concern. Recent results from the 2022 ALPACA (Alaska Layered Pollution And Chemical Analysis) field campaign indicate that roughly 40 % of wintertime sulfate in Fairbanks is secondary, with hydrogen peroxide (HOOH) the dominant oxidant. Since formation of HOOH in the gas phase should be negligible during ALPACA because of high levels of NOx, we examined whether reactions within particles could be a significant source of HOOH. To test this, we collected particulate matter (PM) samples during the ALPACA campaign, extracted them, illuminated them with simulated sunlight, and measured HOOH production. Aqueous extracts showed significant light absorption, a result of brown carbon (BrC) from sources such as residential wood combustion. Photoformation rates of HOOH in the PM extracts (normalized to Fairbanks winter sunlight) range from 6 to 71 µM hr-1. While light absorption is nearly independent of pH, HOOH formation rates decrease with increasing pH. Extrapolating to the concentrated conditions of aerosol liquid water (ALW) gives an average rate of in-particle HOOH formation of ~ 0.1 M hr-1. Corresponding rates of sulfate formation from particle-produced HOOH are 0.05 – 0.5 µg m-3 hr-1, accounting for a significant portion of the secondary sulfate production rate. Our results show that HOOH formed in particles is an important contribution to sulfate formation in ambient wintertime particles, even under the low actinic flux conditions typical of winter in subarctic locations like Fairbanks.
- Preprint
(1333 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1008 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3272', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Nov 2024
Overall comments:
The authors studied HOOH photo-formation in aerosol extracts collected in Fairbanks, Alaska. The photo-formation rates are very fast because they used smaller amounts of acidic solution to extract chemicals in the aerosols, i.e., larger absorptivity over the 310–550 nm range. The fast HOOH photo-formation is likely to significantly contribute to S(IV) oxidation, even in the aerosols of high-latitude atmospheres. The authors also calculated the quantum yields of HOOH photo-formation to be about 0.001 at pH 1, a typical aerosol pH. This information is quite valuable and useful for estimating HOOH photo-formation in aerosols. The reviewer believes that the results presented in the manuscript are interesting and add valuable information to the environmental and atmospheric chemistry communities, likely stimulating further studies. Thus, the reviewer recommends the publication of this manuscript after the authors address the minor comments listed below in the revised manuscript.
Detailed comment:
Page 4, Line 103-104: It is mentioned that Milli-Q water was used for extraction and the extract was used to determine ion composition. Were the metal ion concentrations determined using the Milli-Q extract? Metal ion concentrations may be higher for the pH 1 extract compared to the Milli-Q extract.
Page 13, Line 305-311: The loss rates of HOOH are discussed, and the trend shows slower rates as pH increases. If Fe(II) is a major sink for HOOH, the rates should increase as Fe(OH)+ (a favorable chemical species as pH increases) has faster reaction rate constants compared to Fe2+ (a major species at lower pH). The reviewer assumes that only inorganic Fe(II) is considered. In the aerosol extracts, it may be possible that, since DOC is much higher in the aerosol extracts, a large fraction of Fe(II) may be bound to organics, and the Fe(II)-organic complexes may have similar reaction rate constants to that of Fe2+ and HOOH.
End of comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3272-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3272', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Dec 2024
General comments:
This paper presents a HOOH formation pathway via illuminating particle extracts, and analyzes its influence factors such as light absorption properties, transition metals, acidity. Then, the authors estimated HOOH formation rates in ambient particles, and confirmed its dominant role in sulfate production. Altogether, the results are meaningful and the paper is clear. I have a number of points that I feel should be addressed.
Specific comments:
- The manuscript is generally well-written, but certain sections can benefit from additional clarification, particularly regarding the H2O2 formation mechanisms involved in the photochemical aging of actual PM2.5 in the introduction (Liu et al., ES&T, 2021, doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04453; Zhang et al., ES&T, 2020, doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01532).
- Line 266-268: Figure 3 should be noted somewhere in this sentence. In addition, there may be a mistake in the caption of Figure 3, i. e., the last sentence: …is shown in Figure S2, not Figure S4.
- Line 297-304: As hydrogen peroxide is a weak acid, I am not sure whether it can be formed via the displacement by strong acid (i. e., sulfuric acid) especially at lower pH. The authors can add some discussion as necessary.
- “Heinlein et al. (in preparation)” was mentioned many times throughout the manuscript, which is not as the solid evidence for your conclusion. If the authors think it is important, the relevant data and results should be added in this study.
- Although I strongly agree with the conclusion that the dominant pathway for secondary sulfate is HOOH oxidation, especially near midday, the authors should compare their findings with actual observational data from previously published literatures. This comparison would enhance the credibility of their results.
- The source of the precursors (e.g., BrC) of HOOH was considered to be mainly from biomass burning or residential wood combustion, but the detailed discussion was lacking in this paper. I suggest the authors had better add them.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3272-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
247 | 78 | 8 | 333 | 37 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 247
- PDF: 78
- XML: 8
- Total: 333
- Supplement: 37
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1