the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Investigation of complex coastline geometry impact on the evolution of storm surges along the east coast of India: A sensitivity study using a numerical model
Abstract. Comprehensive investigation is made on the generation of storm surges along the coast in response to complex coastline geometry using a standalone ADCIRC model. The study initially deals with sensitivity experiments by using various idealized concave/ convex model domains with the same intensity of parallel cyclone tracks. It demonstrates that a sharp curvature along with the landfall location of each track within the domain has more influence on the surge evolution. Peak surges (PS) are generated in the domain for the tracks possessing strong onshore winds, while intense alongshore winds are responsible for PS spreading along the coast. The time evolution of both positive and negative surges along the coast is also demonstrated. The propagation of energy per unit length associated with surge waves is computed for concave coasts to explain the funnelling effect. Development of PS is also seen with actual intricate coastal stretch having concave and convex coastlines along the east coast of India using parallel tracks, which is consistent with that of idealized experiments. Further simulations are carried out along real coastlines with different approach angles of the track exhibit that maximum PS are not always aligned to the right of the track. Depending on track angle, PS may also develop on the left side. Experiments on real coastlines also indicate that PS in the concave coastline is more influenced by cyclone’s radius of maximum winds. Surge generation with different radius of maximum winds is seen to the left side of the track though the cyclone is not making a landfall in this region. Simulation with a recent cyclone, Michaung reveals that occurrence of storm tides is also seen to left of the landfall as the track moves parallel to the coast, which agrees with the observations. This study signifies importance of local coastline configuration, particularly in the concave coasts, on the intensification of storm surges.
- Preprint
(5699 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(183 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2985', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Oct 2024
Dear Editor,
Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript.
The work analyses the interaction between the shape of the coastline (convex/concave) and the trajectories of the cyclones in determining the exacerbation of the related storm surges. The modelling approach followed is robust and well conceived, first with idealized test cases (regualr coastline shapes) and straight cyclon traks, then with real coastline and idealized cyclone tracks. Last a real case. My major remark is about this real case. I would suggest the author to move this case in the section 4 or at the beginning of section 5 to serve as validation of model setup which is then used for the idealized test cases and their discussion.
In the Results and Discussion I would suggest to summarize the vakues of the MPS in tables, in order to make easier the reading of the text. The figures in my opinion need some small adjustments, which are suggested along the manuscript. Several other comments are highlighted along the text, in the attached PDF.
The manuscript is well referenced, well written and mostly easy to read and understand. For this reasons I recommend the manuscript to be eligible for publication after minor revision.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', pawan tiwari, 04 Nov 2024
Thank you for your encouraging comments. As suggested by the reviewer we have moved the real case section in the starting of the section 5. We have added the MPS table in the Results and Discussion section, modified the figures as suggested and addressed the other comments in the attached pdf.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', pawan tiwari, 21 Nov 2024
Thank you very much for your detailed and constructive comments on the manuscript. Your feedback has greatly helped me enhance the overall quality of the work. I truly appreciate the time and effort you invested in providing such valuable insights, which have been instrumental in improving this study. As suggested by the reviewer, we have moved the real case section to the start of the result section. We have added the MPS table in the Results and Discussion section, modified the figures as suggested, and addressed the other comments in the attached pdf.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', pawan tiwari, 04 Nov 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2985', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Nov 2024
This paper discusses the effects of coastline shape and approach angle of a storm on peak storm surge, first using an idealised model, then expanding the analysis to the context of the coastline of India, and finally validates the model using Storm Michaung, a recent cyclone in the region. Previous literature on this topic analyses the effects of concave and convex coastlines on storm surge, while other papers in the field analyse the approach angle of the storm on the peak storm surge. This manuscript takes these analyses further by also considering the sharpness of the curvature of the coastline and combining this with varying the approach angle.
In general, this manuscript addresses some interesting questions regarding the effects of coastal geometry on storm surges, using both idealised and “real world” models, and presents some novel results, along with results that corroborate with those in the aforementioned literature. It should be improved in its discussion of the results, with a more in-depth analysis in the text highlighting how the results fit into the context of the field. The presentation of some of the results also needs improvement.
Overall, I recommend that this manuscript undergoes major revisions regarding the text in the results and discussion sections. Although the results are generally satisfactory and I do not suggest new analysis, the writing needs some significant improvements, which are detailed in the attached file. I hope this is not disheartening since I believe that there are some really interesting results in the paper which are worthy of publication, but I feel that the work needed on the text in some sections will likely require more time than the deadline for minor revisions would allow.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', pawan tiwari, 21 Nov 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2985/egusphere-2024-2985-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', pawan tiwari, 21 Nov 2024
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2985', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Oct 2024
Dear Editor,
Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript.
The work analyses the interaction between the shape of the coastline (convex/concave) and the trajectories of the cyclones in determining the exacerbation of the related storm surges. The modelling approach followed is robust and well conceived, first with idealized test cases (regualr coastline shapes) and straight cyclon traks, then with real coastline and idealized cyclone tracks. Last a real case. My major remark is about this real case. I would suggest the author to move this case in the section 4 or at the beginning of section 5 to serve as validation of model setup which is then used for the idealized test cases and their discussion.
In the Results and Discussion I would suggest to summarize the vakues of the MPS in tables, in order to make easier the reading of the text. The figures in my opinion need some small adjustments, which are suggested along the manuscript. Several other comments are highlighted along the text, in the attached PDF.
The manuscript is well referenced, well written and mostly easy to read and understand. For this reasons I recommend the manuscript to be eligible for publication after minor revision.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', pawan tiwari, 04 Nov 2024
Thank you for your encouraging comments. As suggested by the reviewer we have moved the real case section in the starting of the section 5. We have added the MPS table in the Results and Discussion section, modified the figures as suggested and addressed the other comments in the attached pdf.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', pawan tiwari, 21 Nov 2024
Thank you very much for your detailed and constructive comments on the manuscript. Your feedback has greatly helped me enhance the overall quality of the work. I truly appreciate the time and effort you invested in providing such valuable insights, which have been instrumental in improving this study. As suggested by the reviewer, we have moved the real case section to the start of the result section. We have added the MPS table in the Results and Discussion section, modified the figures as suggested, and addressed the other comments in the attached pdf.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', pawan tiwari, 04 Nov 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2985', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Nov 2024
This paper discusses the effects of coastline shape and approach angle of a storm on peak storm surge, first using an idealised model, then expanding the analysis to the context of the coastline of India, and finally validates the model using Storm Michaung, a recent cyclone in the region. Previous literature on this topic analyses the effects of concave and convex coastlines on storm surge, while other papers in the field analyse the approach angle of the storm on the peak storm surge. This manuscript takes these analyses further by also considering the sharpness of the curvature of the coastline and combining this with varying the approach angle.
In general, this manuscript addresses some interesting questions regarding the effects of coastal geometry on storm surges, using both idealised and “real world” models, and presents some novel results, along with results that corroborate with those in the aforementioned literature. It should be improved in its discussion of the results, with a more in-depth analysis in the text highlighting how the results fit into the context of the field. The presentation of some of the results also needs improvement.
Overall, I recommend that this manuscript undergoes major revisions regarding the text in the results and discussion sections. Although the results are generally satisfactory and I do not suggest new analysis, the writing needs some significant improvements, which are detailed in the attached file. I hope this is not disheartening since I believe that there are some really interesting results in the paper which are worthy of publication, but I feel that the work needed on the text in some sections will likely require more time than the deadline for minor revisions would allow.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', pawan tiwari, 21 Nov 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2985/egusphere-2024-2985-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', pawan tiwari, 21 Nov 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
155 | 65 | 113 | 333 | 15 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 155
- PDF: 65
- XML: 113
- Total: 333
- Supplement: 15
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1