Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2908
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2908
10 Oct 2024
 | 10 Oct 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

The quantification of downhole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry

Jarred Cain Lloyd, Carl Spandler, Sarah E. Gilbert, and Derrick Hasterok

Abstract. Downhole fractionation (DHF), a known phenomenon in static spot laser ablation, remains one of the most significant sources of uncertainty for laser-based geochronology. A given DHF pattern is unique to a set of conditions, including material, inter-element analyte pair, laser conditions, and spot volume/diameter. Current modelling methods (simple or complex linear models, spline-based modelling) for DHF do not readily lend themselves to uncertainty propagation, nor do they allow for quantitative inter-session comparison, let alone inter-laboratory or inter-material comparison.

In this study, we investigate the application of orthogonal polynomial decomposition for quantitative modelling of LA-ICP-MS DHF patterns with application to an exemplar U–Pb dataset across a range of materials and analytical sessions. We outline the algorithm used to compute the models and provide a brief interpretation of the resulting data. We demonstrate that it is possible to quantitatively compare the DHF patterns of multiple materials across multiple sessions accurately, and use uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) to help visualise this large dataset.

We demonstrate that the algorithm presented advances our capability to accurately model LA-ICP-MS DHF and may enable reliable decoupling of the DHF correction for non-matrix matched materials, improved uncertainty propagation, and inter-laboratory comparison. The generalised nature of the algorithm means it is applicable not only to geochronology but also more broadly within the geosciences where predictable linear relationships exist.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Jarred Cain Lloyd, Carl Spandler, Sarah E. Gilbert, and Derrick Hasterok

Status: open (until 21 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jarred Cain Lloyd, Carl Spandler, Sarah E. Gilbert, and Derrick Hasterok

Data sets

Raw and derived data: The quantification of downhole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry Jarred Lloyd and Sarah Gilbert https://doi.org/10.25909/26778298

Supplementary analyte signal figures - The quantification of downhole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry Jarred Lloyd https://doi.org/10.25909/26778592

Supplementary Figures - The quantification of downhole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry Jarred Lloyd https://doi.org/10.25909/27041821

Model code and software

Julia scripts - The quantification of downhole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry Jarred Lloyd https://doi.org/10.25909/26779255

Jarred Cain Lloyd, Carl Spandler, Sarah E. Gilbert, and Derrick Hasterok

Viewed

Total article views: 79 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
61 16 2 79 0 1
  • HTML: 61
  • PDF: 16
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 79
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Oct 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Oct 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 75 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 75 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
Laser-based dating of rocks and minerals is invaluable in geoscience. This study presents a significant advancement in our ability to model and correct for a process called downhole fractionation (DHF) that can impact the accuracy and uncertainty of dates. We develop an algorithm that quantitatively models DHF patterns. The implications are far-reaching: improved accuracy, reduced uncertainty, and easier comparisons between different samples and laboratories.