the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The surface tension and CCN activation of sea spray aerosol particles
Abstract. In marine environments, sea spray aerosol (SSA) particles have been found to contain surface-active substances (surfactants) originating from the sea surface microlayer. These surfactants can lower the surface tension of the SSA particles, facilitating their activation to cloud droplets. This effect is not considered in classical Köhler theory, which assumes droplets to be homogeneous with a surface tension of pure water. In this study the CCN activity of SSA particles calculated with classical Köhler theory is compared to a more complex calculation that considers bulk–surface partitioning, surface tension lowering, and liquid–liquid phase separation. The model approach presented here combines the multi-component Eberhart model for surface tension with the Monolayer model and an activity model (AIOMFAC). This combination allows for the first time to calculate Köhler curves of surfactant-containing particles with a large number of compounds. In a sensitivity study we show that organic compounds can be categorized into weak, intermediate, and strong surfactants for CCN activation based on their separation factor in water S1i and their pure component surface tension σi. For a quaternary model system of SSA particles, it is shown that a high content of hydrophobic organic material (i.e., strong surfactants) in Aitken mode particles does not necessarily prevent good CCN activation, but rather facilitates effective activation via surface tension lowering. Since common climate models use parametrizations that are based on classical Köhler theory, these results suggest that the CCN activity of small SSA particles might be underestimated in climate models.
- Preprint
(1278 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1045 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 30 Oct 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2838', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2024
reply
The surface tension and CCN activation of sea spray aerosol particles by Kleinheins et al. provides predictions of the critical supersaturation for sea spray aerosol. They explore a range of aerosol sizes and compositions reliant to sea spray in addition to droplets containing surfactants of varying strengths. This work uses the Eberhart-Monolayer model to describe the size- and composition-dependent surface tension during cloud droplet activation. The results are indeed interesting and agree with other model predictions. While the Eberhart model has been used to describe the surface tension of bulk solutions and the Monolayer model has been used with other surface tension parameterizations to predict the size- and composition-dependent surfactant partitioning, this work provides the first example of using them together. However, this new combination of modeling methods does not seem to have been validated against data of size-dependent aerosol surface tension or critical supersaturations. Additionally, while the online AIOMFAC model is widely used to predict the water activity of aqueous aerosol, no evidence has been provided to show its utility for the strong surfactants that are modeled in this work. While the results in this manuscript are interesting, some of the statements regarding the results may be too strong if these questions cannot be addressed. A list of specific comments are included below.
- First paragraph of section 2.1 – the first statement is too strong. Whether the surface tension is lowered depends on the size and composition of the particle as bulk depletion can bring the surface tension back up to that of pure water, even when quantities of surfactant present are sufficient to reduce the surface tension of bulk solutions. The second statement is also subject to the depletion strength.
- Page 4 line 105 – how is the surface activity defined here?
- Page 6 line 155 – Bain et al., 2023 provide an example of the Monolayer Model using a Szyszkowski–Langmuir type isotherm applied to quaternary aerosol droplets.
- Page 6 line 180 – what evidence is there that this simple substitution of SDS with dodecanoic acid is a reasonable approximation? Furthermore, dodecanoic acid is not one of the molecules AIOMFAC is trained with, and it has a much longer hydrophobic tail than anything in the predefined list. Is there evidence that AIOMFAC predictions for something of this size and hydrophobicity are accurate? I have similar questions about oleic acid, which also has a much longer hydrophobic tail than anything in the predefined list.
- Is there any evidence that the Eberhart-Monolayer model accurately predicts size-dependent partitioning in aerosol? By comparison to literature droplet surface tension data for example? The quality of the underlying expression for surface tension can play a large role in the size- and concentration-dependent predictions using the Monolayer partitioning model.
- page 7 line 185 - The model predicts LLPS. Is there any experimental evidence that this is the case?
- page 13 line 210 – SDS is a solid at room temperature, does this mean that this is the only solute that a solid phase density was used? How does using solid phase density impact the results?
- Page 13 line 316 – can the authors provide some context as to why 50 nm dry diameter was selected?
- Page 20 line 444 – “solutes in an aerosol particle are best described by three properties…” can the authors clarify this statement, it is not clear to me how this was determined to be the best. What was it compared to?
- Page 20 line 446 – Can the authors quantify what SScrit lowering to a moderate degree and substantially compared to classical Kohler theory are?
- There are a number of places where the authors refer to surface tension data but then do not cite a source, or cite either El Haber et al., 2024 (which appears to be a review that compiles surface tension data from the literature) or Kleinheins et al., 2023 (a modeling paper again using data available in the literature). References to the primary sources where the data is found must be included.
Typographic corrections
- Page 16 line 363 – please check van’t Hoff factor = 0. Typically, this is equal to 1 when something does not dissociate.
- page 7 line 186 – CMC has not been defined
- Can the authors please check the reference list. The comma after the doi seems to be part of the link, so the links do not work when they are followed. There are also some references with duplicated text.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2838-RC1
Data sets
Data for publication "The surface tension and CCN activation of sea spray aerosol particles" Judith Kleinheins https://zenodo.org/records/13589001
Model code and software
Code for publication "The surface tension and CCN activation of sea spray aerosol particles" Judith Kleinheins https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13588318
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
114 | 27 | 48 | 189 | 17 | 3 | 2 |
- HTML: 114
- PDF: 27
- XML: 48
- Total: 189
- Supplement: 17
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1