the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Linking compound weather extremes to Mediterranean cyclones, fronts and air-streams
Abstract. Mediterranean cyclones are the primary driver of many types of surface weather extremes in the Mediterranean region, the association with extreme rainfall being the most established. Although smaller in size compared to Atlantic cyclones, they share a similar synoptic structure organised in distinct air streams, such as the warm conveyor belt and the dry intrusion, and are associated with low-level temperature fronts. The large-scale characteristics of a Mediterranean cyclone, the properties of the associated airflows, the interaction with the topography around the Mediterranean basin, and the season of occurrence, all contribute in determining its surface impacts. Here, we take these factors into account to establish statistical links between Mediterranean cyclones and weather compounds of two types, namely co-occurring rain-wind and wave-wind extremes. Specifically, compound extremes are attributed to a cyclone if they fall within the system's impact area, using a definition that is expressly tested on Mediterranean cyclones and on the compound selection. Our results show that the majority of Mediterranean compound rain-wind and wave-wind extremes occur in the neighbourhood of a Mediterranean cyclone, with peaks exceeding 80 %; the proportion of cyclone-related compounds is highest when considering transition seasons, and rain-wind events. Winter cyclones show highest compound frequency, matching with the peak winter occurrence of distinctively baroclinic cyclones. A novelty of this work, the de-construction of the cyclones' impact areas based on the presence of objectively-identified air streams and fronts, reveals a high incidence of both types of compound extremes below warm conveyor belt ascent regions, of wave-wind extremes below dry intrusions.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(6763 KB)
-
Supplement
(7799 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(6763 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(7799 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-270', Paolo De Luca, 27 Feb 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-270/egusphere-2024-270-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alice Portal, 22 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-270', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Mar 2024
The authors examine the role of Mediterranean cyclones in the formation of compound extremes from different perspectives including the distance from the event, the dynamic features, and the type of the cyclone.
The paper is beautifully written with a comprehensive discussion of the results that is extensively supported by the literature. I consider that it should be accepted for publication, but there are some points that needs to be corrected or clarified.
Specific comments
- Section 2.1a: Please justify why a coarser temporal and spatial resolution were chosen instead of the available ones from ERA5? The higher resolution wouldn’t provide an added-value in the analysis performed?
- Section 2.1b: As also stated by the authors, negative wave biases are known especially for coastal areas. Why didn’t the authors consider using a much higher resolution dataset for the waves available by Copernicus? I’m afraid that this underestimation could largely affect the frequencies of the wave-wind compounds given that a threshold for wave (i.e., 2m) is set.
- Section 2.4 and in the rest of the text: p(e) is not absolute frequency, it’s relative.
- Unfortunately, almost all figures are difficult to read. I would suggest trying different colour palettes and patterns and/or increase the size.
- I would suggest a proof reading of the text, as there are some errors regarding syntax and, mainly, punctuation.
Minor comments
- Abstract, line 11: What are these peaks? Spatial? Please clarify.
- Abstract, line 11: The “proportion of cyclone-related compounds” over what?
- Abstract in general: I think the abstract does not capture well the content of the paper.
- Line 53: What do you mean with “objective regions”?
- Section 2.2.1: Consider adding a table that could be used as a reference for section 4.3, containing the number of the cluster, the season in which appears and the associated weather configuration (and maybe the region of max occurrence).
- Line 152: Could you elaborate on how the “unit valued grid points” are defined?
- Line 222: Which these factors are?
- Lines 234-236: Could you elaborate on why this happens?
Very minor comments
- Lines 18 & 21: 5 November or November 5th or the 5th of November
- Line 22: I don’t think Wikipedia is an appropriate citation. Please consider other sources.
- Lines 52-55: Please check syntax
- Line 157: n is not defined; I suppose is the number of events. And N equals ~7200?
- Lines 175-177: Check syntax
- Line 179: Which year?
- Caption Figure 2: I don’t see “negative dashed” red contours. Is this correct?
- Line 211: “most” instead of “must”
- Line 220: “towards the south west” in which season?
- Line 314: “Lions” instead of “Lion”
- Lines 471-472: This paper is published.
- Lines 494-495: This paper is published (2024)
- Line 518: Journal and pages are missing
- Line 559-560: This is a pre-print now
- Line 567: Journal and pages are missing
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-270-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alice Portal, 22 Apr 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-270', Paolo De Luca, 27 Feb 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-270/egusphere-2024-270-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alice Portal, 22 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-270', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Mar 2024
The authors examine the role of Mediterranean cyclones in the formation of compound extremes from different perspectives including the distance from the event, the dynamic features, and the type of the cyclone.
The paper is beautifully written with a comprehensive discussion of the results that is extensively supported by the literature. I consider that it should be accepted for publication, but there are some points that needs to be corrected or clarified.
Specific comments
- Section 2.1a: Please justify why a coarser temporal and spatial resolution were chosen instead of the available ones from ERA5? The higher resolution wouldn’t provide an added-value in the analysis performed?
- Section 2.1b: As also stated by the authors, negative wave biases are known especially for coastal areas. Why didn’t the authors consider using a much higher resolution dataset for the waves available by Copernicus? I’m afraid that this underestimation could largely affect the frequencies of the wave-wind compounds given that a threshold for wave (i.e., 2m) is set.
- Section 2.4 and in the rest of the text: p(e) is not absolute frequency, it’s relative.
- Unfortunately, almost all figures are difficult to read. I would suggest trying different colour palettes and patterns and/or increase the size.
- I would suggest a proof reading of the text, as there are some errors regarding syntax and, mainly, punctuation.
Minor comments
- Abstract, line 11: What are these peaks? Spatial? Please clarify.
- Abstract, line 11: The “proportion of cyclone-related compounds” over what?
- Abstract in general: I think the abstract does not capture well the content of the paper.
- Line 53: What do you mean with “objective regions”?
- Section 2.2.1: Consider adding a table that could be used as a reference for section 4.3, containing the number of the cluster, the season in which appears and the associated weather configuration (and maybe the region of max occurrence).
- Line 152: Could you elaborate on how the “unit valued grid points” are defined?
- Line 222: Which these factors are?
- Lines 234-236: Could you elaborate on why this happens?
Very minor comments
- Lines 18 & 21: 5 November or November 5th or the 5th of November
- Line 22: I don’t think Wikipedia is an appropriate citation. Please consider other sources.
- Lines 52-55: Please check syntax
- Line 157: n is not defined; I suppose is the number of events. And N equals ~7200?
- Lines 175-177: Check syntax
- Line 179: Which year?
- Caption Figure 2: I don’t see “negative dashed” red contours. Is this correct?
- Line 211: “most” instead of “must”
- Line 220: “towards the south west” in which season?
- Line 314: “Lions” instead of “Lion”
- Lines 471-472: This paper is published.
- Lines 494-495: This paper is published (2024)
- Line 518: Journal and pages are missing
- Line 559-560: This is a pre-print now
- Line 567: Journal and pages are missing
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-270-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alice Portal, 22 Apr 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
407 | 122 | 20 | 549 | 44 | 15 | 13 |
- HTML: 407
- PDF: 122
- XML: 20
- Total: 549
- Supplement: 44
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Shira Raveh-Rubin
Jennifer L. Catto
Yonatan Givon
Olivia Martius
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(6763 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(7799 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper