the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Brief Communication: Mimicking periglacial landforms and processes in an ice-rich layered permafrost system with polydispersed melamine materials: a new concept
Abstract. This paper presents results on testing polydisperse melamine material versus sand for laboratory ice-rich layered soil system under thawing conditions. We demonstrate the potential of using polydisperse melamine particles in the aim of mimicking the permafrost geomorphological degradations and landslide found in periglacial field environments. We stress that this type of particles, designed for flow and sedimentary processes in river due to their light particle density and the granulometric size they span, are as well adequate for modeling more realistic geomorphological thawing features observed in cryosphere environments such as slump blocks.
- Preprint
(49793 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(50401 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Nov 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2690', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Nov 2024
reply
This is interesting and timely work. Some comments:
1. The abstract is easy to follow overall. What does ‘mimicking’ mean, experimental evaluation or numerical simulation?
2. The limitations of laboratory experiments are not well described. Therefore, the motivation for using PPP is not clear; please revise it.
3. What are the benefits of using PPP compared to conventional sand/soil materials?
4. Figure 1 is excellent.
5. The size distribution of PPP will significantly influence the flow and sedimentary behaviour. Please explain the specific particle size selection criteria.
6. The authors mentioned potential future perspectives, such as exploring scaling relations and 3D numerical modelling. Please be more specific.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2690-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Emmanuel Léger, 10 Nov 2024
reply
Dear RC1 Thank you for your very constructive comments,
Please find our answer in the enclosed file.
Best
Emmanuel Léger
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2024
reply
Thanks to the authors' hard work, almost all my comments were revised. No further review process is needed.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2690-RC3
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2024
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Emmanuel Léger, 10 Nov 2024
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2690', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2024
reply
Thanks to the authors' hard work, almost all my comments were revised. No further review process is needed.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2690-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
133 | 58 | 11 | 202 | 17 | 1 | 4 |
- HTML: 133
- PDF: 58
- XML: 11
- Total: 202
- Supplement: 17
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1