Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2686
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2686
06 Sep 2024
 | 06 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Evaluating tropospheric nitrogen dioxide in UKCA using OMI satellite retrievals over South and East Asia

Alok K. Pandey, David S. Stevenson, Alcide Zhao, Richard J. Pope, Ryan Hossaini, Krishan Kumar, and Marytn P. Chipperfield

Abstract. We compare tropospheric column nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol (UKCA) model version 11.0 with satellite measurements from NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura satellite Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) to investigate the seasonality and trends of tropospheric NO2 over South and East Asia (S/E Asia). UKCA is the atmospheric composition component of the UK Earth System Model (UKESM). UKCA was run with nudged meteorology, producing hourly output over S/E Asia for 2005–2015. OMI averaging kernels have been applied to the model hourly data sampled at Aura’s local overpass time of 13:45±15 to allow consistent model-data comparison. Background UKCA and OMI tropospheric column NO2 typically ranges between 0–2 × 1015 molecules/cm2. Diurnal cycles and vertical profiles of the tropospheric NO2 column in UKCA show that the daily minimum tropospheric column NO2 occurs around the satellite overpass time. UKCA captures the seasonality but overestimates NO2, by a factor of ~2.5, especially during winter over Eastern China and North India, at times and locations with high aerosol loadings. Heterogeneous chemistry is represented in the version of UKCA used here as uptake of N2O5 on internally generated sulfate aerosol. However, aerosol surface area may be underestimated in polluted locations, contributing to overestimation of NO2. In addition, the model may underestimate emissions of volatile organic compounds and associated peroxy acetyl (PAN) formation, leading to insufficient long-range transport of oxidised nitrogen, also contributing to overestimation of NO2 over polluted regions and underestimation over remote regions. Quantifying and understanding discrepancies in modelled NO2 warrant further investigation as they propagate into modelling of multiple environmental issues.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Alok K. Pandey, David S. Stevenson, Alcide Zhao, Richard J. Pope, Ryan Hossaini, Krishan Kumar, and Marytn P. Chipperfield

Status: open (until 26 Oct 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Alok K. Pandey, David S. Stevenson, Alcide Zhao, Richard J. Pope, Ryan Hossaini, Krishan Kumar, and Marytn P. Chipperfield
Alok K. Pandey, David S. Stevenson, Alcide Zhao, Richard J. Pope, Ryan Hossaini, Krishan Kumar, and Marytn P. Chipperfield

Viewed

Total article views: 170 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
110 33 27 170 16 3 3
  • HTML: 110
  • PDF: 33
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 170
  • Supplement: 16
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 165 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 165 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
Nitrogen dioxide is an air pollutant largely controlled by human activity that affects ozone, methane and aerosols. Satellite instruments can quantify column NO2, and by carefully matching the time and location of measurements, enable evaluation of model simulations. NO2 over SE Asia is assessed, showing that the model captures many features of the measurements, but also important differences that suggest model deficiencies in representing several aspects of the atmospheric chemistry of NO2.