the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement report: Characterization of Aerosol Hygroscopicity over Southeast Asia during the NASA CAMP2Ex Campaign
Abstract. This study characterizes the spatial and vertical nature of aerosol hygroscopicity in Southeast Asia and relates it to aerosol composition and sources. Aerosol hygroscopicity via the light scattering hygroscopic growth factor, f(RH), is calculated from the amplification of PM5 aerosol (Dp < 5 μm) scattering measurements from < 40 % to 82 % relative humidity during the Cloud, Aerosol, and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment (CAMP2Ex) between August to October 2019 over the northwest tropical Pacific. Median f(RH) is relatively low (1.26 with lower to upper quartiles of 1.05 to 1.43) like polluted environments, due to the dominance of the mixture of organic carbon and elemental carbon. The f(RH) is lowest due to smoke from the Maritime Continent (MC) during its peak biomass burning season, coincident with high carbon monoxide concentrations (> 0.25 ppm) and pronounced levels of accumulation mode particles and organic mass fractions. The highest f(RH) values are linked to coarser particles from the West Pacific and aged biomass burning particles in the region farthest away from the MC, where f(RH) values are lower than typical polluted marine environments. Convective transport and associated cloud processing in these regions decrease and increase hygroscopicity aloft in cases with transported air masses exhibiting increased organic and sulfate mass fractions, respectively. An evaluation of a global chemical transport model (CAM-chem) for cases of vertical transport showed the underrepresentation of organics resulting in overestimated modeled aerosol hygroscopicity. These findings on aerosol hygroscopicity can help to improve aerosol representation in models and the understanding of cloud formation.
- Preprint
(2777 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(390 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 Nov 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2604', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Nov 2024
reply
Review of “Measurement Report: Characterization of Aerosol Hygroscopicity over Southeast Asia during the NASA CAMP2Ex Campaign” by Lorenzo et al.
This report details a study of the spatial distribution of aerosol hygroscopicity in Southeast Asia during NASA’s “CAMP2Ex” mission, a monsoon impacted region / period. Hygroscopicity if discussed in the context of the overall aerosol composition and likely sources, e.g. regional biomass burning. The results are then evaluated using a chemical transport model (CAM-chem) to show that, compared to the data, there is an underrepresentation of organics resulting in overestimated modeled aerosol hygroscopicity.
Overall, this is a solid “Measurement Report” with important information that should appear in a peer-reviewed publication as well as relevant scientific results. Pending minor revisions, it can be published in ACP.
Main Paper
Introduction –
- The introduction is well written with an extensive treatment of kappa. I believe this section would benefit from relevant values of kappa for the aerosol types being discussed (i.e., marine, organic, EC are mentioned and ranked comparatively, can you add and reference their kappa values? – e.g. those found in the supplement?).
- The paragraph starting at line 126 needs to be rewritten. “In the CAMP2Ex region, biomass burning aerosol hygroscopicity is over-estimated by global atmosphere models simulating the CAMP2Ex campaign…”
- Note that the superscript 2 is sometimes used and sometimes not used (please be consistent).
- The phrasing here seems to indicate the Collow et al. and Edwards et al. references have already done what this paper claims to do (next paragraph “To our knowledge, this is the first time this dataset has been explored extensively to characterize aerosol hygroscopicity properties in the region.” – please clarify what of the points i – iv has been done and what is novel about this report? Specifically, how are i and ii different from what is done in the above references?
- At line 139 the word “opportune” seems unnecessary, please remove.
Methods –
- At line 162 and elsewhere “submicron” should be “submicrometer”
- At 2.3.1 Trajectory Analysis – Can you include some detail on the trajectory results? Direct reference to Hilario is fine but some detail on how the trajectories are obtained should be contained in the paper; this is probably more a description of HYSPLIT than anything but, as this is directly impactful on this report, please make the reader aware of the method (i.e., as is done for CAM-chem).
Results and Discussion
- Throughout this section (and through the Conclusions) subjective terms such as relatively low, narrow range, etc. are used. Please rewrite this as quantities and remove subjective terminology (as an example, f(RH) being relatively low needs to be compared to something for context, better instead to simply reported the observed values).
One final statement is that this paper is on the long side and contains strange formatting. The paper would benefit from an extensive read through in an attempt to shorten; this is nothing especially troubling but, at 33 pages with 17 figures, the authors could consider if anything can be eliminated / combined (e.g. the vertical profile figures or combining case study figures)? I suspect the formatting is a result of some figure formats and will probably be corrected in final edits. None the less, there exist large gaps and occasional blank lines that should be corrected.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2604-RC1
Data sets
CAM-chem Model Outputs used in "Measurement Report: Characterization of Aerosol Hygroscopicity over Southeast Asia during the NASA CAMP2Ex Campaign" Simone Tilmes and Jun Zhang https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26755936.v2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
154 | 32 | 59 | 245 | 15 | 2 | 6 |
- HTML: 154
- PDF: 32
- XML: 59
- Total: 245
- Supplement: 15
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1