the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Constraining the timing and processes of pediment formation and dissection: implications for long-term evolution in the Western Cape, South Africa
Abstract. Pediment surfaces are a widespread feature of the southern African landscape and have long been regarded as ancient landforms. Cosmogenic nuclide data from four pediment surfaces in the Gouritz catchment, Western Cape, South Africa are reported, including boulder surface samples and a depth profile through a colluvial pediment deposit. The results indicate low surface lowering rates (0.315 to 0.954 m My−1) and minimum exposure ages of 0.678–4.462 My (assuming denudation rates of 0.3 m My−1). Duricrusts have developed in the pediments and are preserved in some locations, which represent an internal geomorphic threshold limiting denudation and indicate at least 1 My of geomorphic stability following pediment formation. The pediments and the neighbouring Cape Fold Belt are deeply dissected by small order streams that form up to 280 m deep river valleys in the resistant fold belt bedrock geology, indicating a secondary incision phase of the pediments by these smaller order streams. Using the broader stratigraphic and geomorphic framework, the minimum age of pediment formation is considered to be Miocene. Several pediment surfaces grade above the present trunk valleys of the Gouritz River, which suggests that the trunk rivers are long-lived features that acted as local base levels during pediment formation and later incised pediments to present levels. The geomorphic processes controlling the formation and evolution of the pediments varied over time; with pediments formed by hillslope diffusive processes as shown by the lack of fluvial indicators in the colluvial deposits and later development by fluvial processes with small tributaries dissecting the pediments. Integrating various strands of evidence indicates that the pediments are long-lived features. Caution should be taken when interpreting cosmogenic nuclide ages from pediment surfaces in ancient landscapes, as isotopic steady state conditions can be reached.
- Preprint
(3310 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2553', Regis BRAUCHER, 18 Oct 2024
The paper of Richardson et al. clearly presents attempts to constrain the timing and processed involved in pediment formation in South Africa.
The authors present different models of pediment formation based on literature then they show their sampling sites, and their chronology based on 10Be measurements and finally discussed their results.
I will have only some questions on the cosmogenic part.
- Top sample of depth profile is not at a different altitude than the other samples below (779 and 776 m); Is this correct? (table 1) Is the density of the top profile sample also set at 1.6 ?
- I was able to redo all calculations and agree with minimum ages and maximum denudation rates determined by the authors (see joined excel file).
- However, I disagree with their exposure ages determined with 0.3 m/My denudation rate. Based on 10Be only I am sure that ages up to 4.6My can be determined (table 3 last column). Using the integration time formula of Lal (1991) involving neutrons only I have an upper age of 1.04 My ( see excel All samples sheet
- Regarding the depth profile I suggest the authors to do some more investigations. From this depth profile, sample SA-LB-DP0 is an outlier compared to the other samples. Considering all samples I determined a “slope decrease” of 112 g/cm2 in disagreement with neutrons attenuation length ( ~160g/cm2); Removing the upper samples the “slope” is 155.6 g/cm2 in agreement with low denudation and neutrons attenuation.
- From this depth profile, minimum ages can be determined for each point as well as max denudation rates. This can show that the profile is almost at steady state state
- Then it will be nice if the authors could model their depth profile to determine denudation rate and exposure time. I reach a minimum age of 360ka with no denudation.
- Now because the deepest sample exhibits the higher maximum denudation rate (5.47 m/My based-on my calculation), this sample can be used to better estimate the exposure age of the entire profile. To do so, I have considered a denudation of 3.1 m/My for all samples (based on max denudation rate of sample SA-LB_DP30 ) and infinite time for all samples except the deepest one. An exposure time of 867ka was achieved for the deepest. This age can better reflect the true age of the profile.
- The authors suggest a denudation change in the past; This has already be evidenced with cosmo but with two nuclides ( 10Be and 16Al) ( Jolivet et al. 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107747 ; Godard et al 2021. ⟨1002/esp.5190⟩. I think that using one nuclide this is more difficult. I tried to model this with a denudation change from 0.3 m/My to 3.1m/Ma; I can reach a n age of 3My but the 30cm deep sample from the depth profile is not well modeled. Why did the authors not measure 26Al? This can be a real nice input and help to see a denudation rate change. I will not ask for that measurements for this paper but if the authors still have some remaining fractions, I encourage them to test (eventually they can contact me if help is needed).
I suggest accepting this paper with minor revisions
R Braucher
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2553', Alexandre Kounov, 28 Oct 2024
Dear Editor,
I reviewed this manuscript a few years ago. Upon reading the recent version, I have noticed some positive improvements. Therefore, I can only reiterate what I concluded about the manuscript previously.
The manuscript is well written and scientifically interesting. I think that the presented in this study data generally well support the suggested conclusions and the presented sequence of events during the evolution of the studied geomorphological features (Fig. 14). This study brings important advances in the better understanding of the Cretaceous and Cenozoic landscape evolution of South Africa. It also takes a significant step forward in challenging the paradigm of the existence of old, singular, large-scale erosional surfaces in southern Africa.
I have annotated a PDF copy of the manuscript with some minor comments.
Finally, I would recommend the publication of this manuscript after only minor corrections.
Kind regards.
Alexandre Kounov -
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2553', Janet Richardson, 28 Nov 2024
We would like to thank both reviewers for their positive reviews and very helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript. We have replied to each comment within the attached pdf, and have provided tracked changes where applicable to show how the manuscript has been updated.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
153 | 37 | 13 | 203 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 153
- PDF: 37
- XML: 13
- Total: 203
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1