Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2418
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2418
15 Aug 2024
 | 15 Aug 2024

Hillslope diffusion and channel steepness in landscape evolution models

David G. Litwin, Luca C. Malatesta, and Leonard S. Sklar

Abstract. The streampower fluvial erosion (SP) model is the basis for many analyses and simulations of landscape evolution. It assumes that the rate of river incision into bedrock depends only on flow intensity and rock erodibility, and is insensitive to sediment flux. In two dimensions, the SP model is often coupled with diffusion processes, which together describe the coupled evolution of channels and hillslopes (SPD models). While it is implicitly assumed that channels in the SPD models retain their detachment-limited character, this has not been extensively tested. Here we show that the deposition component of hillslope diffusion has a substantial effect on channel slope and relief in SPD models, and present a new method to predict the channel steepness index from model parameters. We contrast the results with those of a mixed bedrock-alluvial river model coupled with a hillslope diffusion model that both track sediment mass balance, and suggest that the combination of mass-conservative hillslope processes and non-mass-conservative fluvial erosion in SPD models leads to unrealistic scaling behavior. We demonstrate this by examining several field sites where an SPD model adequately describes the spacing of first-order valleys, and show that it is inadequate to predict channel steepness.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
David G. Litwin, Luca C. Malatesta, and Leonard S. Sklar

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2418', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Sep 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2418', Charles Shobe, 21 Sep 2024
  • AC1: 'Authors' response to reviewers', David Litwin, 28 Oct 2024
David G. Litwin, Luca C. Malatesta, and Leonard S. Sklar
David G. Litwin, Luca C. Malatesta, and Leonard S. Sklar

Viewed

Total article views: 369 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
252 104 13 369 3 4
  • HTML: 252
  • PDF: 104
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 369
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 384 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 384 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Landscape evolution models describe river and hillslope processes individually. We show that a widely used combination of these laws produces a scaling between channel steepness and hillslope sediment delivery that is predictable but not mechanistically realistic for many if not all applications of the model. We support this with and alternative model and field data where the model successfully predicts the headwater valley spacing but cannot predict the channel steepness.