the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Design Study for an Airborne N2O Lidar
Abstract. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the third most important greenhouse gas modified by human activities after carbon dioxide and methane. This study examines the feasibility of airborne differential absorption lidar to quantify N2O emissions from agriculture, fossil fuel combustion, industry and biomass burning. The mid-infrared spectral region, where suitably strong N2O absorption lines exist, challenges passive remote sensing by means of spectroscopy due to both low solar and terrestrial radiation. Lidar remote sensing is principally possible thanks to the laser as independent radiation source, but has not yet been realized due to technological challenges. Mid-infrared N2O absorption bands suitable for remote sensing are investigated. Simulations show that a spectral trough position between two strong N2O lines in the 4.5 µm band is the best option. A second option exists in the 3.9 µm band at the cost of higher laser frequency stability constraints and less measurement sensitivity. Both options fulfill the N2O measurement requirements for agricultural areal or point source emission quantification (0.5 % measurement precision, 500 m spatial resolution) with technically realizable and affordable transmitter (100 mW average laser power) and receiver (20 cm telescope) characteristics for integrated-path differential absorption lidar that measures the column concentration beneath the aircraft. While a satellite implementation is still out of reach owing to the lack of space-proof technology, the development of an airborne N2O lidar is feasible, yet would benefit from progress in infrared laser transmitter and low-noise detection technology.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1040 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1040 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2084', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Aug 2024
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2084/egusphere-2024-2084-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2084', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Aug 2024
The manuscript focuses on the specifications of an N2O lidar system suitable for agricultural emission concentrations. It is an important challenge, and the authors make a good description of a proposed system with relatively high technological readiness, though implementation is still a challenge. The general ideas and concepts seem reasonable and a good contribution to this relatively unexplored issue.
As this is a technological modeling investigation, I have relatively few comments.
Comments:
Terrestrial radiation is used throughout, but it’s unclear – I assume they mean thermal? That would be more precise.
Line 152: Is water possible, given the reflections are not diffused in the same was as terrestrial sources? If this is applicable to water (e.g., wastewater ponds, oceans) then that should be better supported.
Table 2: What are the thermal conditions assumed for this table?
Line 261: Are there safety concerns at this wavelength/power that may preclude use in agriculture?
Line 267: Please provide a citation for the modulated continuous wave approach.
Discussion: A table outlining the technological options, strengths, and weaknesses would be helpful.
Smaller comment:
Is the instrumentation described feasible to fit into an airplane that can fly that those altitudes and speeds? This is especially relevant for the instrumentation options that require active cooling.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2084-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2084/egusphere-2024-2084-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2084', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Aug 2024
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2084/egusphere-2024-2084-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2084', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Aug 2024
The manuscript focuses on the specifications of an N2O lidar system suitable for agricultural emission concentrations. It is an important challenge, and the authors make a good description of a proposed system with relatively high technological readiness, though implementation is still a challenge. The general ideas and concepts seem reasonable and a good contribution to this relatively unexplored issue.
As this is a technological modeling investigation, I have relatively few comments.
Comments:
Terrestrial radiation is used throughout, but it’s unclear – I assume they mean thermal? That would be more precise.
Line 152: Is water possible, given the reflections are not diffused in the same was as terrestrial sources? If this is applicable to water (e.g., wastewater ponds, oceans) then that should be better supported.
Table 2: What are the thermal conditions assumed for this table?
Line 261: Are there safety concerns at this wavelength/power that may preclude use in agriculture?
Line 267: Please provide a citation for the modulated continuous wave approach.
Discussion: A table outlining the technological options, strengths, and weaknesses would be helpful.
Smaller comment:
Is the instrumentation described feasible to fit into an airplane that can fly that those altitudes and speeds? This is especially relevant for the instrumentation options that require active cooling.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2084-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2084/egusphere-2024-2084-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Christoph Kiemle, 18 Sep 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
251 | 80 | 25 | 356 | 11 | 7 |
- HTML: 251
- PDF: 80
- XML: 25
- Total: 356
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Andreas Fix
Christian Fruck
Gerhard Ehret
Martin Wirth
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1040 KB) - Metadata XML