Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1448
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1448
23 May 2024
 | 23 May 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

High-resolution stratospheric volcanic SO2 injections in WACCM

Emma Axebrink, Moa K. Sporre, and Johan Friberg

Abstract. Aerosols from volcanic eruptions impact our climate by influencing the Earth’s radiative balance. The degree of their climate impact is determined by the location and injection altitude of the volcanic SO2. To investigate the importance of utilizing correct injection altitudes we ran climate simulations of the June 2009 Sarychev eruptions with three SO2 datasets, in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (WACCM6). We have compared simulations with WACCM’s default 1 km vertically resolved dataset M16 with our two 200 m vertically resolved datasets, S21-3D and S21-1D. The S21-3D is distributed over a large area (30 latitudes and 120 longitudes), whereas S21-1D releases all SO2 in one latitude and longitude grid-box, mimicking the default dataset M16.

For S21-1D and S21-3D, 95 % of the SO2 was injected into the stratosphere, whereas M16 injected only 75 % to the stratosphere. This difference is due to the different vertical distribution and resolution of SO2 in the datasets. The larger portion of SO2 injected into the stratosphere for the S21 datasets leads to more than twice as high sulfate aerosol load in the stratosphere for the S21-3D simulation compared to the M16 simulation during more than 8 months. The temporal evolution in AOD from two of our simulations, S21-3D and S21-1D, follows the observations from the space-borne lidar instrument CALIOP closely, while the AOD in the M16 simulation is substantially lower. This indicates that the injection altitude and vertical resolution of the injected volcanic SO2 substantially impact the model’s ability to correctly simulate the climate impact from volcanic eruptions.

The S21-3D dataset with the high vertical and horizontal resolution resulted in global volcanic forcing of -0.24 W/m2 during the first year after the eruptions, compared with only -0.11 W/m2 for M16. Hence, our study high-lights the importance of using high-vertically resolved SO2 data in simulations of volcanic climate impact, and calls for a re-evaluation of further volcanic eruptions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Emma Axebrink, Moa K. Sporre, and Johan Friberg

Status: open (until 04 Jul 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1448', Xue Wu, 24 May 2024 reply
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1448', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Jun 2024 reply
Emma Axebrink, Moa K. Sporre, and Johan Friberg

Data sets

Data for: High-resolution stratospheric volcanic SO2 injections in WACCM Emma Axebrink, Johan Friberg, and Moa K. Sporre https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11192344

Emma Axebrink, Moa K. Sporre, and Johan Friberg

Viewed

Total article views: 237 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
181 46 10 237 13 6 4
  • HTML: 181
  • PDF: 46
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 237
  • Supplement: 13
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 236 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We investigate the importance of using high vertical resolution (HR) SO2 data when simulating a volcanic eruptions’ impact on the stratospheric aerosol load and climate, using WACCM, and compare simulations with aerosol observations from CALIOP. Simulations with HR SO2 data match the observations well, whereas simulations with the model’s default low-resolution (LR) data underestimates the aerosol load by ~50 %. The resulting climate cooling is twice as high for the HR than the LR SO2 data.