the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Seasonal carbon fluxes from vegetation and soil in a Mediterranean non-tidal salt marsh
Abstract. Salt marshes are important ecosystems for carbon sequestration. However, while studies of atmospheric carbon exchange fluxes have been broadly performed in tidal salt marshes, they are scarce in non-tidal salt marshes. In this study we measured, throughout one year, instantaneous net CO2 exchange rates from four halophytes (Sarcocornia fruticosa, Halimione portulacoides, Elytrigia atherica and Salicornia patula), which are dominant species of their corresponding habitat (an halophilous scrub, a salt meadow and a glasswort sward) of a Mediterranean non-tidal salt marsh. Soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes from these habitats were also measured. E. atherica, a perennial herbaceous species, showed the highest photosynthetic rates during the entire year, but S. patula, an annual succulent herb, had also remarkable photosynthetic rates in summer. Interestingly, the woody fraction of the two perennial shrubs, S. fruticosa and H. portulacoides, showed CO2 uptake during most of the daily measurements. Regarding the studied habitats, the halophilous scrub and the salt meadow showed higher soil CO2 emissions than the glasswort sward, being these values, in general, higher than those reported for tidal salt marshes. Both soil absorption and emission of CH4 were detected. In particular, CH4 emissions were remarkably high, similar to those found in low-salinity marshes, and, in general, higher than those reported for salt marshes with a high water table salinity. Soil mineralization quotients of the halophilous scrub and the salt meadow were lower than those measured at the glasswort sward, suggesting a higher soil carbon sequestration potential of the first two habitats.
- Preprint
(621 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(382 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 20 Aug 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1320', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Jun 2024
reply
This is a promising study of carbon emissions and soil mineralization potential from non-tidal salt marshes which offers unique data with which to improve understanding of relationships between gas fluxes, plant physiology, and salinity. Marshes in the region are relatively understudied and the non-tidal system is also poorly known in terms of methane dynamics. The measurement of CO2 exchange from woody plant tissues reveals new insights about the capacity for carbon uptake throughout the plant body in the salt marsh species studied here.
One major finding is that the salt meadow and halophilous scrub had lower soil mineralization potential but higher soil CO2 emissions than the glasswort sward. This result seems counter-intuitive and I would like to see more discussion to potentially explain how longer term carbon could be sequestered despite the shorter term CO2 fluxes from soils. Authors meanwhile found higher CO2 uptake from woody tissues of the plants in the former two habitats. I wonder whether this might contribute to or be related to the higher carbon sequestration rates in those soils?
Another highlight from the study is that relatively large methane emissions were observed despite the salinity of the marshes. Authors partially attribute these high methane fluxes to the influence of low salinity groundwater, which is logical. However, I am concerned that the value of the methane emissions may be over-estimated due to the long duration of chamber closure (24h). Taking only 2 samples (initial and final) over this 24 period limits the precision of the methane fluxes as well. Authors should take care to interpret their emissions in relative terms (comparison between habitats) rather than drawing comparisons with literature, unless they find studies that have employed similarly long chamber deployments.
The data presentation does need to be improved. Please use different symbols or colors to distinguish the marsh habitats or plant species in all data figures. With the current version (all gray), one cannot discern these groups.
Additional detailed suggestions are attached.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
158 | 39 | 14 | 211 | 25 | 8 | 11 |
- HTML: 158
- PDF: 39
- XML: 14
- Total: 211
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1