the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Cold Climates, Complex Hydrology: Can A Land Surface Model Accurately Simulate Deep Percolation?
Abstract. Cold regions present unique challenges for land surface models simulating deep percolation or potential groundwater recharge. Previous model evaluation efforts often overlooked these regions and did not account for various sources of uncertainties influencing model performance and its evaluation. This work addresses these limitations using high-resolution integrated lysimeter measurements to assess the performance of the SVS land surface model in a cold climate. SVS showed promise in the simulation of snowmelt and rainfall-driven deep percolation events. It also simulated daily snow depth well, with a correlation coefficient (r) greater than 0.94 and a mean-bias-error (MBE) smaller than 3.0 cm for most of the simulation period. The newly implemented soil-freezing scheme reasonably simulated the near-surface soil temperature (r = 0.89) with a slight cold bias (MBE = -0.8 °C). However, the model's inability to represent frozen soil infiltration and preferential flow resulted in a significant underestimation of percolation (r: 0.35, MBE: -0.8 mm·day-1) and near-surface soil moisture during cold months (MBE: -0.058 m3 ·m-3). Those findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive model evaluation for improving deep percolation modeling in cold regions. Such improvements can lead to more informed decision-making regarding groundwater resource management in a changing climate.
- Preprint
(16157 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1277', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jun 2024
General Comments
This study investigates the ability of the SVS land surface model to estimate surface (snow depths) and subsurface (soil moisture and temperature, deep percolation) conditions over a multi-year period in a cold climate. SVS simulations are compared against large-scale lysimeter data from Quebec, Canada, and although the study doesn’t conclusively answer the title’s question, the results are intriguing and useful. The preprint is generally well-written and clear. Presented results highlight the limitations of soil physics representations within current land surface models, particularly the lack of preferential flow that is prevalent in most settings and important for both unfrozen and frozen ground conditions. Improving our ability to predict water partitioning under frozen ground conditions is a very important subject, since it controls both surface and subsurface water cycle components, so I also appreciate the authors tackling this critical problem. There are several minor comments, questions, and issues that I have incorporated directly into an annotated copy of the manuscript (see uploaded annotated PDF). Once these comments have been addressed, I think the study would be deserving of publication.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alireza Amani, 14 Aug 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1277', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Jun 2024
Dear authors,
Please find my comments in the attached document.- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alireza Amani, 14 Aug 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
371 | 113 | 25 | 509 | 16 | 16 |
- HTML: 371
- PDF: 113
- XML: 25
- Total: 509
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1