the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The effect of different Climate and Air Quality policies in China on in situ Ozone production in Beijing
Abstract. In recent years, clean air policies have led to reductions in air pollution across China. Alongside this, emerging carbon neutrality (CN) policies that aim to address the impacts of climate change may also deliver air quality (AQ) co-benefits or climate penalties. Different CN policies will lead to different changes in volatile organic compound (VOC), NOx, and particulate matter (PM) emissions, which will in-turn impact the photochemical production of secondary pollutants such as ozone (O3). It is currently unclear how different combinations of AQ and CN policies may impact in situ O3 production across China in the future. A detailed chemical box model incorporating the Master Chemical Mechanism was developed to investigate the impact of combined AQ and CN policies on O3 formation in Beijing. The Multi-resolution Emission Inventory model for Climate and air pollution research (MEIC) and the Dynamic Projection model for Emissions in China (DPEC) were used to estimate future pollutant mixing ratios, relative to ambient observations of 35 VOCs, NOx, CO and aerosol surface area (ASA) during the APHH-Beijing 2017 summer campaign. The most ambitious policy scenario, “Ambitious Pollution 1.5D goals", led to the largest reduction in O3 production by 2060, but was not the most impactful scenario for reducing O3 production between 2030–2045. Larger reductions were observed under the “Ambitious Pollution Neutral goals” policy which focuses on achieving net zero by 2060. O3 production was found to be most sensitive to changes in the OLE2 group of VOCs (alkenes where kOH > 7 x 104 ppm-1 min-1; a 5 % increase in OLE2 increased simulated O3 production by 1.12 %). However, reducing less reactive but higher concentration species in Beijing (including methanol and short-chain alkanes) led to larger reductions in O3 production under all scenarios. O3 production was not sensitive to changes in ASA, with a 69 % decrease in ASA leading to a change of < 1 % in O3. However, doubling biogenic VOCs in the model further increased O3 production in 2060 under all future scenarios by up to 18 %, indicating that the influence of future climate-induced changes in biogenic emissions may have a significant impact on in situ O3 formation in Beijing. This study highlights that the emission trajectories of certain specific VOCs are highly influential in determining possible future O3 air quality effects that may arise from increasing ambient temperatures and decarbonisation in Beijing.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1461 KB)
-
Supplement
(30 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1461 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(30 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2910', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Mar 2024
This article describes a detailed chemical box model incorporating the Master Chemical Mechanism to investigate the impact of combined air quality and carbon neutrality policies on O3 formation in Beijing. The results showed that O3 production was most sensitive to changes in the OLE2 group of VOCs, while reducing less reactive but higher concentration species led to larger reductions in O3 production under all scenarios. In general, the idea of the article is clear and the text is smooth. Some details need to be strengthened to meet the publication requirements. Specific comments are as follows:
- Line 38-46: The introduction of O3 are lengthy and need to be reduced to core point.
- When the sentence is connected to the reference, multiple sentence positions are misplaced, such as 'and lead to malnourished populations. (Ainsworth, 2017; IPCC, 2015; Mills et al., 2018)' should be corrected to 'and lead to malnourished populations (Ainsworth, 2017; IPCC, 2015; Mills et al., 2018).'. Please revise throughout the manuscript.
- Line 64-65: 'be' on ' to be account for ' should be removed.
- Line 87-94: The box model proposed to evaluate the effect of different Climate on O3 production is suggested to compare with other models.
- Line 149-150: There is a lack of complete bracket.
- Line 204-220: How to deal with meteorological parameters when adjusting the observational dataset of pollutants in the model.
- Line 379-382: The points in 'Methanol emissions are projected to increase compared to 2017 levels under the Ambitious Pollution 1.5D goals until 2040' and 'the observed increase in methanol of ca. 25% up to 2040 could have a more pronounced impact on increasing O3 production than smaller incremental changes in more reactive species such as OLE2' is inconsistent with the varies of MEOH group from Figure 3.
- Figure S1 and Figure 5 can not be found from this manuscript.
- The point that aerosols have a minimal effect on O3 production was mentioned in previous studies, such as Tan et al. (2020, 2022). The conclusions here should be compared with other studies.
- Line 437: O3 subscript writing is wrong.
- Line 466-469: The conclusion of 'Between 2030–2045, the most ambitious scenario, Ambitious Pollution 1.5D goals, did not lead to the largest reductions in O3 production rate. This can be attributed reductions in less reactive species that are present in large amounts in Beijing, such as methanol and the smaller chain alkanes (ALK1 and ALK2)' is right? Please check the conclusion with Line 383-387.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2910-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Beth Nelson, 30 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2910/egusphere-2023-2910-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2910', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Mar 2024
The article titled "The effect of different Climate and Air Quality policies in China on in situ Ozone production in Beijing" by Beth S. Nelson et al. explores how different air quality (AQ) and carbon neutrality (CN) policies in China affect the production of ozone (O3) in Beijing. It delves into the complex relationship between emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter, and the photochemical production of ozone.
In general, this article is well-motivated and written. The intention to evaluate the various emission change scenarios in air quality perspective is prudent. The change in emission is discussed fairly thoroughly in the discussion. However, the change in oxidation capacity and climatology are not factored in the analysis. For example, it is expected a smaller HONO production in the future particularly from heterogeneous reaction sources. In addition, higher temperature and extreme weather are expected due to climate change. I would recommend adding more quantitative discussion from these factors.Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2910-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Beth Nelson, 30 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2910/egusphere-2023-2910-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Beth Nelson, 30 May 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2910', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Mar 2024
This article describes a detailed chemical box model incorporating the Master Chemical Mechanism to investigate the impact of combined air quality and carbon neutrality policies on O3 formation in Beijing. The results showed that O3 production was most sensitive to changes in the OLE2 group of VOCs, while reducing less reactive but higher concentration species led to larger reductions in O3 production under all scenarios. In general, the idea of the article is clear and the text is smooth. Some details need to be strengthened to meet the publication requirements. Specific comments are as follows:
- Line 38-46: The introduction of O3 are lengthy and need to be reduced to core point.
- When the sentence is connected to the reference, multiple sentence positions are misplaced, such as 'and lead to malnourished populations. (Ainsworth, 2017; IPCC, 2015; Mills et al., 2018)' should be corrected to 'and lead to malnourished populations (Ainsworth, 2017; IPCC, 2015; Mills et al., 2018).'. Please revise throughout the manuscript.
- Line 64-65: 'be' on ' to be account for ' should be removed.
- Line 87-94: The box model proposed to evaluate the effect of different Climate on O3 production is suggested to compare with other models.
- Line 149-150: There is a lack of complete bracket.
- Line 204-220: How to deal with meteorological parameters when adjusting the observational dataset of pollutants in the model.
- Line 379-382: The points in 'Methanol emissions are projected to increase compared to 2017 levels under the Ambitious Pollution 1.5D goals until 2040' and 'the observed increase in methanol of ca. 25% up to 2040 could have a more pronounced impact on increasing O3 production than smaller incremental changes in more reactive species such as OLE2' is inconsistent with the varies of MEOH group from Figure 3.
- Figure S1 and Figure 5 can not be found from this manuscript.
- The point that aerosols have a minimal effect on O3 production was mentioned in previous studies, such as Tan et al. (2020, 2022). The conclusions here should be compared with other studies.
- Line 437: O3 subscript writing is wrong.
- Line 466-469: The conclusion of 'Between 2030–2045, the most ambitious scenario, Ambitious Pollution 1.5D goals, did not lead to the largest reductions in O3 production rate. This can be attributed reductions in less reactive species that are present in large amounts in Beijing, such as methanol and the smaller chain alkanes (ALK1 and ALK2)' is right? Please check the conclusion with Line 383-387.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2910-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Beth Nelson, 30 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2910/egusphere-2023-2910-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2910', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Mar 2024
The article titled "The effect of different Climate and Air Quality policies in China on in situ Ozone production in Beijing" by Beth S. Nelson et al. explores how different air quality (AQ) and carbon neutrality (CN) policies in China affect the production of ozone (O3) in Beijing. It delves into the complex relationship between emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter, and the photochemical production of ozone.
In general, this article is well-motivated and written. The intention to evaluate the various emission change scenarios in air quality perspective is prudent. The change in emission is discussed fairly thoroughly in the discussion. However, the change in oxidation capacity and climatology are not factored in the analysis. For example, it is expected a smaller HONO production in the future particularly from heterogeneous reaction sources. In addition, higher temperature and extreme weather are expected due to climate change. I would recommend adding more quantitative discussion from these factors.Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2910-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Beth Nelson, 30 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2910/egusphere-2023-2910-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Beth Nelson, 30 May 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
446 | 103 | 23 | 572 | 38 | 14 | 16 |
- HTML: 446
- PDF: 103
- XML: 23
- Total: 572
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Zhenze Liu
Freya A. Squires
Marvin Shaw
James R. Hopkins
Jacqueline F. Hamilton
Andrew R. Rickard
Alastair C. Lewis
Zongbo Shi
James D. Lee
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1461 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(30 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper