Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-892
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-892
01 Jun 2023
 | 01 Jun 2023

Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer and vertical ozone profiles during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas

Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd

Abstract. The Tracking Aerosol Convection Experiment Air Quality (TRACER-AQ) campaign probed Houston air quality with a comprehensive suite of ground-based and airborne remote sensing measurements during the intensive operating period in September 2021. Two post-frontal high-ozone episodes (September 6–11 and 23–26) were recorded during the said period. In this study, we evaluated the simulation of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height and the vertical ozone profile by a high-resolution (1.33 km) 3-D photochemical model, Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)-driven GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC). We contrasted the model performance between ozone-episode days and non-episode days. The model captures the diurnal variations of the PBL during ozone episodes (R = 0.72–0.77; normal mean bias (NMB) = 3 %–22 %) and non-episode days (R = 0.88; NMB = -21 %), compared with the ceilometer at La Porte. Land-water differences in PBL heights are captured better during non-episode days than episode days, compared with the airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar-2 (HSRL-2). During ozone episodes, the simulated land-water differences are 50–60 m (morning), 320–520 m (noon), and 440–560 m (afternoon) in comparison with the observed values of 190 m, 130 m, and 260 m, respectively. During non-episode days, the simulated land-water differences are 140–220 m (morning) and 360–760 m (noon) in comparison with the observed values of 210 m and 420 m, respectively. For vertical ozone distributions, the model was evaluated against vertical profile measurements from the Tropospheric Ozone lidar (TROPOZ), the HSRL-2, and ozonesondes, as well as at the surface from a model 49i ozone analyzer and a site from the Continuous Ambient Monitoring Stations (CAMS) at La Porte. The model underestimates free tropospheric ozone (2–3 km aloft) by 9 %–22 % but overestimates near-ground ozone (< 50 m aloft) by 6 %–39 % during the two ozone episodes. Boundary layer ozone (0.5–1 km aloft) is underestimated by 1 %–11 % during September 8–11 but overestimated by 0 %–7 % during September 23–26. Based on these evaluations, we identified two model limitations: the single-layer PBL representation and free tropospheric ozone underestimation. These limitations have implications for the predictivity of ozone’s vertical mixing and distribution in other models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

29 Sep 2023
Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer height and vertical ozone profile during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas
Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5493–5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5493-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5493-2023, 2023
Short summary
Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-892', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jul 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-892', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jul 2023
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-892', Xueying Liu, 16 Aug 2023

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-892', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jul 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-892', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jul 2023
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-892', Xueying Liu, 16 Aug 2023

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Xueying Liu on behalf of the Authors (16 Aug 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (30 Aug 2023) by Leena Järvi
AR by Xueying Liu on behalf of the Authors (31 Aug 2023)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

29 Sep 2023
Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer height and vertical ozone profile during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas
Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5493–5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5493-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5493-2023, 2023
Short summary
Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd

Data sets

Data for 'Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer and vertical ozone profiles during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas' Xueying Liu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7983449

Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd

Viewed

Total article views: 423 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
307 101 15 423 36 5 5
  • HTML: 307
  • PDF: 101
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 423
  • Supplement: 36
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 415 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 415 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 03 Sep 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
With a comprehensive suite of ground-based and airborne remote sensing measurements during the 2021 Tracking Aerosol Convection Experiment Air Quality (TRACER-AQ) campaign in Houston, this study evaluates the simulation of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height and the ozone vertical profile by a high-resolution (1.33 km) 3-D photochemical model Weather Research and Forecasting-driven GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC).