the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Chemical Composition-Dependent Hygroscopic Behavior of Individual Ambient Aerosol Particles Collected at a Coastal Site
Abstract. This study investigated the hygroscopic behavior of individual ambient aerosol particles collected at a coastal site of Jeju Island, Korea. The particles' size change along with phase transitions during humidification and dehydration processes, and their chemical compositions, were determined by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), respectively. Of the 39 particles analyzed, 24 were aged sea-spray aerosols (SSAs) with diverse mixing ratios of Cl- and NO3-.
The ambient SSAs exhibited multiple deliquescence and efflorescence transitions that were dominantly influenced by NaCl, NaNO3, MgCl2, Mg(NO3)2 and organic species covering the surface of the aged SSAs. For Cl-rich SSAs with X(Na, Mg)Cl > 0.4, although some particles showed very slow water uptake at low RHs = ~30 %, two major transitions were observed during the humidification process, firstly at RH = ~63.8 %, regardless of their chemical compositions, which is the mutual deliquescence relative humidity (MDRH), and secondly at RH = 67.5–73.5 %, depending on their chemical compositions, which are the final DRHs. During the dehydration process, the Cl-rich SSAs showed single-stage efflorescence at RH = 33.0–50.5 %, due to simultaneous heterogeneous crystallization of inorganic salts. For Cl-depleted SSAs with X(Na, Mg)Cl < 0.4, two prompt deliquescence transitions were observed during the humidification process, firstly at MDRH = 63.8 % and secondly at RH = 65.4–72.9 %. The mutual deliquescence transition was more distinguishable for Cl-depleted SSAs. During the dehydration process, step-wise transitions were observed at efflorescence RHs (ERHs) = 24.6–46.0 % and 17.9–30.5 %, depending on their chemical compositions.
Additionally, aged mineral particles showed partial or complete phase changes with varying RH due to the presence of SSAs and/or NO3- species. In contrast, non-reacted mineral and Fe-rich particles maintained their size during the entire hygroscopic process. The mixture particles of organic and ammonium sulfate (AS) exhibited lower deliquescence and efflorescence RHs compared to pure AS salt, highlighting the impact of organic species on the hygroscopic behavior of AS. These findings emphasize the complexity of atmospheric aerosols and the importance of considering their composition and mixing state when modeling their hygroscopic behavior and subsequent atmospheric impacts.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(4740 KB)
-
Supplement
(4742 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4740 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4742 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-693', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-693/egusphere-2023-693-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chul-Un Ro, 24 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-693/egusphere-2023-693-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chul-Un Ro, 24 Jun 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-693', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Jul 2023
The paper investigated the hygroscopicity of atmospheric aerosols collected on Jeju Island, Korea. Both optical microscopy and SEM-EDS were used for the analyses. The paper improves our understanding in hygroscopicity of complex ambient SSA aerosols. The paper is within the scope of ACP and well organized. The figures are present in a proper way. Overall, I suggest accepting this paper after the revision.
Here are my comments:
- I found that the paper was based on 39 particles collected in one sample. How could we ensure the representative of this sample?
- Line 95, an unnecessary parenthesis appeared in the sentence.
- Figure 2, all the SSAs are classified as “aged SSA”. Did the authors find any nascent SSA in their study?
- Figures 6&7, the caption is too simple. At least the notations of five phases should be explained in the caption.
- Section 3.4, although nonSSA particles is not the main component in this paper, pure description without figure is not convenient for reading. It would be better if the authors could move one representative figure from SI into the text in this section.
- The scale bar in Figure S2 was missing too.
- It is necessary to present SEM images of laboratory-generated (Na, Mg)(Cl, NO3) mixture particles, maybe in Figure S3.
- Figures S6-S12, what did the size in SEM image stand for? Scale bar or diameter?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-693-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Chul-Un Ro, 20 Jul 2023
We thank the reviewer very much for the positive evaluation and valuable suggestions for our work.
Except comments #1 and #3, all the other comments suggesting the modifications in the text and figures will be respected in the final revision.
* Comment #1: I found that the paper was based on 39 particles collected in one sample. How could we ensure the representative of this sample?
- Resopnse: Our main focus is not the characterization of the sample. Instead, we deeply investigated the hygroscopic behavior of ambient aerosols collected at a coastal site in terms of their chemical compositions.
* Comment #3: Figure 2, all the SSAs are classified as “aged SSA”. Did the authors find any nascent SSA in their study?
- Response: Indeed, all the SSAs are more or less aged. We will make this clear in the text of the final revision.
The final revision will be made later based on all reviewers’ comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-693-AC2
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-693', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-693/egusphere-2023-693-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chul-Un Ro, 24 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-693/egusphere-2023-693-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Chul-Un Ro, 24 Jun 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-693', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Jul 2023
The paper investigated the hygroscopicity of atmospheric aerosols collected on Jeju Island, Korea. Both optical microscopy and SEM-EDS were used for the analyses. The paper improves our understanding in hygroscopicity of complex ambient SSA aerosols. The paper is within the scope of ACP and well organized. The figures are present in a proper way. Overall, I suggest accepting this paper after the revision.
Here are my comments:
- I found that the paper was based on 39 particles collected in one sample. How could we ensure the representative of this sample?
- Line 95, an unnecessary parenthesis appeared in the sentence.
- Figure 2, all the SSAs are classified as “aged SSA”. Did the authors find any nascent SSA in their study?
- Figures 6&7, the caption is too simple. At least the notations of five phases should be explained in the caption.
- Section 3.4, although nonSSA particles is not the main component in this paper, pure description without figure is not convenient for reading. It would be better if the authors could move one representative figure from SI into the text in this section.
- The scale bar in Figure S2 was missing too.
- It is necessary to present SEM images of laboratory-generated (Na, Mg)(Cl, NO3) mixture particles, maybe in Figure S3.
- Figures S6-S12, what did the size in SEM image stand for? Scale bar or diameter?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-693-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Chul-Un Ro, 20 Jul 2023
We thank the reviewer very much for the positive evaluation and valuable suggestions for our work.
Except comments #1 and #3, all the other comments suggesting the modifications in the text and figures will be respected in the final revision.
* Comment #1: I found that the paper was based on 39 particles collected in one sample. How could we ensure the representative of this sample?
- Resopnse: Our main focus is not the characterization of the sample. Instead, we deeply investigated the hygroscopic behavior of ambient aerosols collected at a coastal site in terms of their chemical compositions.
* Comment #3: Figure 2, all the SSAs are classified as “aged SSA”. Did the authors find any nascent SSA in their study?
- Response: Indeed, all the SSAs are more or less aged. We will make this clear in the text of the final revision.
The final revision will be made later based on all reviewers’ comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-693-AC2
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
340 | 109 | 20 | 469 | 39 | 8 | 7 |
- HTML: 340
- PDF: 109
- XML: 20
- Total: 469
- Supplement: 39
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Hyo-Jin Eom
Hanjin Yoo
Dhrubajyoti Gupta
Hye-Rin Cho
Pingqing Fu
Chul-Un Ro
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4740 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4742 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper