the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical Note: TimeFRAME – A Bayesian Mixing Model to Unravel Isotopic Data and Quantify Trace Gas Production and Consumption Pathways for Timeseries Data
Abstract. Isotopic measurements of trace gases such as N2O, CO2 and CH4 contain valuable information about production and consumption pathways. Quantification of the underlying pathways contributing to variability in isotopic timeseries can provide answers to key scientific questions, such as the contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions under different environmental conditions, or the drivers of multiyear variability in atmospheric CH4 growth rate. However, there is currently no data analysis package available to solve isotopic production, mixing and consumption problems for timeseries data in a unified manner while accounting for uncertainty in measurements and model parameters. Bayesian hierarchical models combine the use of expert information with measured data and a mathematical mixing model while considering and updating the uncertainties involved, and are an ideal basis to approach this problem.
Here we present the TimeFRAME data analysis package for "Time-resolved Fractionation And Mixing Evaluation". We use four different classes of Bayesian hierarchical model to solve production, mixing and consumption contributions using multi-isotope timeseries measurements: i) independent time step models, ii) Gaussian process priors on measurements, iii) Dirichlet-Gaussian process priors, and iv) generalized linear models with spline bases. All four models have been extensively tested in different variations and for a multitude of scenarios. Dirichlet-Gaussian process prior models have been found to be most reliable, allowing for simultaneous estimation of hyperparameters via Bayesian hierarchical modeling. Generalized linear models with spline bases seem promising as well, especially for fractionation estimation, although the robustness to real datasets is difficult to assess given their high flexibility. Experiments with simulated data for δ15Nbulk and δ15NSP of N2O showed that model performance across all classes could be greatly improved by reducing uncertainty in model input data – particularly isotopic endmembers and fractionation factors. The addition of the δ18O additional isotopic dimension yielded a comparatively small benefit for N2O production pathways but improved quantification of the fraction of N2O consumed.
The TimeFRAME package can be used to evaluate both static and timeseries datasets, with flexible choice of the number and type of isotopic endmembers and the model set up allowing simple implementation for different trace gases. The package is available in R, and is implemented using Stan for parameter estimation, in addition to supplementary functions re-implementing some of the surveyed isotope analysis techniques.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(16701 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(16701 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2836', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2836/egusphere-2023-2836-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Eliza Harris, 05 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2836', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Mar 2024
TimeFRAME is an R-package that estimates process rates based on isotopic measurements using Bayesian modelling. The more complex methods implemented in the package consider temporal correlations between sampling times, which gives the methods an edge over the FRAME package, where each datapoint is considered independently. While TimeFRAME was developed mainly to analyse N2O isotopic data, it can also be used for analysis of other isotopic datasets.
There is substantial testing of the methods in the manuscript, with respect to uncertainty in input parameters, and model complexity. Comparison with other approaches is also done. This gives credibility to the functions implemented, in the sense that they may be used for analysis of similar datasets. Also, there is ample discussion of caution that should be exerted in model choice and configurations, so users will find much guidance in the technical note.
My only remark is that the methods are purely statistical approaches. Timeseries data can also be tackled with dynamic, mechanistic approaches (based on differential equations), which typically have few parameters to be fitted and can ingest more diverse data sets, i.e. including concentrations. While I am not claiming that the authors should also discuss those methods at length, it would be desirable that they at least mention this -alternative- approach to stable isotopic data analysis for timeseries data.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2836-RC2 - AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Eliza Harris, 05 Apr 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2836', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2836/egusphere-2023-2836-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Eliza Harris, 05 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2836', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Mar 2024
TimeFRAME is an R-package that estimates process rates based on isotopic measurements using Bayesian modelling. The more complex methods implemented in the package consider temporal correlations between sampling times, which gives the methods an edge over the FRAME package, where each datapoint is considered independently. While TimeFRAME was developed mainly to analyse N2O isotopic data, it can also be used for analysis of other isotopic datasets.
There is substantial testing of the methods in the manuscript, with respect to uncertainty in input parameters, and model complexity. Comparison with other approaches is also done. This gives credibility to the functions implemented, in the sense that they may be used for analysis of similar datasets. Also, there is ample discussion of caution that should be exerted in model choice and configurations, so users will find much guidance in the technical note.
My only remark is that the methods are purely statistical approaches. Timeseries data can also be tackled with dynamic, mechanistic approaches (based on differential equations), which typically have few parameters to be fitted and can ingest more diverse data sets, i.e. including concentrations. While I am not claiming that the authors should also discuss those methods at length, it would be desirable that they at least mention this -alternative- approach to stable isotopic data analysis for timeseries data.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2836-RC2 - AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Eliza Harris, 05 Apr 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
243 | 109 | 32 | 384 | 25 | 22 |
- HTML: 243
- PDF: 109
- XML: 32
- Total: 384
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Eliza Jean Harris
Philipp Fischer
Maciej P. Lewicki
Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak
Stephen J. Harris
Fernando Perez-Cruz
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(16701 KB) - Metadata XML