Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2711
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2711
29 Nov 2023
 | 29 Nov 2023
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

The impacts of modelling prescribed vs. dynamic land cover in a high CO2 future scenario – greening of the Arctic and Amazonian dieback

Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek Arora, Christian Seiler, and Libo Wang

Abstract. Terrestrial biosphere models are a key tool in investigating the role played by the land surface in the global climate system. However, few models simulate the geographic distribution of biomes dynamically, opting to prescribe them instead using remote sensing products. While prescribing land cover still allows for the simulation of the impacts of climate change on vegetation growth as well as the impacts of land use change, it prevents the simulation of climate change-driven biome shifts, with implications for projecting the future terrestrial carbon sink. Here, we isolate the impacts of prescribed vs. dynamic land cover implementations in a terrestrial biosphere model. We first introduce a framework for evaluating dynamic land cover (i.e., the spatial distribution of plant functional types across the land surface), which can be applied across terrestrial biosphere models alongside standard benchmarking of energy, water, and carbon cycle variables. After establishing confidence in simulated land cover, we then show that the simulated terrestrial carbon sink differs significantly between simulations with dynamic vs. prescribed land cover for a high CO2 future scenario. This is because of important range shifts that are only simulated when dynamic land cover is implemented: tree expansion into the Arctic and Amazonian transition from forest to grassland. In particular, the projected net land-atmosphere CO2 flux at the end of the 21st century is twice as large in simulations with dynamic land cover than in simulations with prescribed land cover. Our results illustrate the importance of climate change-driven biome shifts for projecting the future terrestrial carbon sink.

Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek Arora, Christian Seiler, and Libo Wang

Status: open (until 28 Mar 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2711', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Feb 2024 reply
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, 06 Feb 2024 reply
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek Arora, Christian Seiler, and Libo Wang
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek Arora, Christian Seiler, and Libo Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 137 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
90 34 13 137 12 12
  • HTML: 90
  • PDF: 34
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 137
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 138 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 138 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
Terrestrial biosphere models can either prescribe the geographical distribution of biomes or simulate them dynamically, capturing climate change-driven biome shifts. We isolate and examine the differences between these different land cover implementations. We find that the simulated terrestrial carbon sink at the end of the 21st century is twice as large in simulations with dynamic land cover than in simulations with prescribed land cover due to important range shifts in the Arctic and Amazon.