Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2627
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2627
01 Dec 2023
 | 01 Dec 2023

Factors controlling spatiotemporal variability of soil carbon accumulation and stock estimates in a tidal salt marsh

Sean Fettrow, Andrew Wozniak, Holly Michael, and Angelia Seyfferth

Abstract. Tidal salt marshes are important contributors to soil carbon (C) stocks despite their relatively small land surface area. Although it is well understood that salt marshes have soil C burial rates orders of magnitude greater than those of terrestrial ecosystems, there is a wide range in storage rates among spatially distributed marshes. In addition, wide ranges in C storage rates also exist within a single marsh ecosystem. Tidal marshes often contain multiple species of cordgrass due to variations in hydrology and soil biogeochemistry caused by microtopography and distance from tidal creeks, creating distinct subsites. Our overarching objective was to observe how soil C concentration changes across four plant phenophases and across three subsites categorized by unique vegetation, hydrology, and biogeochemistry, while also investigating dominant biogeochemical controls on soil C concentration. We hypothesized that subsite biogeochemistry drives spatial heterogeneity in soil C concentration, and this causes variability in soil C concentration at the marsh scale. In addition, we hypothesized that soil C concentration and porewater biogeochemistry vary temporally across the four plant phenophases (i.e., senescence, dormancy, green-up, maturity), causing further variation in marsh soil C that could lead to uncertainty in soil C estimates. To test these hypotheses, we quantified soil C concentrations in 12 cm sections of soil cores (0–48 cm depth) across time (i.e., phenophase) and space (i.e., subsite), alongside several porewater biogeochemical variables including dissolved organic carbon (DOC), EEMs/ UV-VIS, redox potential, pH, salinity, reduced iron (Fe2+), reduced sulfur (S2-), and total porewater element (Fe, Ca) concentrations in three distinct subsites. Soil C concentration varied significantly (p<0.05) among the three subsites and was significantly greater during plant dormancy. Soil S, porewater sulfide, redox potential, and depth predicted 44 % of the variability in soil C concentration. Our results show that soil C varied spatially across a marsh ecosystem up to 63 % and across plant phenophase by 26 %, causing variability in soil C storage rates and stocks depending on where and when samples are taken. This shows that hydrology, biogeochemistry, and ecological function are major controls on saltmarsh C content. It is, therefore, critical to consider spatial and temporal heterogeneity in soil C concentration when conducting blue C assessments to account for soil carbon variability and uncertainty in C stock estimates.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

16 May 2024
Factors controlling spatiotemporal variability of soil carbon accumulation and stock estimates in a tidal salt marsh
Sean Fettrow, Andrew Wozniak, Holly A. Michael, and Angelia L. Seyfferth
Biogeosciences, 21, 2367–2384, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2367-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sean Fettrow, Andrew Wozniak, Holly Michael, and Angelia Seyfferth

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2627', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Jan 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Angelia Seyfferth, 27 Feb 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2627', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Feb 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Angelia Seyfferth, 27 Feb 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2627', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Jan 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Angelia Seyfferth, 27 Feb 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2627', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Feb 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Angelia Seyfferth, 27 Feb 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (01 Mar 2024) by Sebastian Naeher
AR by Angelia Seyfferth on behalf of the Authors (25 Mar 2024)  Author's response   Manuscript 
EF by Sarah Buchmann (26 Mar 2024)  Author's tracked changes 
ED: Publish as is (26 Mar 2024) by Sebastian Naeher
AR by Angelia Seyfferth on behalf of the Authors (04 Apr 2024)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

16 May 2024
Factors controlling spatiotemporal variability of soil carbon accumulation and stock estimates in a tidal salt marsh
Sean Fettrow, Andrew Wozniak, Holly A. Michael, and Angelia L. Seyfferth
Biogeosciences, 21, 2367–2384, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2367-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sean Fettrow, Andrew Wozniak, Holly Michael, and Angelia Seyfferth
Sean Fettrow, Andrew Wozniak, Holly Michael, and Angelia Seyfferth

Viewed

Total article views: 278 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
177 81 20 278 24 14 14
  • HTML: 177
  • PDF: 81
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 278
  • Supplement: 24
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 278 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 278 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 May 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Salt marshes play a large role in global C storage, and C stock estimates are used to predict future changes. However, spatial and temporal gradients in C burial rates across the landscape exist due to variations in water inundation, dominant plant species and stage of growth, and tidal action. We quantified soil C concentrations in soil cores across time and space alongside several porewater biogeochemical variables and discussed the controls on variability in soil C in salt marsh ecosystems.