Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2496
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2496
07 Nov 2023
 | 07 Nov 2023

The Temporal Phasing of Rapid Dansgaard–Oeschger Warming Events Cannot Be Reliably Determined

John Slattery, Louise C. Sime, Francesco Muschitiello, and Keno Riechers

Abstract. Dansgaard–Oeschger (DO) warming events occurred throughout the last glacial period. Greenland ice cores show a rapid warming during each stadial to interstadial transition, alongside abrupt loss of sea ice and major reorganisation of the atmospheric circulation. Other records also indicate simultaneous abrupt changes to the oceanic circulation. Recently, an advanced Bayesian ramp fitting method has been developed and used to investigate time lags between transitions in these different climate elements, with a view to determining the relative order of these changes. Here, we subject this method to a critical review. Using ice core data, climate model output, and carefully synthesised data representing DO warming events, we demonstrate that the method suffers from noise-induced bias of up to 15 years. This bias means that the method will tend to yield transition onsets that are too early, and we find that the estimated timings of noisier transitions are more strongly biased. Further investigation of DO warming event records in climate models and ice core data reveals that the bias is on the same order of magnitude as potential timing differences between the abrupt transitions of different climate elements. Additionally, we find that higher-resolution records would not reduce this bias. We conclude that time lags of less than 20 years cannot be reliably detected, as we cannot exclude the possibility that they result solely from the bias. This prevents the unambiguous determination of the temporal phasing of DO warming events.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

05 Nov 2024
Estimating biases during detection of leads and lags between climate elements across Dansgaard–Oeschger events
John Slattery, Louise C. Sime, Francesco Muschitiello, and Keno Riechers
Clim. Past, 20, 2431–2454, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-2431-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-2431-2024, 2024
Short summary
John Slattery, Louise C. Sime, Francesco Muschitiello, and Keno Riechers

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Mathieu Casado, 21 Dec 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', John Slattery, 14 Mar 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Sune O. Rasmussen, 10 Jan 2024
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', John Slattery, 14 Mar 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Anonymous Referee #3, 12 Feb 2024
    • AC4: 'Reply on RC3', John Slattery, 14 Mar 2024
  • EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Emilie Capron, 13 Feb 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on EC1', John Slattery, 15 Feb 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Mathieu Casado, 21 Dec 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', John Slattery, 14 Mar 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Sune O. Rasmussen, 10 Jan 2024
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', John Slattery, 14 Mar 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Anonymous Referee #3, 12 Feb 2024
    • AC4: 'Reply on RC3', John Slattery, 14 Mar 2024
  • EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2496', Emilie Capron, 13 Feb 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on EC1', John Slattery, 15 Feb 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (29 Mar 2024) by Emilie Capron
AR by John Slattery on behalf of the Authors (10 May 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (27 May 2024) by Emilie Capron
RR by Sune O. Rasmussen (19 Jun 2024)
RR by Mathieu Casado (16 Jul 2024)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (30 Jul 2024) by Emilie Capron
AR by John Slattery on behalf of the Authors (07 Aug 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (02 Sep 2024) by Emilie Capron
AR by John Slattery on behalf of the Authors (06 Sep 2024)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

05 Nov 2024
Estimating biases during detection of leads and lags between climate elements across Dansgaard–Oeschger events
John Slattery, Louise C. Sime, Francesco Muschitiello, and Keno Riechers
Clim. Past, 20, 2431–2454, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-2431-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-2431-2024, 2024
Short summary
John Slattery, Louise C. Sime, Francesco Muschitiello, and Keno Riechers

Model code and software

DO_Temporal_Phasing John Slattery https://github.com/johatt11/DO_Temporal_Phasing

John Slattery, Louise C. Sime, Francesco Muschitiello, and Keno Riechers

Viewed

Total article views: 954 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
716 192 46 954 27 29
  • HTML: 716
  • PDF: 192
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 954
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 939 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 939 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Nov 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Dansgaard–Oeschger events are a series of past abrupt climate change events, during which the atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean in the North Atlantic underwent rapid changes. One current topic of interest is the order in which these different changes occurred, which remains unknown. In this work, we find that the current best method used to investigate this topic is subject to substantial bias. This implies that it is not possible to reliably determine the order of the different changes.