the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intercomparison of Aerosol Optical Depths from four reanalyses and their multi-reanalysis-consensus
Jeffrey S. Reid
Melanie Ades
Angela Benedettie
Peter R. Colarco
Arlindo da Silva
Tom F. Eck
Johannes Flemming
Edward J. Hyer
Zak Kipling
Samuel Rémy
Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama
Taichu Tanaka
Keiya Yumimoto
Jianglong Zhang
Abstract. The emergence of aerosol reanalyses in recent years has facilitated a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) trends and attribution over multi-decadal timescales. Notable aerosol reanalyses currently available include NAAPS-RA from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory; the NASA MERRA-2; JRAero from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA); and CAMSRA from Copernicus/ECMWF. These aerosol reanalyses are based on differing underlying meteorology models, representations of aerosol processes, and data assimilation methods and treatment of AOD observations. This study presents the basic verification characteristics of these four reanalyses versus both AERONET and MODIS retrievals in monthly AOD properties and identifies the strength of each reanalysis and the regions where diversity and challenges are prominent. Regions with high pollution and often mixed fine-coarse mode aerosol environments such as South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Maritime Continent pose significant challenges, as indicated by higher monthly AOD root mean square error. Moreover, regions that are distant from major aerosol source areas, including the polar regions, and remote oceans exhibit large relative differences in speciated AODs and fine-mode vs coarse-mode AODs among the four reanalyses. To ensure consistency across the globe, a multi-reanalysis-consensus (MRC) approach was developed similar to the International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction Multi-Model Ensemble (ICAP-MME). Like the ICAP-MME, while the MRC does not consistently rank first among the reanalyses for individual regions, it performs well by ranking first or second globally in AOD correlation and RMSE, making it a suitable candidate for climate studies that require robust and consistent assessments.
- Preprint
(8780 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3556 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Peng Xian et al.
Status: open (until 14 Jan 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2354', Stefan Kinne, 24 Nov 2023
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2354/egusphere-2023-2354-RC1-supplement.pdf
Peng Xian et al.
Peng Xian et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
176 | 72 | 9 | 257 | 18 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 176
- PDF: 72
- XML: 9
- Total: 257
- Supplement: 18
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1