Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2337
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2337
16 Oct 2023
 | 16 Oct 2023
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Solar Radiation Modification challenges decarbonization with renewable solar energy

Susanne Baur, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Roland Séférian, and Laurent Terray

Abstract. Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) is increasingly being discussed as a potential tool to reduce global and regional temperatures to buy time for conventional carbon mitigation measures to take effect. However, most simulations to date assume SRM as an additive component to the climate change toolbox, without any physical coupling between mitigation and SRM. In this study we analyse one aspect of this coupling: How renewable energy (RE) capacity, and therefore decarbonization rates, may be affected under SRM deployment by modification of photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) production potential. Simulated 1-hour output from the Earth System Model CNRM-ESM2-1 for scenario-based experiments are used for the assessment. We find that by the end of the century, most regions experience an increased number of low PV and CSP energy weeks per year under SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injections) compared to the moderately ambitiously mitigated scenario SSP245. Compared to the unmitigated SSP585 scenario, while the increase in low energy weeks is still dominant, some areas see fewer low PV or CSP energy weeks under SAI. A substantial part of the decrease in potential with SAI compared to the SSP-scenarios is compensated by optically thinner upper tropospheric clouds under SAI. Our study suggests that using SAI to reduce high-end global warming to moderate global warming could pose increased challenges for meeting energy demand with solar renewable resources.

Susanne Baur et al.

Status: open (until 31 Dec 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2337', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023 reply

Susanne Baur et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 419 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
169 243 7 419 17 7 9
  • HTML: 169
  • PDF: 243
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 419
  • Supplement: 17
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 397 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 397 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Nov 2023
Download
Short summary
Most Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) simulations assume no physical coupling between mitigation and SRM. We analyse the effect of SRM on photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) and find that almost all regions have more low PV and CSP energy weeks per year than a mitigated scenario. Compared to an unmitigated scenario a minority of areas see fewer low PV or CSP energy weeks. This suggests that SRM could pose challenges for meeting energy demand with solar renewable resources.