the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Fractionation of stable carbon isotopes during formate consumption in anoxic rice paddy soils and lake sediments
Peter Claus
Abstract. Formate is energetically equivalent to hydrogen and thus, is an important intermediate during the breakdown of organic matter in anoxic rice paddy soils and lake sediments. Formate is a common substrate for methanogenesis, homoacetogenesis and sulfate reduction. However, how much these processes contribute to formate degradation and fractionate carbon stable isotopes is largely unknown. Therefore, we measured the conversion of formate to acetate, CH4 and CO2 and the δ13C of these compounds in samples of paddy soils from Vercelli (Italy) and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI, the Philippines) and of sediments from the NE and SW basins of Lake Fuchskuhle (Germany). The samples were suspended in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) both in the absence and presence of sulfate (gypsum) and of methyl fluoride (CH3F), an inhibitor of aceticlastic methanogenesis. In the paddy soils, formate was mainly converted to acetate both under methanogenic and sulfidogenic conditions. Methane was only a minor product and was mainly formed from the acetate. In the lake sediments, the product spectrum was similar, but only under methanogenic conditions. In the presence of sulfate, however, acetate and CH4 were only minor products. The isotopic enrichment factors (εform) of formate consumption, determined by Mariotti plots, were in the low range of -8 ‰ to -2.5 ‰ when sulfate was absent and formate was mainly converted to acetate and CH4. However, no enrichment factor was detectable when formate was degraded with sulfate to mainly CO2. The δ13C of acetate was by about 25–50 ‰ more negative than that of formate indicating acetate production by chemolithotrophic homoacetogenesis. Hence, formate seems to be an excellent substrate for homoacetogenesis in anoxic soils and sediments, so that this process is competing well with methanogenesis and sulfate reduction.
- Preprint
(1712 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(767 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Ralf Conrad and Peter Claus
Status: open (until 15 Dec 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2279', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Nov 2023
reply
In this manuscript, the authors report on carbon isotope fractionation during formate transformation in rice paddy soils and lake sediment. They observe formate utilization mainly through homoacetogenesis to be the dominant process that outcompetes methanogenesis and sulfate reduction.
As it appears, the data were collected and evaluated correctly and there is no doubt on their reliability. Nonetheless, it does not become clear why this study was performed and what the outcome is in some few clear sentences. Why was sediment from Fuchskuhle used? Because there were still some 6 years old sediment samples in the coldroom? What are the properties of this specific (and internationally not so well-known) lake (pH, carbonate and sulfate content, trophic status etc.)? Is it representative of freshwater lakes in general? Which general conclusions can be drawn from this study?
Minor comments:
- 111, l. 120: Omit “the”
- 190: Sentence unclear.
Fig. 6, correct Formiat to Formate.
- 307: Energy cannot be generated.
- 342: equivalents.
- 403: Where are the data on the 16SrRNA genes?
- 404: “composition of these genes”? What do the authors mean with that?
- 425: …are degraded in these paddy soils…
- 434: author
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2279-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ralf Conrad, 11 Nov 2023
reply
The incentive for the study is stated in L74-79: “The ε values of methanogenesis or homoacetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 are large (Blaser and Conrad, 2016). However, our knowledge of carbon isotope fractionation with formate as substrate is scarce. In cultures of homoacetogenic bacteria the carbon in the acetate produced from formate was strongly depleted in 13C (ε = -56.5‰) almost similarly as with CO2 as carbon source (Freude and Blaser, 2016). However, it is not known which enrichment factors operate in methanogenic or sulfidogenic environmental samples.” For this purpose, we arbitrarily chose two different methanogenic environments, paddy soil and Lake Fuchskuhle sediments. The reason for chosing them was simply because we had used them before and had background information (e.g. gene sequences). Of course we could have chosen different environments (sewage digestor, peat), but a priori it did not matter in which samples to test for fractionation factors of formate degradation.
It was during the study of fractionation factors that we realized that formate degradation was dominated by homoacetogenesis, which we found to be intriguing. I must admit that we initially expected that formate would be mainly consumed by methanogenesis. However, this was not the case. We briefly discussed this observation but did not present a theoretical explanation. Perhaps we should speculate about the different molecular mechanisms of formate utilization in acetogens versus methanogens, such as outlined in the recent review by Lemaire et al. (Frontiers Microbiol. 2020). General conclusions are that homoacetogenesis seems to be a major pathway of formate utilization in nature, and that strong fractionation of carbon isotopes occurs mainly during the formation of acetate via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, while the initital consumption of formate displayed only a small enrichment factor.
Lake Fuchskuhle is a lake in Northern Germany, which had been the subject of several studies, also own ones. We can expand the description. For our purpose it was as good as any other lake.
By the way, the lake sediment was sampled in 2016, and the experiments were performed in 2017. The experiments on paddy soils were done in 2016. We mentioned that the study of formate degradation was one out of three studies that were performed almost in parallel. The other two studies (quoted in the ms) concerned the degradation and isotope fractionation of acetate and of propionate, both previously published in Biogeosciences.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2279-AC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023
reply
The authors have answered my concerns convincingly.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2279-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023
reply
Ralf Conrad and Peter Claus
Ralf Conrad and Peter Claus
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
96 | 28 | 7 | 131 | 14 | 4 | 8 |
- HTML: 96
- PDF: 28
- XML: 7
- Total: 131
- Supplement: 14
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1