the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The six rights of how and when to test for soil C saturation
Sebastian Doetterl
Moritz Laub
Claude Raoul Müller
Marijn Van de Broek
Abstract. The concept of soil organic carbon (SOC) saturation emerged a bit more than 2 decades ago as our mechanistic understanding of SOC stabilization increased. Recently, the further testing of the concept across a wide range of soil types and environments has led some people to challenge the fundamentals of soil C saturation. Here, we argue that to test the concept, one should pay attention to 6 fundamental principles or rights (R’s): the right measures, the right units, the right fractionation method, the right soil type, the right mineralogy, the right saturation level. Once we take care of those 6 rights across studies, we find a maximum of C stabilized by minerals and estimate based on current data available that this maximum stabilization is around 82 ± 4 g C kg-1 silt+clay for 2:1 clay dominated soils while most likely only around 46 ± 4 g C kg-1 silt+clay for 1:1 clay dominated soils. These estimates can be further improved using more data, especially for different mineralogies across varying environmental conditions. However, the bigger challenge is on how and which C sequestration strategies to implement in order to effectively reach this 82/46 g C kg-1 silt+clay in soils across the globe.
In recent years, several studies (e.g., Begill et al. 2023; Salonen et al. 2023) have questioned the concept of soil carbon (C) saturation, i.e., organic C stabilized by soil minerals (Hassink, 1997; Six et al. 2002). Here, we want to draw attention to six fundamentals that we think one should be cognizant about when “testing” and “questioning” soil C saturation.
- Preprint
(589 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Johan Six et al.
Status: open (until 31 Dec 2023)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2221', Peter Fiener, 07 Nov 2023
reply
Really enjoyed reading the paper after a long day at work. Nice contribution to the soil C saturation discussion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2221-CC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Johan Six, 08 Nov 2023
reply
We are happy to hear that you enjoyed reading our contribution to the C saturation debate. Thank you for this positive feedback!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2221-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Johan Six, 08 Nov 2023
reply
Johan Six et al.
Johan Six et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
208 | 73 | 11 | 292 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 208
- PDF: 73
- XML: 11
- Total: 292
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1