the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global estimates of 100-year return values of daily precipitation from ensemble weather prediction data
Abstract. High-impact river floods are often caused by very extreme precipitation events with return periods of several decades or centuries, and the design of flood protection measures thus relies on reliable estimates of the corresponding return values. However, calculating such return values from observations is associated with large statistical uncertainties due to the limited length of observational time series. Here, 100-year return values of daily precipitation are estimated on a global grid based on a large data set of model-generated precipitation events from ensemble weather prediction. In this way, the statistical uncertainties of the return values can be substantially reduced compared to observational estimates. In spite of a general agreement of spatial patterns, the model-generated data set leads to systematically higher return values than the observations in many regions, with statistically significant differences, for instance, over the Amazon, western Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and India. This may point to an underestimation of very extreme precipitation events in observations, which, if true, would have important consequences for practical water management.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(7120 KB)
-
Supplement
(922 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(7120 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(922 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2057', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2057/egusphere-2023-2057-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Florian Ruff, 17 Mar 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2057', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Jan 2024
The authors develop a method to reduce the sampling error in estimates of very extreme daily precipitation, based on a new dataset consisting of a vast number of weather forecasts.
The manuscript is of a very high standard in terms of clarity, and contains a thorough description of data, methods and results. However, there is one science aspect that needs further consideration. While statistical uncertainty in estimates of extremes is reduced in this new dataset, the evidence on their bias is limited to precipitation amounts for normal weather types (1-in-2 day, and 1-in-10 day) rather than the extreme weather conditions producing the most intense rainfall. A fuller evaluation is required to prove ensemble forecast data from a relatively short period of real weather situations can provide more accurate estimates of very extreme precipitation.
If a revised version included more appropriate validation, and considered the extra points below, then publication as a NHESS Highlight article may be suitable since it has potential to make a substantial contribution to a subject of growing importance to society.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Florian Ruff, 17 Mar 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2057', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2057/egusphere-2023-2057-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Florian Ruff, 17 Mar 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2057', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Jan 2024
The authors develop a method to reduce the sampling error in estimates of very extreme daily precipitation, based on a new dataset consisting of a vast number of weather forecasts.
The manuscript is of a very high standard in terms of clarity, and contains a thorough description of data, methods and results. However, there is one science aspect that needs further consideration. While statistical uncertainty in estimates of extremes is reduced in this new dataset, the evidence on their bias is limited to precipitation amounts for normal weather types (1-in-2 day, and 1-in-10 day) rather than the extreme weather conditions producing the most intense rainfall. A fuller evaluation is required to prove ensemble forecast data from a relatively short period of real weather situations can provide more accurate estimates of very extreme precipitation.
If a revised version included more appropriate validation, and considered the extra points below, then publication as a NHESS Highlight article may be suitable since it has potential to make a substantial contribution to a subject of growing importance to society.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Florian Ruff, 17 Mar 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
394 | 164 | 39 | 597 | 51 | 27 | 24 |
- HTML: 394
- PDF: 164
- XML: 39
- Total: 597
- Supplement: 51
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Florian Ruff
Stephan Pfahl
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(7120 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(922 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper