the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
21st century marine climate projections for the NW European Shelf Seas based on a Perturbed Parameter Ensemble
Jonathan Tinker
Matthew D. Palmer
Benjamin J. Harrison
Enda O'Dea
David M. H. Sexton
Kuniko Yamazaki
John W. Rostron
Abstract. The North West European Shelf Seas (NWS) are environmentally and economically important, and an understanding of how their climate may change helps with their management. However, as the NWS are poorly represented in Global Climate Models, a common approach is to dynamically downscale with an appropriate shelf seas model. We develop a set of physical marine climate projections for the NWS. We dynamically downscale 12 members of the HadGEM3-GC3.05 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble (approximately 70 km horizontal resolution over Europe), developed for UKCP18, using the shelf-seas model NEMO CO9 (7 km horizontal resolution). These are run under the high greenhouse gas emissions RCP8.5 scenario as continuous simulations over the period 1990–2098. We evaluate the simulations against observations in terms of tides, sea surface temperature, surface and near-bed temperature and salinity, and sea surface-height. These simulations represent the state-of-the-art for marine UK projections. We project a Sea-Surface Temperature (SST) rise of 3.11 °C (±2σ = 0.98 °C), and a Sea-Surface Salinity (SSS) freshening of −1.01 psu (±2σ = 0.93 psu) for 2079–2098 relative to 2000–2019, averaged over the NWS (approximately bounded by the 200 m isobar and excluding the Norwegian Trench, Skagerrak, and Kattegat). While the patterns of NWS changes are similar to our previous projections, there is a greater warming and freshening, that could reflect the change from the A1B emissions scenario to the RCP8.5 concentrations pathway or the higher climate sensitivity exhibited by HadGEM3-GC3.05. Off the shelf, south of Iceland, there is limited warming, consistent with a reduction in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulations and associated northward heat transport. These projections have been publicly released, along with a consistent 200-year present day control simulation, to provide an evidence-base for climate change assessments and to facilitate climate impact studies. For example, we illustrate how the two products can be used to estimate of climate trends, unforced variability, and the Time of Emergence (ToE) of the climate signals. We calculate the average NWS SST ToE to be 2034 (with an 8-year range) and 2046 (with a 33-year range) for SSS. We also discuss how these projections can be used to describe NWS conditions under 2 °C and 4 °C global mean warming (compared to 1850–1900), as a policy relevant exemplar use-case.
- Preprint
(6093 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3421 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Jonathan Tinker et al.
Status: open (until 13 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1816', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Oct 2023
reply
The paper is concerned with marine climate projections for 21st century for the north-west European shelf seas. The study is based on numerical modelling and consists of dynamical downscaling of 12 members of HadGEM3-GC3.05 Perturbed Parameter Ensemble using a model NEMO at 7 km resolution. These ensembles are run under the high greenhouse gas emissions RCP8.5 scenario for the time period 1990-2098. The results are then processed to obtain end of 21st century projections of main essential climate variables. The paper is written clearly, is well structures and goes into a great level detail as regards models set-up, including the availability of the output, the directory structure, etc. The results are also presented in clear and concise way. I recommend this paper for publication given that major comment is addressed in the revised paper and some minor technical/grammar issues are addressed.
Major comment:
In the introductory section the authors should elaborate as to why RCP8.5 scenario was chosen. First of all, it is part of the older CMIP5 pool of scenarios rather than one of the CMIP6 scenarios. Outputs from global CMIP6 models have been already available to the scientific communities for downscaling for a few years, thus authors should justify the use of CMIP5 rather than the newer CMIP6. Furthermore, RCP8.5 (and CMIP6' SSP5-8.5), fossil-fuelled development with very high GHG emissions, are widely regarded as highly unlikely scenarios with a consensus that we are already not following the RCP8.5 trajectory. Therefore, I marking a paper down on its scientific significance and I am recommending that the authors elaborate on its scientific value in the revised version. Perhaps the paper still presents a value to the scientific community and it would be good to hear the opinion of the authors. The conclusions section needs to clearly state that reported projections concern a very pessimistic, highly unlikely scenario.
Technical comments:
Ln73: add is after This
Ln79: change evaluation to evaluate
Ln113: change interpolates to interpolate
Ln122: remove can
Ln124: remove can
Ln128: change is it to it is
Ln130: Figure 3 is introduced before Figures 1 and 2. Figure numbering needs to be revised in the manuscript
Ln140: remove is
Ln311: change time so to times of
Ln428: change is to are
Ln496: change process to processes
Ln499: change oecan to ocean
Ln608: change if to of
Ln623: change it is to its
Ln623: change computationally to computational
Ln759: add in after interested
Ln776: remove be
Ln778: change give to gives
Ln779: change response to responses
Ln1118: change to no to do not
Ln1211: change which to while
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1816-RC1
Jonathan Tinker et al.
Jonathan Tinker et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
163 | 67 | 7 | 237 | 16 | 7 | 5 |
- HTML: 163
- PDF: 67
- XML: 7
- Total: 237
- Supplement: 16
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1