the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modelling water quantity and quality for integrated water cycle management with the WSIMOD software
Leyang Liu
Ana Mijic
Abstract. Problems of water system integration occur when a model’s boundaries are too narrow to capture interactions and feedbacks across the water cycle. We propose that integrated water systems models are required to overcome them, and are necessary to understand emergent system behaviour, to expand model boundaries, to evaluate interventions, and to ensure simulations reflect stakeholder goals. We present the Water Systems Integrated Modelling Framework (WSIMOD) software as one such approach and describe its theoretical basis, covering the node and arc nature of simulations, the integration framework that enables communication between model elements, and the model orchestration to customise interactions. We highlight data requirements for creating such a model and the potential for future development and refinement. WSIMOD offers a flexible and powerful approach to represent water systems, and we hope it will encourage further research and application into using model integration towards achieving sustainable and resilient water management.
- Preprint
(1221 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Barnaby Dobson et al.
Status: open (until 08 Dec 2023)
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1662', Barnaby Dobson, 01 Nov 2023
reply
Please note that the ownership of the repository for WSIMOD has changed to ImperialCollegeLondon, and so documentation links can now be found at: https://imperialcollegelondon.github.io/wsi/
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-AC1 -
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1662', Juan Antonio Añel, 03 Nov 2023
reply
Dear authors,Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlYou have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and DOI) as soon as possible, as it should be available before the Discussions stage. Also, please, include the relevant primary input/output data.In this way, if you do not fix this problem, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal. I should note that, actually, your manuscript should not have been accepted in Discussions, given this lack of compliance with our policy. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular.Also, you must include in a potentially reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section, the DOI of the code (and another DOI for the dataset if necessary).Please, note that the link for the GitHub repository in your manuscript does not work.Juan A. AñelGeosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-CEC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Barnaby Dobson, 06 Nov 2023
reply
Dear Juan,
Many thanks - please find the Zenodo DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7662569
Apologies regarding the GitHub link and documentation links in the current manuscript - the ownership of the repository has changed from my personal account to my organisation - so the GitHub link is now:
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/wsi
And documentation now:
https://imperialcollegelondon.github.io/wsi/
I will of course update all of these links and add the zenodo doi when revising the manuscript.
Please let me know if anything further is required.
Best,
Barney
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-AC2 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 07 Nov 2023
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for fixing these issues. We can now consider your manuscript compliant with our code policy.
However, please note that Git repositories in institutional servers are not in compliance with it, so you should move all the documentation to Zenodo, too.
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-CEC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC2', Barnaby Dobson, 07 Nov 2023
reply
Dear Juan,
Apologies - I didn't mean to imply that the institutional repo was a substitute, just that it was why the links weren't working.
The documentation already exists in the zenodo repo under docs, including instructions to compile it into a readthedocs webpage. Is this under the code and data policy - it doesn't seem to make any provision to the format of wiki-style documentation.
Best,
Barney
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CEC2', Barnaby Dobson, 07 Nov 2023
reply
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 07 Nov 2023
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Barnaby Dobson, 06 Nov 2023
reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1662', Hongyi Li, 18 Nov 2023
reply
I enjoyed reading this manuscript. I also applaud the authors for such a nice contribution to the modeling community. Given that GMD is highly interdisciplinary and has a broad audience, I encourage the authors to better define some terminologies upfront. A few specific, minor comments are listed below.
1. Line 26-28. "water cycle" --> "terrestrial water cycle" since the components listed here do not include atmospheric or ocean components. It seems different people have different definitions or understandings about the "components" in a water cycle. To help the readers better understand, a conceptual diagram might be useful here to illustrate the various components (particularly those represented in the model) and their physical and anthropogenic linkages. Lastly, by "hydrological catchments" do the authors mean the surface areas where rain falls and runoff is generated and routed into rivers? If so, I'd suggest placing it at the very beginning of this list, since the terrestrial water cycles (at the catchment, regional, or global scales) begin with rainfall and runoff processes.
2. Line 28. What is the difference between "hydrological catchments" and "river catchments"? If they are the same, please just use "catchments" after the definition upfront.
3. Line 74, "abstracts". Please use another word if possible to avoid confusion. For example, "abstraction" could mean "rainfall infiltration and/o retention" to some hydrologists.
4 . Line 457-460. It would be better to move this example upfront in the introduction, perhaps along with another couple of classic ones. This way, the readers will have a better sense of what are "boundary conditions" and then the authors intend to achieve. I did not get this puzzle resolved until reading to this point.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-RC1 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Barnaby Dobson, 23 Nov 2023
reply
Dear Prof Li,
Thankyou for the kind remarks. We completely agree with your request for more clarifications in the terminology to make the paper understandable to a wider audience. We will make these changes and review the paper for other areas where clarity could be added when we revise the manuscript after the open discussion.
Best,
Barney
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1662-AC4
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Barnaby Dobson, 23 Nov 2023
reply
Barnaby Dobson et al.
Barnaby Dobson et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
195 | 90 | 20 | 305 | 8 | 5 |
- HTML: 195
- PDF: 90
- XML: 20
- Total: 305
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1