Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1483
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1483
 
04 Jan 2023
04 Jan 2023
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Choice of Forecast Scenario Impacts the Carbon Allocation at the Same Global Warming Levels

Lee de Mora1, Ranjini Swaminathan2, Richard P. Allan2, Jeremy Blackford1, Douglas I. Kelley3, Phil Harris3, Chris D. Jones4, Colin G. Jones5, Spencer Liddicoat4, Robert J. Parker6,7, Tristan Quaife2, Jeremy Walton4, and Andrew Yool8 Lee de Mora et al.
  • 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, PL1 3DH
  • 2National Centre for Earth Observation and Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • 3UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
  • 4Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Science and Services, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
  • 5National Centre for Atmospheric Science, UK, and School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 6National Centre for Earth Observation, Space Park Leicester, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • 7Earth Observation Science, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, UK
  • 8National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK

Abstract. The anthropogenic carbon distribution between the atmosphere, land surface and ocean varies significantly with the choice of scenario for identical changes in mean global surface temperature. Moving to a lower CO2 emissions scenario means that warming levels occur later, and with significantly less carbon in the three main carbon reservoirs. After 2 °C of warming, the multi-model mean ocean allocation can be up to 3 % different between scenarios, or 36 Pg in total with an even larger difference in some single model means. For the UKESM1 model, the difference between the minimum and maximum atmospheric fraction at the 2 °C Global Warming Level (GWL) is 3.6 %. This is equivalent to 50 Pg of additional carbon in the atmosphere, or the equivalent of five years of our current global total emissions.

In the lower CO2 concentration scenarios, SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6, the ocean fraction grows over time while the the land surface fraction remains constant. In the higher CO2 concentration scenarios, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5, the ocean fraction remains constant over time while the the land surface fraction decreases over time.

Higher equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) models reach the GWLs sooner, and with lower atmospheric CO2 than lower sensitivity models. However, the choice of scenario has a much larger impact on the percentage carbon allocation at a given warming level than the individual model's ECS.

Lee de Mora et al.

Status: open (until 25 Feb 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Lee de Mora et al.

Model code and software

ESMValTool ESMValTool repository https://github.com/ESMValGroup/ESMValTool

Lee de Mora et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 170 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
134 31 5 170 2 3
  • HTML: 134
  • PDF: 31
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 170
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 172 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 172 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Jan 2023
Download
Short summary
We investigated the flux of carbon from the atmosphere into the land surface and the ocean for multiple models and over a range of future scenarios. We did this by comparing simulations after the same amount of change in the global mean near surface temperature. Using this method, we show that the choice of scenario can have a big impact. Scenarios with higher emissions reach the same warming levels sooner, but also with relatively more carbon in the atmosphere.