the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note: Statistical generation of climate-perturbed flow duration curves
Robert Milton
Solomon Brown
Charles Rougé
Abstract. Assessing the robustness of a water resource system's performance under climate change involves exploring a wide range of streamflow conditions. This is often achieved through rainfall-runoff models, but these are commonly validated under historical conditions with no guarantee that calibrated parameters would still be valid in a different climate. In this note, we introduce the first statistical generation method to produce a range of plausible streamflow futures that are coherent across the full range of hydrological conditions. It relies on a three-parameter analytical representation the flow duration curve (FDC) that has been proved to perform well across a range of basins of different climate. We rigorously prove that for common sets of streamflow statistics mirroring average behavior, variability, and low flows, the parameterisation of the FDC under this representation is unique. We also show that conditions on these statistics for a solution to exist are commonly met in practice. These analytical results imply that streamflow futures can be explored by sampling wide ranges of three key flow statistics, and by deriving the corresponding FDC to model basin response across the full spectrum of flow conditions. We illustrate this method by exploring in which hydro-climatic futures a proposed run-of-river hydropower plant in eastern Turkey is financially viable. Results show that contrary to approaches that modify streamflow statistics using multipliers applied uniformly throughout a time series, our approach seamlessly represents a large range of futures with increased frequencies of both high and low flows. This matches expected impacts of climate change in the region, and supports analyses of the financial robustness of the proposed infrastructure to climate change. We conclude by highlighting how refinements to the approach could further support rigorous explorations of hydro-climatic futures without the help of rainfall-runoff models.
- Preprint
(1352 KB) -
Supplement
(375 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Veysel Yildiz et al.
Status: open (until 02 May 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1468', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Mar 2023
reply
This technical note introduces a numerical framework for the statistical generation of flow duration curves and then demonstrates its relevance on a hydropower planning problem. The key idea supporting the framework is the representation of Flow Duration Curves (FDC) through a set of parameters, whose value is directly related to key streamflow statistics, e.g., mean, median, or standard deviation. By sampling in the space of these statistics (through the use of multipliers), one can then stochastically generate new FDCs.
I believe the proposed approach is novel and technically sound (including the derivations provided in the SI). Importantly, the proposed approach can indeed be useful for a variety of water management applications. The presentation is clear and the manuscript well structured. Hence, my suggestion is to proceed with a minor revision.
My only major comment concerns the ‘type’ of streamflow data that are needed to parameterise the model; a point that, in my opinion, requires a deeper discussion. For example, I believe it may be challenging to implement the framework in a catchment characterized by land use change or other anthropogenic interventions. In other words, I suspect that the use of the framework might be limited to pristine catchments (unless the framework is complemented by a process-based model that somewhat accounts for the aforementioned drivers). Another point I would discuss is the ‘safe operating space’ of the framework, intended as the amount and quality of data needed for its successful implementation. With this, I am not trying to diminish this paper (which I found interesting), but simply to understand how to best use the model it presents.
Finally, the authors may want to consider a full article (rather than a technical note), something that could be done by including the SI in the main manuscript and extending the description of the case study. I would leave this up to the authors.
Specific comments
- Abstract: “coherent across the full range of hydrological conditions”. Could you please elaborate on or clarify the meaning of this statement?
- Line 36-37: I agree with this statement, but also believe that streamflow is not the only source of uncertainty that water planners account for (water demand, for instance, is another one). This is an important caveat I would mention.
- Line 43: should it be “change”?
- Line 64. I would say a few words about the Kosugi model. It is hard to follow the next paragraph (and, hence, grasp the overall contribution) without some basic information about the model.
- Equation 1: I assume that “erfc” refers to the complementary error function, right? I would mention this explicitly in the paper.
- Line 132-133. I’m afraid I don’t fully understand this part: why is it necessary to verify this condition?
- Figure 1. I would expand the caption instead of referring the readers to the main text.
- Line 157. “Additional energy”?
- Line 161. Can you provide more details about the data you used? For instance, how long was this time series? What’s the minimum amount of data needed to make the application of this model successful?
- Line 189. What are the input variables to HYPER?
- Line 2010. What are these other functional forms?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1468-RC1
Veysel Yildiz et al.
Veysel Yildiz et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
173 | 59 | 7 | 239 | 20 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 173
- PDF: 59
- XML: 7
- Total: 239
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1