the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Systematic analysis of virga and its impact on surface particulate matter observations
Abstract. Studies focusing on virga are rare, even though it is a commonly occurring phenomenon. In this study, we investigated aerosol backscatter profiles from a ceilometer located on the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) campus from 2015–2021 to identify virga events. Ceilometer data effectively captured virga events from regular precipitation based on the backscattering intensities. To characterize the virga phenomena, a systematic method was developed using ceilometer profiles, soundings, surface rain gauges, and radar data from the nearest National Weather Service (NWS). A total of 50 virga events were identified during the study period. These events appeared only during a specific time of the year, revealing a seasonal occurrence pattern. We identified and classified these virga events and investigated their impact on the surface measurements recorded by the on-campus Continuous Ambient Air Monitoring Station (CAMS). Virga events were classified as columnar and non-columnar events based on their aerosol profiles. We observed that during some of the columnar virga events, surface PM levels displayed a sudden upward trend indicating aerosol loading in the surface layer after precipitation evaporation. Twenty of the virga events showed a columnar structure out of the fifty identified in this study. More detailed analysis of selected events shows that virga affects regional air quality. A significant result of this study is that analysis of sudden changes in local air quality need to consider the possible effects of virga on the surface layer.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(5497 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(5497 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-906', Nakul Karle, 19 Dec 2022
We deeply appreciate the time and effort the initial referee #02 dedicated to providing valuable feedback towards helping us improve the manuscript. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the referee in our manuscript. Kindly find our response document attached.
Thank you.
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-906', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-906/egusphere-2022-906-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Nakul Karle, 04 Feb 2023
We deeply appreciate the time and effort the initial referee #02 dedicated to providing valuable feedback towards helping us improve the manuscript. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the referee in our manuscript. Kindly find our response document attached.
Thank you.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Nakul Karle, 04 Feb 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-906', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Feb 2023
This work by Karle et al. (Systematic analysis of virga and its impact on surface particulate matter observations) presented some very interesting results regarding the viga precipitation, which is rarely studied. I only have some minor comments before the work can be accepted.
General comments:
- I did not quite understand the large picture between virga precipitation and aerosol. In the abstract and in the case studies, it is stated that “We observed that during some of the columnar virga events, surface PM levels displayed a sudden upward trend indicating aerosol loading in the surface layer after precipitation evaporation.” Should it be the opposite? That is, during the precipitation virga process, PM level should be downward. That is, most of these PM are used as rain drop nuclei. Maybe I missed your point. Please explain.
- In your Table 1, the wind speed and PM, wind speed and DeltaT have very week correlation. Do you think this is an observation issue (that is, your observation does not have finer temporal resolution)? Please explain.
Minor comments:
Fig. 7 and Fig.5, The legend for the “backscatter intensity”, I think the unit is “Z”? Can you please change it to dBZ (like in Fig. 2)
For the sounding profile (e.g., Fig. 6b), please add a legend for different color curves.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-906-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Nakul Karle, 04 Feb 2023
We deeply appreciate the time and effort the initial referee #01 dedicated to providing valuable feedback towards helping us improve the manuscript. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the referee in our manuscript. Kindly find our response document attached.
Thank you.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-906', Nakul Karle, 19 Dec 2022
We deeply appreciate the time and effort the initial referee #02 dedicated to providing valuable feedback towards helping us improve the manuscript. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the referee in our manuscript. Kindly find our response document attached.
Thank you.
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-906', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-906/egusphere-2022-906-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Nakul Karle, 04 Feb 2023
We deeply appreciate the time and effort the initial referee #02 dedicated to providing valuable feedback towards helping us improve the manuscript. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the referee in our manuscript. Kindly find our response document attached.
Thank you.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Nakul Karle, 04 Feb 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-906', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Feb 2023
This work by Karle et al. (Systematic analysis of virga and its impact on surface particulate matter observations) presented some very interesting results regarding the viga precipitation, which is rarely studied. I only have some minor comments before the work can be accepted.
General comments:
- I did not quite understand the large picture between virga precipitation and aerosol. In the abstract and in the case studies, it is stated that “We observed that during some of the columnar virga events, surface PM levels displayed a sudden upward trend indicating aerosol loading in the surface layer after precipitation evaporation.” Should it be the opposite? That is, during the precipitation virga process, PM level should be downward. That is, most of these PM are used as rain drop nuclei. Maybe I missed your point. Please explain.
- In your Table 1, the wind speed and PM, wind speed and DeltaT have very week correlation. Do you think this is an observation issue (that is, your observation does not have finer temporal resolution)? Please explain.
Minor comments:
Fig. 7 and Fig.5, The legend for the “backscatter intensity”, I think the unit is “Z”? Can you please change it to dBZ (like in Fig. 2)
For the sounding profile (e.g., Fig. 6b), please add a legend for different color curves.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-906-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Nakul Karle, 04 Feb 2023
We deeply appreciate the time and effort the initial referee #01 dedicated to providing valuable feedback towards helping us improve the manuscript. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the referee in our manuscript. Kindly find our response document attached.
Thank you.
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
222 | 74 | 13 | 309 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 222
- PDF: 74
- XML: 13
- Total: 309
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Ricardo Kendi Sakai
Rosa Maximilia Fitzgerald
Charles Ichoku
Fernando Mercado
William Ross Stockwell
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(5497 KB) - Metadata XML