the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Snow sensitivity to climate change during compound cold-hot and wet-dry seasons in the Pyrenees
Abstract. The Mediterranean basin has experienced one of the highest warming rates on Earth over the last decades and climate projections anticipate water-scarcity future scenarios. Mid-latitude Mediterranean mountain areas such as the Pyrenees play a key role in the hydrological resources for intensely populated lowland areas. However, there are still large uncertainties about the impact of climate change on the snowpack in high mountain ranges of the Mediterranean region. Here, we provide a climate sensitivity analysis of the Pyrenean snowpack through five key snow climate indicators. Snow sensitivity is analyzed during compound temperature and precipitation extreme seasons, namely Cold-Dry (CD), Cold-Wet (CW), Warm-Dry (WD) and Warm-Wet (WW) seasons, for low (1500 m), mid (1800 m) and high (2400 m) elevation sectors of the Pyrenees. To this end, a physically-based energy and mass balance snow model (FSM2) is validated by ground-truth data, and subsequently applied to the entire range, forcing perturbed reanalysis climate data for the 1980–2019 baseline scenario. The results have shown that FSM2 successfully reproduces the observed snow depth (HS) values, reaching R2 > 0.8, and relative RMSE and MAE lower than 10 % of the observed HS. Overall, climate sensitivity decreases with elevation and increases towards the eastern Pyrenees. When temperature is progressively warmed at 1 ºC intervals, the largest seasonal HS decreases from baseline climate are found at +1 ºC, reaching values of -47 %, -48 % and -25 % for low, mid and high elevations, respectively. Only an upward trend of precipitation (+10 %) could counterbalance temperature increases (<= 1 ºC) at high elevations during the coldest months of the season, since temperature is far from the isothermal 0 ºC conditions. The maximum (minimum) seasonal HS and peak HS max reductions are observed on WW (CD) seasons. During the latter seasons, the seasonal HS is expected to be reduced by -37 % (- 28 %), -34 % (- 30 %), -27 % (-22 %) per ºC, at low, mid and high elevation areas, respectively. For snow ablation climate indicators, the largest decreases are observed during WD seasons, when the peak HS date is anticipated 10 days and snow duration (ablation) decreases (increases) 12 % per ºC. The results suggest similar climate sensitivities in mid-latitude mountain areas; where significant snowpack reductions are anticipated, with relevant consequences in the ecological and socioeconomic systems.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1455 KB)
-
Supplement
(172 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1455 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(172 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-851', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Sep 2022
The submitted manuscript investigates the sensitivity of climatological snow indicators on compound temperature and precipitation changes. The analysis is based on the snow model FSM, which is forced by daily reanalysis data between 1980 and 2019 and assimilated in-situ data. The results focus on seasonal data and three elevation levels.
The topic is definitely of interest for readers of TC. I liked reading the manuscript, which has a clear structure and illustrative figures. However, the language needs some proofreading by English native person. I suggest to accept the manuscript as soon as the following points, have been addressed:
- Chapter 3.1 is missing a common thread and therefor hard to understand. Please restructure the entire chapter. If I got it right then the data of the 4 AWS were used to correct the reanalysis data. But how? What do you mean with “by trial and error basis”?
- The reanalysis data set of Vernay (2021) covers 1958-2020. Why do you analyze 1980 until 2019 only?
- According to Fig. 4 the main (average) snow cover even at high elevation last from November to Mai. This implies that extreme temperature or precipitation in October and June have no or only very marginal impact on the snow cover. However, you define the compound extremes based on October to June values. This makes not much sense!
- I don’t understand the explanation why no change in the peak HS date can be detected (L242), which is also in contradiction to your statement (L582) in conclusions?
Minor points:
L: 46: please rephrase
L 47: snow offset dates! You use also ablation dates and snowmelt dates. Please decide.
L57: in regard to snow duration
L82: spatially highly diverse
L105: repetition of L57
L144: please rephrase
L168: Snow model and validation data
L190: wrong reference format
L191: What do you mean with were excluded? If there is no data, then there is nothing to evaluate!
L192: ultrasonic snow depth sensor
L193: Please provide a reference where to get the data
L196: I’m not able to access the pdf given in the reference
L198: units of the 5th and 6th column are missing.
L218: LWinc and temperature
L220: Meteorological data therein…
L260: What did you when the same peak HS was reached at several dates?
L281: two times “perdentiles”
L253: average compound temperature and precipitation seasons.
L262: This makes no sense. Please rephrase.
L274: the best performance …L278: the better performance?
L279: observations are usually black...
L288: non-linear (see also other occurrences)
L290: absolute or relative decreases
L293: not surprising
L306: please change temperature legend
L311: Average seasonal sensitivity of…
L313: I’d suggest to replace the table with a bar plot
L330: Please change the title of the y-axis to: average seasonal HS change (%)
L331: Anomalies of…
L345: with respect to..
L361: Sensitivity of..
L368: Snow climate sensitivity (expressed as mean HS)
L373: “lasts area” is no English!
L377: Where can I see that “Snow duration sensitivity clearly increases during WW seasons”?
L408: Add percentage to the legend and rephrase figure caption.
L419: “increases in the energy available for snow ablation”. This in contradiction to what you wrote earlier, because the snow offset is moving to times with lower sun angles.
L432: the increase in winter precipitations was mainly based on low elevation data, which is usually rain and not snow.
L437: slightly faster
L438. This higher average …
L443: Therefore, slower snow ablation rate… (where is this shown?)
L448: The earlier peak HS date a low and mid elevation …
L449: starts earlier (i.e. in winter)
L452: any explanation?
L467: mountain range
L473L in this area
L486: no significant trend for maximum HS
L488: in high elevations
L493: Sensitivities of maximum seasonal HS…
L503: highly sensitive
L506: High elevation snowfall
L513: Add percentage to the legend and rephrase figure caption.
L521: disappearance of the typical sequence…
L522: triggers the simultaneous occurrence of several periods of…
L524: on the ecosystem
L525: please rephrase
L533. The earlier snowmelt onset
L547: please rephrase
L551 is dependent on a regular deep enough snow cover, which has been…
L553: The expected increase in snow scarce seasons pointed out in this work, is consistent with snow prejections…
L571: core month of the winter season
L575: Repetition of L565
L581: show slightly larger sensitivities
L582: increases about… and the peak HS date occurs about …
L584: unclear, please rephrase
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-851-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Josep Bonsoms, 25 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-851/egusphere-2022-851-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-851', Adrien Michel, 06 Oct 2022
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Josep Bonsoms, 25 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-851/egusphere-2022-851-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Josep Bonsoms, 25 Oct 2022
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-851', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Sep 2022
The submitted manuscript investigates the sensitivity of climatological snow indicators on compound temperature and precipitation changes. The analysis is based on the snow model FSM, which is forced by daily reanalysis data between 1980 and 2019 and assimilated in-situ data. The results focus on seasonal data and three elevation levels.
The topic is definitely of interest for readers of TC. I liked reading the manuscript, which has a clear structure and illustrative figures. However, the language needs some proofreading by English native person. I suggest to accept the manuscript as soon as the following points, have been addressed:
- Chapter 3.1 is missing a common thread and therefor hard to understand. Please restructure the entire chapter. If I got it right then the data of the 4 AWS were used to correct the reanalysis data. But how? What do you mean with “by trial and error basis”?
- The reanalysis data set of Vernay (2021) covers 1958-2020. Why do you analyze 1980 until 2019 only?
- According to Fig. 4 the main (average) snow cover even at high elevation last from November to Mai. This implies that extreme temperature or precipitation in October and June have no or only very marginal impact on the snow cover. However, you define the compound extremes based on October to June values. This makes not much sense!
- I don’t understand the explanation why no change in the peak HS date can be detected (L242), which is also in contradiction to your statement (L582) in conclusions?
Minor points:
L: 46: please rephrase
L 47: snow offset dates! You use also ablation dates and snowmelt dates. Please decide.
L57: in regard to snow duration
L82: spatially highly diverse
L105: repetition of L57
L144: please rephrase
L168: Snow model and validation data
L190: wrong reference format
L191: What do you mean with were excluded? If there is no data, then there is nothing to evaluate!
L192: ultrasonic snow depth sensor
L193: Please provide a reference where to get the data
L196: I’m not able to access the pdf given in the reference
L198: units of the 5th and 6th column are missing.
L218: LWinc and temperature
L220: Meteorological data therein…
L260: What did you when the same peak HS was reached at several dates?
L281: two times “perdentiles”
L253: average compound temperature and precipitation seasons.
L262: This makes no sense. Please rephrase.
L274: the best performance …L278: the better performance?
L279: observations are usually black...
L288: non-linear (see also other occurrences)
L290: absolute or relative decreases
L293: not surprising
L306: please change temperature legend
L311: Average seasonal sensitivity of…
L313: I’d suggest to replace the table with a bar plot
L330: Please change the title of the y-axis to: average seasonal HS change (%)
L331: Anomalies of…
L345: with respect to..
L361: Sensitivity of..
L368: Snow climate sensitivity (expressed as mean HS)
L373: “lasts area” is no English!
L377: Where can I see that “Snow duration sensitivity clearly increases during WW seasons”?
L408: Add percentage to the legend and rephrase figure caption.
L419: “increases in the energy available for snow ablation”. This in contradiction to what you wrote earlier, because the snow offset is moving to times with lower sun angles.
L432: the increase in winter precipitations was mainly based on low elevation data, which is usually rain and not snow.
L437: slightly faster
L438. This higher average …
L443: Therefore, slower snow ablation rate… (where is this shown?)
L448: The earlier peak HS date a low and mid elevation …
L449: starts earlier (i.e. in winter)
L452: any explanation?
L467: mountain range
L473L in this area
L486: no significant trend for maximum HS
L488: in high elevations
L493: Sensitivities of maximum seasonal HS…
L503: highly sensitive
L506: High elevation snowfall
L513: Add percentage to the legend and rephrase figure caption.
L521: disappearance of the typical sequence…
L522: triggers the simultaneous occurrence of several periods of…
L524: on the ecosystem
L525: please rephrase
L533. The earlier snowmelt onset
L547: please rephrase
L551 is dependent on a regular deep enough snow cover, which has been…
L553: The expected increase in snow scarce seasons pointed out in this work, is consistent with snow prejections…
L571: core month of the winter season
L575: Repetition of L565
L581: show slightly larger sensitivities
L582: increases about… and the peak HS date occurs about …
L584: unclear, please rephrase
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-851-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Josep Bonsoms, 25 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-851/egusphere-2022-851-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-851', Adrien Michel, 06 Oct 2022
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Josep Bonsoms, 25 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-851/egusphere-2022-851-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Josep Bonsoms, 25 Oct 2022
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
310 | 165 | 15 | 490 | 46 | 5 | 3 |
- HTML: 310
- PDF: 165
- XML: 15
- Total: 490
- Supplement: 46
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Josep Bonsoms
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
Esteban Alonso-González
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1455 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(172 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper